Diljit dosanjh film Punjab 95: Diljit Dosanjh’s film Punjab 95 has been in controversy for a long time. This film is made on the true story of Jaswant Singh Khalra. Khalra was a human rights activist, who had put the truth of thousands of people in Punjab in front of everyone.

Censor board put 127 cuts

There is a lot of difficulty in passing this film from the censor board CBFC. The board has asked to cut 127 scenes in the film. On which the director of this film Honey Trehan told that if so many scenes are removed, then the real thing of the film will be over.

He said that if forced cuts are made, he will remove his name from the film. He further said that he has made this film with complete truth and honesty, and after so many cuts, this film will not remain a film.

CBFC has said that remove the word ‘Punjab’ in the name of the film. He also objected to saying ‘Punjab Police’ in the film and said that only ‘police’ should be written. Not only this, it has also been asked to remove the name of Indira Gandhi. On this, Trehan has questioned that – ‘If the story is from Punjab, then how to remove Punjab by name?’

Paramjit Kaur Khalra, wife of Jaswant Singh Khalra, has opposed the decision of the censor board. He said that this film is made up of family permission and nothing is wrong in it. Therefore, the film should be released without any cut.

Honey Trehan said that he has been waiting for the last two and a half years. He said that if we cannot say our talk through art, then what is the meaning of democracy?

Real point of film
This film is not on any politics, but shows the true battle of a human being. Jaswant Singh Khalra had revealed the reality of many missing people. The film shows the same struggle. Jaswant Singh Khalra had collected information about the missing of more than 25,000 people at that time and reported it at the international level. He was then abducted for this and was later murdered.

The purpose of this film is to bring his sacrifice to the people. Now it will be seen whether this film will be able to reach the audience in its true form or will the sensor remain entangled in the board’s restrictions?