Police have registered an FIR in the case of misbehavior with the team of Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) in Shahi Jama Masjid located in Sambhal district of Uttar Pradesh. This case pertains to two members of the mosque’s arrangement committee stopping ASI officials from entering the main dome and behaving in an objectionable manner.

According to police sources, ASI Superintending Archaeologist Vinod Singh Rawat said that his team had gone to the mosque under Meerut Circle on October 8 to inspect the conservation work. During the inspection, mosque employees Hafiz and Mohammad Kashif Khan stopped the ASI team from going inside the dome.

ASI team forced to return after protest

It is alleged in the case that an unknown person also tried to create a dispute on the spot and used objectionable language. Due to this, the ASI team could not complete its inspection and was forced to return to Meerut. It is alleged that during this period government work was disrupted and attempts were made to spoil the atmosphere.

FIR registered against Hafiz and Mohammad Kashif

Sambhal police station in-charge Gajendra Singh said that on the basis of the complaint, an FIR has been registered against Hafiz and Mohammad Kashif Khan under sections 132 (use of force to prevent a government servant from performing duty), 352 (intentional insult) and 351 (2) (criminal intimidation) of the Indian Penal Code. Police have started investigating the case and efforts are being made to arrest the accused.

Conservation and inspection work should be completed without any hindrance – ASI

Local people said that Shahi Jama Masjid is a historical place of Sambhal and conservation work here is necessary to be done on time. At the same time, the mosque staff have denied the allegations and said that their intention was not to insult anyone. ASI officials also said that the conservation and inspection work should be completed without any hindrance.

According to experts, preservation of historical heritage is important not only for the local administration but also for the central government. In such cases, it is important to allow government teams to work without any hindrance, so that the historical structures can be preserved and protected from future damage.

Also read- Mayawati is happy on BSP’s victory in Ramgarh in Bihar elections, said – the conspiracy to defeat her has failed.

The Allahabad High Court has expressed serious concern by a gym trainer from Meerut in the case of misconduct of a woman. The High Court has strictly heard the matter.

At the same time, the court has raised the question whether male gym trainers are currently training women without adequate security measures. Let me tell you that the gym trainer committed indecency and abuse with the woman, after which the woman was pushed and thrown out.

After all, what is the whole matter?

On 29 April 2024, women were doing workouts in a gym in Madhavapuram, Meerut. Meanwhile, gym trainer Nitin Saini abused the woman and abused her and misbehaved with her. It is alleged that he forcefully pushed the woman out of the gym.

After this incident, the woman lodged an FIR at Brahmapuri police station in Meerut on 1 May 2024. The FIR was registered under sections 354 and 504 of the IPC as well as sections 3 (2) (5) of the SC/ST Act. Apart from this, the victim recorded a statement in the court under Section 164 of the CRPC. The woman also alleged that the appellant Nitin Saini made pornographic videos of her friend Aarti and was sending pornographic material to her for the last several months.

What did the High Court say during the hearing?

A single bench of Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav heard the criminal appeal of Nitin Saini. The court said that this situation is very worrying that male trainers are training women without ensuring adequate security and respect.

The court directed the investigating officer of Brahmapuri police station to file a personal affidavit, in which it is clear whether the gym is duly registered or not, whether the arrest of accused trainer Nitin Saini has been done or not, women instructors are present in the gym or not.

When is the next hearing on this matter?

The High Court has fixed the next hearing of the case 8 September 2025. The court made it clear that such misconduct with women falls in serious criminal category and strict action should be taken on it.

Rahul Gandhi’s refusal on affidavit, Ashok Gehlot has compared North Korea, know what is the whole matter

There will be many people around you who will abuse on the matter. Even though their purpose is not to humiliate anyone, but this makes their thinking and behavior clear. The abuse, which is considered a derogatory word, has now been included in the practical language of the people that even if not wanting, the abuse of the mother-sister and daughter’s name comes out of the mouth.

The surprising thing is that not only men, but college girls and women are also included in large numbers. Dr. Sunil Jagalan, founder of Selfie with Daughter Foundation and Professor of Maharishi Dayanand University Rohtak has conducted a survey on this. It has been revealed in this survey that Delhi is at the top among the abusive states.

The most abuse is given in these states

Delhi tops the abusive states. The data of the Sarvans has shown that 80% of the people of Delhi abuse. Similarly, Punjab is at number two, where 78% of people abuse the names of mother, sister and daughter on talk. In Uttar Pradesh, 74% of people abuse mother and sister, then Bihar is at number four in it.

• Delhi-80%
• Punjab-78%
• Uttar Pradesh-74%
• Bihar-74%
• Rajasthan-68%
• Haryana-62%
• Maharashtra-58%
• Gujarat-55%
• Madhya Pradesh-48%
• Uttarakhand-45%
• Kashmir-15%
• North East and other -20 to 30%

Girls are not far behind in abusing

The most shocking aspect of this survey is that even girls are not behind boys in abusing. 30% of girls and women involved in the survey also abuse. Even in schools and colleges, it is common to abuse in the name of mother, sister and daughter. In this survey, 70 thousand people from different states have been included in the last 11 years, including youth, parents, teachers, policemen, doctors, lawyers, businessmen, panchayat members, professors,.

Also read: How many Indians have been hanged abroad? Nimisha Priya is not the first case