By Admin 
The higher education system of the country is once again under the scanner. The reason is the new rules of the University Grants Commission i.e. UGC, in which debate has erupted across the country, especially regarding Rule 3(C). Amidst this controversy, the Supreme Court has currently put a stay on these new rules and has clearly said that only the old rules implemented in 2012 will remain valid in all the colleges and universities of the country. The question is what was the new rule 3(C) and what did the old rule 3(E) say. What is the difference between the two that caused so much ruckus?
UGC had implemented new rules named “Promotion of Equity in Higher Education Institutions Regulations, 2026” on January 13, 2026. Their objective was said to be to create an environment of equality in colleges and universities and to take strict action on complaints of discrimination. But as soon as the rules were implemented, many student organizations, academics and lawyers raised questions on them.
What does Rule 3(C) say?
The most controversial part of the new rules is Rule 3(C). In this, for the first time a clear definition of “caste based discrimination” was given. According to Rule 3(C), caste based discrimination means discrimination against members of Scheduled Castes (SC), Scheduled Tribes (ST) and Other Backward Classes (OBC) on the basis of their caste or tribe only.
That is, it has been clearly stated in this rule that if there is discrimination against these three categories of students or employees due to caste, then it will be considered serious and action will be taken against it.
What did old rule 3(E) say?
Now let us understand Rule 3(E) present in the old rules of 2012. This rule was much more comprehensive. It was said that no student or employee can be discriminated against on the basis of caste, religion, language, region, gender, place of birth, physical condition or any other basis. That is, Rule 3(E) gave equal protection to all classes. In this it was not seen which caste or class the student belonged to. If someone has been treated unfairly, he could complain.
Supreme Court’s comment
The bench led by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant expressed concern during the hearing. The court said that at first glance these rules appear vague and the possibility of their misuse cannot be ruled out.
The court also said that India has made a lot of progress in the last 75 years in the direction of uniting the society. Colleges and universities are places where young people from different backgrounds live, study and grow together. If new lines are drawn on the basis of caste in the campus, it will not be good for the society.
Using its special powers, the Supreme Court has banned the new rules of UGC. The court has made it clear that until the next hearing, the old rules of 2012, i.e. Rule 3(E) will remain applicable. The court has sought answers from the central government and UGC.
Also read – Last chance to improve CUET PG 2026 form, correct the mistakes in the form by January 30
Education Loan Information:
Calculate Education Loan EMI