By Admin 
The Supreme Court has refused to hear the petition filed against the policy of the Assam government to deport people by calling people to Bangladesh. The Supreme Court has said that the petitioners should go to the High Court. A petitioner caused personal pain in the Supreme Court and said that perhaps his mother has been sent to Bangladesh suddenly without proper procedure. He does not know where the mother is. The court spoke about the hearing on this petition next week.
On May 30, a man named Yunus Ali had filed a petition in front of the bench of Chief Justice Bhushan Ramakrishna Gavai, Justice Augustine George Christ and Justice AS Chandurkar, saying that his mother had been illegally detained by the Assam Police. On the arguments of Yunus Ali’s lawyer Shoaib Alam, the Supreme Court gave the date of June 2 for hearing. Yunus Ali requested for the early release of his mother Monovara.
The petitioner alleges that on May 24, his mother was called to the Dhubri police station on the pretext of recording the statement and then taken into custody. During this time, Advocate Shoaib Alam also expressed concern that people are detained in the state and Bangladesh is deported overnight, while their legal cases are pending.
The lawyer told the court that a special permission petition (SLP) was filed by Yunus Ali’s mother in 2017, on which notices were issued, but still people are being deported while the hearing in this court is still going on.
He said that many such videos are being broadcast, in which it is shown that people were caught overnight and sent across the border. Monovara was on bail from December 12, 2019 following an order of the Supreme Court in the case, in which the prisoners who spent more than three years in the foreign custody of Assam were allowed to be conditionally released.
The petitioner says that when he went to the police station the next day, he told the officials that his case is still pending in the Supreme Court, he was not allowed to meet his mother and his release was also denied. The petition challenged the decision of the Guwahati High Court, which upheld the decision of the foreign tribunal declaring Monovara as foreign.