Bangladesh’s International Crime Tribunal (ICT) on Tuesday (August 12, 2025) dismissed the petition to allow senior advocate ZI Khan Panna of the Supreme Court to represent former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina. The matter is related to anti -humanity crimes associated with the protests that started in July last year.

Analysts believe that this decision is injustice to the judicial process and has violated Hasina’s right to rescue. Advocate Najnin Nahar filed this application on behalf of Panna.

According to local media, while hearing the petition in the testimony, the Tribunal said that it cannot be accepted. ICT remarked, “The train has already left the station, it is not possible to ride in it by informing the station master. There is no opportunity to appoint a new lawyer in this phase of the case.” The tribunal said that the Supreme Court lawyer Amir Hussain has already been appointed by the state to advocate Hasina.,

In which case the case on Sheikh Hasina is going on?

Significantly, on August 3, the prosecution started its action against Hasina and two others in the case of anti -human crime in ICT. The co-accused include former Home Minister Asdujman Khan Kamal and former Inspector General of Police (IGP) Chaudhary Abdullah Al Mamoon. After the proceedings, Awami League termed the allegations leveled against his leadership as politically motivated and called it a conspiracy of the illegal interim government led by Mohammad Yunus.

The leader of the Awami League told the Yunus government

Awami League leader Mohammad A. Arafat said, “Neither former Prime Minister Hasina nor he has received a formal information about the case, which reflects the absurd action of this non-elected government. It is part of the conspiracy of a non-elected occupiers, which is desperate to end democratic legitimacy, silence the opposition and remain in power. Such a government has no legal and no moral rights that it has been prosecuted for the public. Parliament has the right to amend the law passed by Parliament. ”

He said that any democratically elected leader should not be prosecuted to perform constitutional duties while facing violent rebellion.

Also read: Sitting in the US threatened India, banned on BLA and guest Nawaji … Trump gave these 5 gifts to Asim Munir, fulfilled the wish of mind!

Veena Sikri on Muhammad Yunus Resign: Former India High Commissioner Veena Sikri in Bangladesh has made a big statement on the resignation of Mohammad Yunus. He has termed the discussion of Mohammad Yunus’s resignation as a drama. He said that the matter of resignation of Mohammood Yunus is completely only a drama. Yunus had no intention of resigning, even he himself never said that he would resign.

Former India High Commissioner Veena Sikri in Bangladesh told the news agency ANI, “The resignation of Mohammad Yunus was really a deception to divert the attention of the people from the Bangladeshi Army Chief and all other military officers.”

Bangladesh Army wants to election by the end of this year- Veena Sikri

He said, “On May 21, Bangladesh’s military chief General Waqar-e-Zaman had called all military officers and held a discussion with them. Five important points were announced after discussion with military officials. One of these five important points was completely clear that the army wanted to ensure that by the end of this year to ensure that the general elections were held in Bangladesh by the end of this year.”

#Watch Delhi: Former High Commissioner of India to Bangladesh Veena Sikri Says, “The question about Muhammad yunus resigning was a complete drama Himself that he would result … it was just a drama meant to… pic.twitter.com/jdbzi3evcs

– ANI (@ani) May 25, 2025

Mohammad Yunus has no right- Veena Sikri

Former High Commissioner Veena Sikri said, “After the Army’s announcement, it now depends on Mohammad Yunus that what they react to this? Because it is very important to remember that on August 5 last year, when Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina migrated from the country after the student movement, the Bangladeshi military chief agreed that the Bangladeshi military chief agreed that Mohammad Unus can be sworn in as an interim government.”

He said, “However, this is just an interim government, it is not even a caretaker government. In such a situation, he does not have the right to make any kind of improvement and the right to make any changes in the constitution. But Mohammad Yunus -led regime still made many changes, made cases, filed cases against Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina and even his political party did not have the right to Bangladesh Awami League, which did not have the right.”

Mohammed Yunus supports Islamic fundamentalists

Veena Sikri said, “Mohammad Yunus has the support of Islamic fundamentalists. It includes all Islamic radical groups including Jamaat-e-Islami. I would say that they are representatives of Islamic fundamentalists.”

Sheikh Hasina on Muhammad Yunus: Former Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina has accused the interim government chief Mohammad Yunus of selling the country to America. Sheikh Hasina also condemned the recently imposed ban on her Awami League Party. He described this move of the Yunus government as unconstitutional.

In an audio message posted on Awami League’s social media account, Sheikh Hasina once again accused Mohammad Yunus of capturing the Bangladesh government with the help of extremist groups. This statement of Bangladesh’s deputed Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina has come to light at a time when Mohammad Yunus threatened to resign on the call of the army in December.

,Mohammad Yunus handed over government to terrorists,

In the audio message, Sheikh Hasina claimed, “Mohammad Yunus, who made an international identity under his government, has given the government’s reins to the terrorists, against whom his government fought the fight.”

He said, “My father did not agree with America’s demands for the island of St. Martin.” He had to give his life for this. This was my destiny, because I never thought of selling the country to stay in power.

,Handicapped power with the help of terrorists,

Sheikh Hasina alleged in the audio message, saying, “Mohammad Yunus took power in Bangladesh with the help of extremist groups. He grabbed power with the help of terrorists. Took the help of such terrorists, who are banned in various international areas, against which my government has protected the people of Bangladesh. Now the jails are empty. He (Yunus government) released everyone. Now Bangladesh is the rule of those terrorists.

,Laws cannot change without Parliament,

He targeted the government for banning the Awami League in Bangladesh, calling Mohammad Yunus a ‘militant leader’. Sheikh Hasina said, “Who gave the right to touch the constitution to this militant leader who has illegally occupied power?” He does not have the mandate of the people and has no constitutional basis. That post (Chief Advisor) also has no basis and it does not exist. How can they change the law without Parliament? It is illegal.