By Admin 
Think what will happen if a person files an appeal in the court in the name XXX? It may be that on the very first day, Judge Sir reprimanded the appeal court. But if a judge has done the same thing himself? Yes, such a surprising case has come to light, in this case, the High Court judge himself has filed a petition in the Supreme Court named XXX. Actually, these judges are Justice Yashwant Verma, who are facing a proposal in the case of cash sack found at their residence. In such a situation, there is also a question whether a common man can also file a petition in this way?
When and why the name of this method is used
Justice Dipankar Dutta and Justice Augustine George Christ heard this petition by Justice Yashwant Verma. His name has been written in this petition. This method is used to hide the identity of female petitioners victims of sexual harassment or sexual assault in court records. It is also used to hide the identity of adolescents and minors in the controversies of married custody. Because the court says that they should not tell the name of the rape victim in the judgment.
What is in Justice Verma’s appeal?
Justice Verma, in a petition called XXX, appealed to declare the report of the Internal Investigation Committee invalid, in which he was found guilty for the recovery of cash. Justice Verma has also requested that Sanjeev Khanna’s recommendation of May 8 should also be canceled. In this, an appeal was made against him to start impeachment proceedings in Parliament.
Why petition filed as XXX
Justice Verma has filed a petition for approval not to reveal his identity. In this petition, he has said that if his petition is not approved, he may have to face irreparable losses. That is why he sought approval to register in the name XXX in his petition, so that his identity could be hidden.
ALSO READ: The world’s first lipstick was made of deer fat, this company presented in the market