Us President Donald Trump: The 6-3 decision given by the Supreme Court of the US not only gave relief to President Donald Trump, but has also intensified the debate over the balance of power in the American constitutional system. The court clearly stated that the nationwide prohibitions issued by the judges of the district courts could be out of their legal limit.

Trump called it a tremendous victory and indicated that he would now re -implement all the policies that were earlier stayed by the courts. It also includes an order to abolish the citizenship received from birth, which was described by the courts as unconstitutional. This decision does not directly decide whether Trump’s order is valid or not, but it focuses on whether the same judge should have the right to stop any order for the whole country.

New definition of constitutional powers?

This decision limits the power of the judiciary, which was able to curb top officials like the President till now. Traditionally, the courts have issued nationwide prohibitions and maintained the policies of the executive in accordance with the constitution. Supreme Court Justice Amy Koni Barrett wrote in his majority judgment, “Federal Courts do not monitor the executive branch.” This statement makes it clear that the courts will now take care in stopping the policies, which can open the hands of the executive. While the disagreement of Justice Sonia Sotamayor is reflected in deep concern. He wrote, “There is no right in the new legal rule created by the court.”

Democrats raging on court order

Democratic leader Chak Shumar described the verdict as a terrible step towards totalitarianism. He feared that it would exclude leaders like Trump from judicial accountability. Democrats believe that Trump is already misusing executive powers and now this decision will give them more open exemption.

Trump’s disputed order attack on birthright citizen

Trump’s effort to end the birthright directly challenges the 14th amendment of the US Constitution, which clearly states that every person born in the US is an American citizen. Trump claims that this policy was made only for the children of slaves, while its scope is much wider than that. It was clarified in his order that if parents are living illegally or in America on visas, then their children will not get citizenship. This policy was already unconstitutional by the courts of states like Maryland, Massachusetts and Washington.

Also read: ‘I came to know just 5 minutes ago’, Shocking revelation of Usha, wife of US Vice President JD Vance

The US Supreme Court on Friday (June 27, 2025) has given a major victory to the President by curbing the power of federal judges to prevent the executive actions of Donald Trump.

With a 6-3 decision regarding Trump’s attempt to end congenital citizenship, the court said that the nationwide prohibition issued by the judges of the District Court is more than the just rights given by the Congress to the federal courts.

According to the AFP report, the US Supreme Court did not immediately pronounce the decision on the constitutionality of Trump’s executive order seeking abolition of citizenship for children born on American soil, but in the realm of judicial matters, the decision will remove a major obstruction for Trump’s often highly controversial orders and will increase the power of the White House further.

What did Justice Amy Kony Barrett say?
Justice Amy Koni Barrett said that the federal courts do not normalize the executive branch, but they resolve matters and disputes according to the rights given to them by the Congress. He said that when a court concludes that the executive branch has worked illegally, it does not mean to encroach its power for the court.

Three other judges disagreed with this decision. This decision will have far -reaching consequences for the judiciary’s ability to rein in Trump or future American presidents. The case was clearly about the executive order signed by Trump on the first day of his term, in which the birthright was abolished.

Trump’s order is considered unconstitutional by the courts of three states
Trump’s birth -based citizenship order has been considered unconstitutional by Maryland, Massachusetts and Washington State Courts, due to which the President has made an emergency appeal in the Supreme Court to cancel the nationwide prohibition.

The issue has become a slogan of the rally for Trump and his Republic associates, who accuse the judiciary of disrupting their agenda against the wishes of the voters. During the debate before the Supreme Court in May, both conservative and liberal judges had expressed concern about the increasing use of nationwide prohibitory orders on behalf of the District Courts in recent years.

Also read:

‘Election Commission is secretly implementing NRC in Bihar’, Asaduddin Owaisi spoke on voter list controversy

Us Supreme Court on Citizenship: US President Donald Trump has suffered a setback from the Supreme Court. The court has stayed the proposal to ban citizenship from the birth of Trump. However, the court has agreed to hear the arguments on the issue and it will be heard in May.

The US Supreme Court will not directly decide whether Trump’s decision is according to the constitution or not. At present, the court will pay attention to another technical matter, which can have a lot of impact later. The issue is whether judges of lower courts can order to stop the policies of the President across the country.

Court imposed stay

Three federal judges issued prohibitory orders to stop Trump’s order in different decisions, which was asked to end the citizenship of the US-born children. The judges said that this order is a direct violation of the 14th amendment, as this amendment gives the right of citizenship to almost all people born in America for a long time.

Last month, the Trump government filed an Arjency appeal in the Supreme Court. He asked the court to either be removed or reduced these prohibitions. The government said that the judges of the lower courts should not have the right to take such a big decision, so that any policy can be stopped in the whole country.

Hearing will be held on 15 May

The US Supreme Court on Thursday said in its order that it would hear on May 15. This hearing will be held on the issue whether the District Judges have the right to give orders to be implemented in the whole country. It is rare for the court to determine a debate on emergency appeals. This shows that the court is taking the matter of Trump administration seriously. If the Supreme Court agrees with Trump that the judges have given more orders than their rights, then this can allow the government to implement the policy related to its citizenship immediately in some areas.

Trump administration issued this order

Trump issued a new order on the first day of his second term, stating that the US-born children would not be given citizenship whose parents are in the country without legitimate paper or on a temporary visa.

But many legal experts say that this order is against the law. He says that this order collides with the old decisions of the Supreme Court and the 14th amendment of the Constitution. The 14th amendment states that any person who is born in America and is under the law of America will be considered a citizen of America.