By Admin 
The Special Court of Mumbai pronounced the verdict in the 2008 bomb blast case in Malegaon. All the seven accused in this case including Pragya Thakur were acquitted. The court said that cannot be convicted on suspicion. He also explained the arguments about acquitting the accused. The court said that the investigating agencies could not prove their claims. It was also not proved whether the bike on which the bomb was planted was Sadhvi Pragya or not.
Along with Sadhvi Pragya Singh, Lieutenant Colonel Prasad Purohit, Retired Major Ramesh Upadhyay, Sudhakar Chutrvedi, Ajay Rahairkar, Sudhakar Dwivedi and Sameer Kulkarni were made accused in the case of Malegaon blast. The court said that after the incident, experts did not gather suit. The charge sheet of ATS and NIA has made a lot of difference. Many mistakes have also been found during the investigation.
The argument of the court, acquitted accused of accused
- Investigation agencies’ claims did not prove in court
- Bike chassis number not found
- The owner of the bike is Sadhvi Pragya, but there is no evidence of possession
- It was also not proved that the bomb was planted in the bike itself
- Prasad Purohit made a bomb, no proof
- It was also not proved who plants the bomb
How Sadhvi Pragya’s connection related to Malegaon blast
On 29 September 2008, there was a bomb blast in Malegaon, in which 6 people were killed and more than 100 were injured. The first clue of the case is one Lml Freedom was found by bike. The wrong number was on it. Also, the engine and Jesis number were also tampered with. This bike was in the name of Sadhvi Pragya, but it was not proved in the court that she had possession.
What was the charge against Colonel Purohit
The name of Colonel Purohit also came up in the case. It was alleged that they had hidden RDX from Kashmir and kept it hidden in their house. It was also alleged that he had made a bomb, but these claims of investigating agencies could not be proved.