After the release of the final list of special intensive revision (SIR) in Bihar, on Tuesday (October 7, 2025), the Supreme Court demanded that the names of 3.66 lakh people removed from the list be made public. The petitioners say that neither notice was sent to any of these and their names were removed on the objection of others. On this, the court asked the petitioners for whom he is raising his voice, there are some who will not come to court even if the name is out of the list.

Justice Suryakant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi were hearing the bench case. Senior Advocates Abhishek Manu Singhvi and Prashant Bhushan appeared on behalf of the petitioners. Prashant Bhushan said that after reviewing the final list, it was found that it had complicated the situation. He said that a large number of people were excluded in the name of improvement in the voter list. Abhishek Manu Singhvi also said that people did not get information that their name was removed and no one was given an appeal. Advocate Vrinda Grover also said that the information available on the Election Commission website is not clear, in which information is not available according to gender or age.

Some will not come to court even after removing the name from the alien list, Justice Suryakanth said
According to The Hindu report, Justice Suryakant asked Advocate Prashant Bhushan for whom the petitioners are doing so. He said, ‘There are some aliens here which will not even raise their voice to remove their names from the voter list. They will not come to court. So Mr. Bhushan is doing all this for whom? ‘ Justice was hearing Suryakant’s bench case. Justice Suryakant said, “We do not want this matter to become an uncontrolled inquiry.”

What did the Election Commission say?
On these arguments of the petitioners, Election Commission counsel Rakesh Dwivedi said that information was given to every voter. He said that everyone is claiming anything, so an affidavit should be taken from them. Rakesh Dwivedi said that last time Yogendra Yadav had brought some people to court. No accountability is showing.

Rakesh Dwivedi said, ‘We have handed over the list to every political party. No person himself is coming to the Election Commission. NGOs sitting in Delhi are making noise. These people have not yet filed an application challenging the final list. They are arguing on the old petition. The election has been announced. We have to settle for this.

During this, Advocate Ashwin Upadhyay demanded from the court that all cases should be transferred to Patna High Court. Senior Advocate Vijay Hansariya said that here these petitioners say some things, then ‘vote theft’ is created outside.

Special intense of voter list running in Bihar Revision ,Sir) Supreme Court about Petitioners It is said that if it has been proved in September that the process is illegal, then it will be banned. The Supreme Court was told that five crore people are being investigated again and only a few months have been given. The court has said this on this.

By filing several petitions in the Supreme Court SIR The process has been challenged. It has been claimed that there are many disturbances in the process. Justice Suryakant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi The bench is hearing the case.

One Petitioner on behalf of Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Sedhavi Said, ,Voter in the year 2003 List Five crore people are being tested again? Gives a few months for this, On this, the Supreme Court said that Petitioner Worry Do not do If 5 crore people are dropped, then there is a court.

The Supreme Court said that the rule of deciding citizenship makes Parliament, but all follow the rules. Court Petitioners Said to, ,If you guys will also prove in September that the process is illegal, then we will stop it, The court also said that if needed, we will hear not only tomorrow but also the day after tomorrow. Will not give anyone a chance to complain that he was not heard.

SIR Congress leaders in those who have filed petitions about How VenugopalRajya Sabha MP Manoj Kumar JhaSocial worker Yogendra Yadav, Lok Sabha MP Mahua MoitraAdvocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay, Association For Democratic Reforms, PUCL And National Federation For Indian Woman Are included.

During the hearing Yogendra Yadav said that the number of adult people and the number of voters should be seen in a state. Wherever the citizen is asked to prove himself a voter instead of the government in the world, a large number of people List They are out of and these are poor people. Yogendra Yadav said that if someone has to contest elections and will tell him on 25 September that your name List What will he do if I am not This is the easiest way to exclude the opponent from the match.

Yogendra Yadav said that there are a large number of women who are being shown to be transferred, while men are more migrated. He said that removing 65 lakh people is very big The thing is, Yogendra Yadav showed a woman and man in court who drafts List I have been told dead. Election Commission lawyer Rakesh Dwivedi He opposed this and said that all this should be done in TV studios instead of court. He said that it is being shown here as if the sky has broken. Court also said that if someone’s name draft List If I am left in Final List Can come in This is not such a big thing.

(With the input of skilled Sehgal)