By Admin 
Sheikh Hasina on Muhammad Yunus: Former Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina has accused the interim government chief Mohammad Yunus of selling the country to America. Sheikh Hasina also condemned the recently imposed ban on her Awami League Party. He described this move of the Yunus government as unconstitutional.
In an audio message posted on Awami League’s social media account, Sheikh Hasina once again accused Mohammad Yunus of capturing the Bangladesh government with the help of extremist groups. This statement of Bangladesh’s deputed Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina has come to light at a time when Mohammad Yunus threatened to resign on the call of the army in December.
,Mohammad Yunus handed over government to terrorists,
In the audio message, Sheikh Hasina claimed, “Mohammad Yunus, who made an international identity under his government, has given the government’s reins to the terrorists, against whom his government fought the fight.”
He said, “My father did not agree with America’s demands for the island of St. Martin.” He had to give his life for this. This was my destiny, because I never thought of selling the country to stay in power.
,Handicapped power with the help of terrorists,
Sheikh Hasina alleged in the audio message, saying, “Mohammad Yunus took power in Bangladesh with the help of extremist groups. He grabbed power with the help of terrorists. Took the help of such terrorists, who are banned in various international areas, against which my government has protected the people of Bangladesh. Now the jails are empty. He (Yunus government) released everyone. Now Bangladesh is the rule of those terrorists.
,Laws cannot change without Parliament,
He targeted the government for banning the Awami League in Bangladesh, calling Mohammad Yunus a ‘militant leader’. Sheikh Hasina said, “Who gave the right to touch the constitution to this militant leader who has illegally occupied power?” He does not have the mandate of the people and has no constitutional basis. That post (Chief Advisor) also has no basis and it does not exist. How can they change the law without Parliament? It is illegal.