Coordination committees of the Bar Association of all district courts of Delhi have made it clear that the strike of lawyers starting from September 8 will neither be postponed nor withdrawn. This strike is being done by the police on the issue of presenting evidence in the court through online medium from the police stations itself.

Discussion held in coordination committee meeting

According to the information issued by the New Delhi Bar Association (NDBA), there was a meeting of the committee on Saturday. The main issue in the meeting was that policemen should appear directly in courts for testimony, evidence and not online. The information said, “We are adamant on our demand and repeat that policemen will have to appear directly in the courts for testimony, evidence.”

NDBA Secretary Tarun Rana said that a letter from the President of Bar Council of India was received on Saturday. This letter was addressed to the presidents and secretaries of the Bar Association of all the district courts of Delhi, requesting to withdraw the movement.

Movement will continue till the demand is met

In a statement issued by NDBA, Rana said, “However, we want to clarify that the Coordination Committee has started this movement to protect the interests of the general public, and this movement will continue till our proper demand is met.”

Declaration of indefinite work boycott

NDBA Secretary Tarun Rana further said in the statement that “it has been decided unanimously that if the testimony is not ensured in the court of all police officers to present evidence, then we will stand on our decision of indefinite work boycott from September 8, and this movement will be further intensified.”

Chief Justice of India (CJI) BR Gawai spoke with impunity against the bulldozer policy of the governments. CJI attended a program organized by Goa High Court Bar Association on Saturday (August 23, 2025) in Goa’s capital Panaji.

During this, while addressing the function, he said that he is happy that the Supreme Court’s decision against the demolition of the houses of the accused persons without following the legal process has upheld the rights of the citizens.

‘Executive cannot become a judge’
BR Gawai was part of the bench of the Supreme Court, which immediately criticized the ‘bulldozer justice’ and set guidelines for the demolition of the assets for the country. It was said in the judgment that the executive cannot become a judge and cannot declare any accused guilty nor can his house be dropped.

‘My decision was criticized by the people of my own community’
Addressing the function, the Chief Justice of the country also explained the argument behind his historical decision on ‘Creamy layer’ in the reserved category. Gawai said, “My decision was criticized by the people of my own community, but I always believe that I should write my decision not according to the wishes or pressure of the people, but on the basis of the understanding of the law and the voice of my conscience.”

Pointing to the speeches made by the former speakers during the honor ceremony, pointing to their historical decisions, CJI Gavai said, “I really are happy that as the patron of the Constitution we could do something to protect the rights of the citizens whose houses were demolished without following legal processes.”

Also read

Nikki murder case: 14 days judicial custody to main accused Vipin, mother -in -law arrested, know what happened so far