Haj Umrah 2025 Supreme Court Refused to Interfere in Hajj Policy 2025 Implementation Hogs Raised Question on Haj Pilgrims Allocation | HAJ 2025: Why less of Haj pilgrims quota? So many writ petitions filed against HAJ Policy-2025, Supreme Court said

The Supreme Court has refused to hear the petition challenging the implementation of Haj Policy-2025. In the petition, the allocation of quota of Haj pilgrims has been described as discriminatory and arbitrary. The court has refused to intervene in this case. However, the court admitted that the commercial interest should also be taken care of while making the policy. The Government of India has made this policy in collaboration with Saudi Arabia.

According to the report of Live Law, Justice Suryakant and Justice N. Kotishwar Singh’s bench was hearing on the case. The Haj Group Organizers (HGOS) filed separate writ petitions and objected to the implementation of the policy and said that some HGOs have been given less Haj pilgrims than others. The court was listening to all the petitions simultaneously. The court said that these petitions have been filed not to challenge the policy but to challenge its implementation. He said that the implementation of policy has already taken shape, then he cannot interfere in it.

The court told the chief and non-prominent HGO that they could reel to HGO with low allocation to surplus Haj pilgrims. The court admitted that in the implementation of new policy like Haj 2025, there are often initial challenges and also faces discrepancies.

The court said that the most important beneficiaries of policy are Haj pilgrims and religious interest is the basis of policy. Apart from this, it is also necessary to consider the commercial interests of HGO, for which these writ petitions have been filed, so in future, the interests of HGOs will take care of HGOs for the implementation of Haj policies.

The court said that these petitions have not challenged the policy but the implementation of policy, we will not handle it, but in future, the petitioners are free to put their arguments in front of the appropriate form for any such discrimination or other issues.

Also read:-
The lover had told the accused in the Meerut murder case Muskan- ‘Star on Saurabh’s heart’, what happened in the post mortem report