Bollywood actor Rajpal Yadav was released from jail in check bounce case on 17th February. After which the actor has also shared the first post on social media. In this post, Rajpal has thanked all his fans and has also touched their hearts once again.

Rajpal Yadav’s post

After being released from jail on interim bail, Rajpal Yadav has once again become active on social media. Rajpal has recently shared his first post on Instagram. In this post he wrote, ‘Heartfelt thanks to all of you for your love and support’. He wrote this post in a very simple and emotional manner and also added a folded hands emoji.

Fans showed love in support, received heart touching comments

In this post, he did not mention anything negative, but thanked his supporters. Fans reacted a lot to his post. Many people welcomed him with loving words. One fan wrote, “You are the diamond of our generation.” Many expressed happiness over his return and wished him all the best.

Eyes on the next court date and Rajpal’s further steps

Let us tell you that due to the check bounce case, he had to go to jail for a few days, but now he has got temporary relief. Rajpal Yadav is a well-known face for Bollywood and thanking his fans in his post shows that he respects his supporters. His further steps and the next court date are now in everyone’s eyes.

Regarding the case of bail rejection of former student leader Umar Khalid, the country’s former CJI DY Chandrachud said on Sunday (January 18) that it is the right of a citizen to get bail before conviction. Along with this, the former CJI asked to ensure transparency in the collegium system related to the appointment of judges in the High Court and the Supreme Court and to restore and strengthen the trust of the common citizen in the judiciary.

‘The matter of right to bail before conviction’
When the issue of bail of Umar Khalid was initially raised by senior journalist Veer Sanghvi in ​​the ‘Ideas of Justice’ session at the 19th Jaipur Literature Festival, Justice (Retd) Chandrachud said, “It is a matter of right to bail before conviction.” Our law is based on a presumption and that presumption is that any accused person is innocent until proven guilty.” Giving examples of several cases, Justice Chandrachud said that if there is a possibility of the accused returning to the society to commit the crime again, tampering with the evidence or taking advantage of bail to escape from the clutches of the law, then bail can be refused to the accused.

What did you say about national security?
He said that if these three grounds are not there then bail will have to be granted. I feel that where there is a national security issue, it is the duty of the court to investigate the matter in depth. Otherwise what is happening is that people remain in jail for years. Expressing concern over the delay in disposal of cases in the Indian criminal justice process, he said that the Constitution of the country is the supreme law and there is no concrete exception in the case and if there is a delay in speedy trial, the accused is entitled to bail.

What did the district courts say about not granting bail?
Justice Chandrachud described the non-grant of bail by the sessions and district courts as a matter of concern and said that distrust towards authority has increased and judges fear that their integrity will be questioned. He said that this is the reason why bail cases reach the Supreme Court. He described the decisions given by the Supreme Court regarding granting permanent commission to women in the armed forces, decriminalizing homosexuality and ‘electoral bonds’ as major transformative decisions of his tenure.

What was said on marital rape case
On the question of not taking up any post after retirement, Justice Chandrachud said that at present he is enjoying life as a citizen. When asked about his regrets regarding any case during his tenure, Justice Chandrachud said that it has been 76 years since the country got independence but even today marital rape has not been brought into the category of crime. He strongly advocated for change in the law for this. It was during his tenure that live telecast of Supreme Court proceedings was started not only in Hindi language but in all the Indian languages ​​listed in the Eighth Schedule of the Constitution.

read this also

Weather Forecast: When will it rain in UP? IMD’s update has arrived, cold will increase further in Delhi, Bihar, Punjab and Haryana from today.

Rahul gandhi defamation case: Congress MP and Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi surrendered in the MP-MLA court in Lucknow on Tuesday. The surrender was done under a defamation case filed in connection with the alleged defamatory remarks allegedly made on the Indian Army. Soon after the surrender in the court, Rahul Gandhi’s lawyer filed a bail petition, which was approved by the court and he was granted bail.

Controversial statement was given during India’s journey
The whole matter is on 16 December 2022, when Rahul Gandhi, while referring to the clash of the Galwan Valley in a conversation with the media during the Bharat Jodo Yatra, said that, “Chinese soldiers are killing our soldiers, but the media does not question them.” This statement was described as abusive to the army.

Army official answer
The Indian Army had issued a statement on 12 December to make it clear that the Chinese Army had attempted to infiltrate the Indian border, which the Indian Army responded strongly. After this, the Chinese soldiers returned and both sides suffered minor injuries in the clash.

Retired officer filed a complaint

Retired director of Border Roads Organization (BRO) Uday Shankar Srivastava filed a complaint against Rahul Gandhi in the court regarding this statement given on the army. It has been said in the complaint that Rahul Gandhi has deliberately made false and defamable statements with the aim of tarnishing the image of the Indian Army.

The court summoned Rahul as accused

The MP-MLA court of Lucknow summoned Rahul Gandhi as an accused in the case. On Tuesday, he surrendered before the court and got bail. Now the date of the next hearing of this case will be determined by the court, in which the arguments of the parties will be heard.