The megastar of the century, Amitabh Bachchan has been active on the screen for 5 decades. He has fan following all over the world. Amitabh Bachchan has been active in the film world since the 70s. He has left an impression on people of all ages with his acting.

There came a time when Bollywood star Amitabh Bachchan entered politics. That period was of 1984. Amitabh, who was very close to Rajiv Gandhi, was prepared by Rajiv Gandhi to contest the elections.

Contested elections against Hemwati Nandan Bahuguna

Finally, in the 1984 Lok Sabha elections, Amitabh Bachchan entered the political arena. He contested the elections from Allahabad on Congress ticket. Bachchan was facing competition from veteran Congress leader Hemwati Nandan Bahuguna. In the 1984 Lok Sabha elections, Congress gave ticket to Amitabh and Hemwati was in the fray from Bahuguna Lok Dal.

This election became very interesting when Congress fielded Amitabh Bachchan against Hemwati Nandan Bahuguna. Although Amitabh had become a superstar by then, he was a new player in politics compared to Bahuguna. Therefore at that time it was very difficult to say who would win?

Finally the election results came and superstar Amitabh Bachchan registered his victory with historic votes by defeating the veteran political leader by a record margin of 1 lakh 87 thousand votes.

The passion of the fans led to a historic victory

Amitabh’s fan following not only led to a historic victory in the elections, but also an interesting incident took place during the counting of votes which reflected the fame of Amitabh Bachchan and his acting The madness among the people was telling.

In fact, during the counting of votes, Amitabh Bachchan was about four Thousand Votes were cancelled. Kiss marks with lipstick on these votes ( Kiss Mark) Were made. Actually these superstar’s fans are women And It was the girls’ votes who stamped the ballot paper. In place of Which mark was used to cast the vote?

However, it is a different matter that even after winning the historic vote, Amitabh Bachchan did not complete the term of Parliament and left the Parliament in 1988. He not only left MP but also resigned from politics forever. He calls this his biggest mistake.

But those votes cast in his name are still on the lips of the people of that era.,

Allahabad High Court on Husband Wife Relation: The Allahabad High Court has expressed displeasure in a case of uploading pornographic videos of his wife on Facebook. The High Court has said that if the marriage is of marriage, the husband does not get his wife’s ownership or control over her nor does marriage reduce her autonomy or right to privacy.

While dismissing the petition filed with the demand to dismiss the husband’s charge sheet, High Court Judge Vinod Diwakar said, “By uploading a video of intimate relations on Facebook, the husband has severely violated the sanctity of the matrimonial relationship. A husband is expected to respect his wife’s faith and faith, especially in the context of his intimate relationship.”

Betrayal weakens the basis of matrimonial relationship- court

The Hoi Court said, “Sharing such content is a violation of the inherent privacy that defines the relationship between husband and wife. This betrayal weakens the basis of marital relationship and does not get protection of marital relationship.” The court further said, “A wife is not an extension of her husband, but is a person who has his own rights and desires. Respecting his physical autonomy and privacy is not just a legal obligation, but a moral imperative to promote the same relationship in the true sense.”

According to the facts of the case, the woman had filed a case under Section 67 of the IT Act against her husband Pradyuman Yadav in police station Padri of Mirzapur. She alleges that her husband made a pornographic video of the intimate relationship without her information and consent and shared it on Facebook and shared it.

Husband said- there is no crime on me

The petitioner’s counsel said that his client is married to the complainant, so there is no offense under Section 67 of the IT Act. Apart from this, there is a lot of scope for agreement between husband and wife. However, the Additional Government Advocate opposed the petition saying that although the complainant is a legal married wife of the petitioner, the petitioner has no right to make pornographic videos of his wife and upload it on Facebook.

Also read-

On the demand to make Keshav Prasad CM of UP, now OP Rajbhar also said- in our party …