During the hearing of the ongoing dispute between Karisma Kapoor’s children and her stepmother Priya Sachdev Kapoor, the Delhi High Court said that it does not want to dramatize the matter. The matter is regarding the property of late businessman Sanjay Kapoor on which the children have claimed their rights.
Karisma Kapoor raised the issue of daughter’s fees in the court
During the hearing in Delhi High Court, senior lawyer Mahesh Jethmalani, on behalf of Karisma Kapoor’s children, told the court that Karisma’s daughter is studying in a university in America. But the fees for the last two months have not been paid.
He said that as per the divorce agreement, Sanjay Kapoor had to bear the education and expenses of the children and now his property is with Priya Kapoor.
In response to this, Priya Kapoor’s lawyer claimed in the court that all the expenses of the children have been taken care of and the statement of non-payment of fees is wrong. He said that these issues are being raised in the court so that they make headlines in the media.
Delhi High Court expressed displeasure in the matter
In Delhi High Court, Justice Jyoti Singh expressed his displeasure and said that such small issues should not come in the court. He instructed the senior lawyer appearing on behalf of Priya Kapoor that such complaints should not reach the court in future.
The court clearly said that I do not want to spend even 30 seconds on such things. Delhi High Court is currently hearing the application in which Karisma’s children have demanded to stop Priya Kapoor from selling Sanjay Kapoor’s property.
Karisma Kapoor’s children have made serious allegations
By filing an application in the Delhi High Court, the children of actress Karisma Kapoor have alleged that Priya Kapoor has wrongly prepared the will of Sanjay Kapoor and wants to transfer the entire property in her name.
On behalf of Priya Kapoor, it was said that the will is genuine and it was also shared in the family’s WhatsApp group. Both the witnesses have confirmed that the will was made correctly. The court will now hear the case next on November 19 and wants an early decision on the interim order.

