AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi on Saturday (October 11, 2025) has given a big statement regarding joining the grand alliance for the upcoming Bihar assembly elections. He said that the Bihar President of our party had written a letter to RJD supremo Lalu Yadav. We had demanded 6 seats, but they did not agree, but we will contest the elections. This will reveal who wants to stop BJP. There is no question of getting angry. They will decide the strategy of their party. We will decide the strategy of our party.

In an interview given to news agency ANI, he said, ‘Big Maulanas, scholars, intellectuals, doctors and lawyers of Bihar all said that Owaisi does not want to do this. Then I reminded him that a month ago the Vice President election was held and who did we vote for? Now the same people are expressing regret and saying that your intentions are right.

Bihar Sir Owaisi raised questions regarding

Lok Sabha MP from Hyderabad Asaduddin Owaisi raised questions on the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the voter list being conducted by the Election Commission (ECI) in Bihar, saying, ‘First 6.5 lakh names were removed from the voter list. Now again 3.5 lakh names i.e. names of approximately 10 lakh voters have been removed from the list. This is a huge number and if people do not check on time, there can be chaos on the day of voting.

in bihar AIMIM Information given about the journey of

He said, ‘Our political journey in Bihar started from the land of Seemanchal. We said that there should be justice for Seemanchal. Seemanchal is underdeveloped. Secondly, there is misgovernance and corruption in Bihar; There are many issues. Every community, every caste has leadership, but about 19 percent of Muslims in Bihar lack leadership.

On BJP’s B team, Owaisi said, ‘If the opposition thinks that the disease will be cured by bringing Owaisi in everything, then I have no problem with it, but we have said many times and today we are saying again that if Narendra Modi has become the Prime Minister of this country thrice, then there is no fault of Indian Muslims in it. Prime Minister Narendra Modi is getting almost 50 percent non-Muslim votes in the elections. They are getting 37-38 percent votes, so what is my role in this? I don’t mind. If you think that bringing Owaisi into everything will cure the disease, then I have no problem with it. Introspect and see how weak you are.

He said, ‘We have no connection with BJP, but he is in the government, we will have to meet him, met Giriraj Singh for work, this is my duty as an MP. There was a terrorist attack in Pahalgam, if we went, we did not go for the PM but for the country. There has been no violence in Bareilly, the police lathicharged there, if someone expresses love then why does BJP have a problem, what happened in Bareilly is very wrong. There is a demand from the UP government to release the people soon.

What are Owaisi’s views on the allegations of vote theft?,

On Rahul Gandhi’s allegations and statements of vote theft, Owaisi said, ‘I cannot speak on behalf of Rahul Gandhi and his party. they are able. I believe that if I have to defeat BJP, then the way BJP fights elections, these people work 24 hours. Our job should be to keep an eye on their every move. You are competing with BJP. You can blink and these people will do their job, so obviously, we should check the voter list.

Said on Chidambaram’s statement on Mumbai attack AIMIM Chief

On the statement of former Union Minister P. Chidambaram on 26/11 Mumbai attacks, Owaisi said, ‘The government’s strategy was different at that time. Today’s strategy is different. Therefore, they were the ruling party. Therefore that party should confirm it. We support Operation Sindoor and we also believe that if we expect Pakistan Army and Pakistan’s ISI that they will not commit any misdeeds after Operation Sindoor, then we are making a mistake. If not today then tomorrow they will commit misdeeds again. We need to be cautious on this issue.

On the ceasefire in Gaza and Israel, Owaisi said, ‘What will the western powers do in this committee, they are praising the Indian PM and Israeli PM, they killed 65 thousand people.’ At the same time, on the visit of the Foreign Minister of Afghanistan, he said that we welcome it. We should have relations with them, I had said in 2016 that we should talk to Taliban.

Owaisi’s counterattack on Amit Shah’s statement and bulldozer action

He said that the statement given by Amit Shah on population is absolutely wrong. Amit Shah is weak in mathematics. On bulldozer action, Owaisi said, ‘This is completely wrong. The decisions given under the guidelines of the Supreme Court are not being followed at all. You are bringing down entire houses. Not just one, not two. You are demolishing 10, 20 houses. BJP had a minister named Teni. Did they demolish his house? No. Many such examples can be given. Therefore, you cannot run the country with a bulldozer; It can be run through the Constitution.

CJI Trying to throw shoes on Gawai is an insult to Dalits – Owaisi

He said on CJI BR Gavai, ‘The entire Supreme Court has been insulted. A shoe was thrown. The question is not about them. The question is about beating of Dalits. NCRB 2023 figures have just arrived. Every day 12 Dalit women are raped. Most crimes against Dalits take place in Uttar Pradesh. Two boys jumped into Parliament, UAPA was imposed on them. The gentleman is 70 years old. The wrong message that went across the country was that someone threw a shoe in the court of the Chief Justice of India and the government gave a muted response, a completely cold response, what is the Delhi Police doing? If his name had not been Kishore, but Asad, what would he have done by now? This is racism, this is communism. Therefore the message that is being sent is very wrong. He has been made a hero on social media.

Also read: ‘PM Modi is Trump’s special friend’, Sergio Gore met the Prime Minister and sent this special message

AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi has launched a scathing attack on Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his government over the alleged attempt to attack the Chief Justice of India (CJI). Asaduddin Owaisi, on behalf of lawyer Rakesh Kishore, has accused the government of being biased on the basis of religion in this case regarding the attack on CJI BR Gavai and is not taking strict action against the accused.

Asaduddin Owaisi, Lok Sabha MP from Hyderabad, said, ‘If his (lawyer who tried to throw the shoe) name was not Rakesh Kishore and it was Asad, what would the police have done? People of the Bharatiya Janata Party would say, ‘Pick him up!’, ‘He has come from the neighboring country’, ‘He is from the Pakistani intelligence department ISI’. He would then be attacked from all sides.

Police and government accused of adopting double standards

AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi gave this statement while addressing a gathering. Which he has also shared with his X handle. Owaisi has accused the Delhi Police and the Central Government of adopting a double standard on the basis of religious identity in the case of the alleged attack on lawyer Rakesh Kishore. Along with this, he compared this incident with the recent incident in Bareilly district of Uttar Pradesh.

Why was a case not registered against the person who threw shoes at India’s second Dalit Chief Justice of India?pic.twitter.com/WUd9pHhmwO

— Asaduddin Owaisi (@asadowaisi) October 7, 2025

He said, ‘When the Muslim community had protested against the removal of I Love Mohammed banners, the UP Police had taken immediate action, whereas this did not happen in the case of Rakesh Kishore. Rakesh Kishore, while mentioning Bareilly in the list of his complaints against the CJI, had said that CJI BR Gavai and the Supreme Court should not have commented against the bulldozer justice policy of Yogi Adityanath.

Owaisi made a direct attack on Prime Minister Modi

AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi directly attacked Prime Minister Narendra Modi regarding this incident. He said, ‘Tell me Modi ji, are your government and your policies not responsible for this? These are the same people to whom your government has given power. He said, ‘It is the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the Central Government that have filled the hearts of such people with poison.’

Owaisi said, ‘Even today that Rakesh Kishore says that he does not care about anything. Prime Minister, Delhi Police comes under you and you just give a statement that this is very wrong. He stressed, ‘Even though CJI BR Gavai himself has decided not to register any case, the Prime Minister should have taken suo motu legal action, mere condemnation should not have sufficed.’

Also read: ‘Serious issue, but Parliament will have to decide’, Delhi HC sends notice to Center regarding transgender rights.

Chief Justice of India (CJI) BR Gawai said on Tuesday (September 23, 2025) that his decision on bulldozer action has given him a lot of satisfaction as it deal with human problems. Supreme Court Justice Gawai and Justice K.V. Vishwanathan’s bench had compared Bulldozer Justice to an chaotic situation on November 13, 2024 and set guidelines for the country.

At a reception ceremony organized by an academic group of lawyers of the Supreme Court lawyers on Friday (September 19, 2025), CJI Gavai said that he had the opportunity to share his back with Justice Vishwanathan for about six months.

He said, ‘I think the decision related to bulldozers is one of the decisions that gave us excessive satisfaction. At the core of this decision, there were human problems and problems faced by humans. The family was being harassed only because its members are either criminals or perceived criminals.

CJI BR Gawai appreciated former Chief Justice

Chief Justice BR Gavai said, ‘Though the credit goes to him, but the equal credit for writing this decision should also be known to Justice Vishwanathan. The tenure of CJI does not affect justice administration.

The CJI said, ‘I do not think the tenure of the Chief Justice has a direct connection with the efficiency of the administration. We have been the best Chief Justice like Justice Lalit and Justice Sanjeev Khanna for two and a half months, who have left their mark and are known for their contribution to justice and (justice) administration. He made his best attempt to improve the betterment of justice and improve the infrastructure of the judiciary across the country.

He said, “I have tried every moment to improve the betterment of justice administration and to improve the judicial infrastructure across the country and ensure that appointments in High Courts should quickly reach the logical conclusion.”

Efforts made to give good representation to young lawyers- CJI

According to the CJI, an attempt has been made to give good representation to the young lawyers who are advocating in the Supreme Court in the last few years. He said, “We are confident that the rich experience he gets in the Supreme Court actually helps to bring efficiency or increase it at the high court level.”

Also read: ‘If you want to live in politics, then why did the Delhi High Court say on the petition of BJP spokesperson Gaurav Bhatia?

On an important question related to Muslim will, the Supreme Court has issued a notice to the Central Government. In the petition, the petition has also demanded to bring Muslims under sections 58 (1) and 57 of the Indian Supplies Act. The petitioner has opposed the system of Muslim personal law, under which a person can do only one third of the property. Approval of legal heirs is necessary for the will of the rest of the property.

Muslim Personal Law violates the fundamental right of religious freedom: Petition

The petition of Kerala, who is advocating in Abu Dhabi, stated that the Holy Quran allows Muslims for a will, but limits the Muslim personal law applicable in India. This provision of personal law is not according to the Quran. In such a situation, it violates the fundamental right to religious freedom found under Article 25 of the Constitution. It also violates Article 14, 15 (right to equality), 21 (right to life) and 300A (right to property).

Father cannot give equal property to sons to daughters: petition

The petitioner has said that in modern times boys and girls are being seen with equality, but if a Muslim father wants to give equal property to his sons and daughters, he cannot do so. Muslim personal law prevents him from doing so. At present, one -third of the property has the right to the will. Supreme Court Justice P.S. Narasimha and A. S. Chandurkar’s bench accepted the petition for hearing after a short debate. The court said that it will hear this petition with a petition already pending on this subject.

Also read: Will you be the Vice Presidential candidate from the opposition? DMK’s Tiruchi Shiva gave this answer

The Supreme Court has recently given an important message to the whole society, giving a historic verdict. The Supreme Court, while giving a verdict in a divorce case, made it clear that any women who are financially capable, they should try to become self -sufficient instead of asking their husbands for their living allowances. The court has said this especially about those cases of divorce, in which the couple has been married very short.

According to the report of the bar and bench, this remark of the Supreme Court came during the hearing of a high-profile alimony (Elimani) case. The woman involved in the case was an IT professional and also had an MBA degree. The woman was married only 18 months. The woman separated from her husband and demanded a large amount of 12 crore as alimony, an expensive apartment in Mumbai and an BMW car. The people present in the court were surprised to hear about this demand of the woman.

A bench of three judges including the Chief Justice heard the case

Hearing of this case in the Supreme Court, Chief Justice of India (CJI) BR Gawai, Justice K.K. Vinod Chandran and Justice NV. Anjaria’s three -judge bench did it. CJI BR Gavai also underlined her educational and professional background while commenting on the woman’s petition during the hearing of the case and said, “You are an IT professional. You have also done an MBA. Why do you not work if you have demand in cities like Bengaluru and Hyderabad?”

CJI raised questions on the woman’s petition

CJI Gawai commented on the property and alimony sought by the woman keeping in mind the short time of the couple’s marriage. He said, “This marriage lasted only 18 months and you are demanding one crore rupees for every month?”

CJI raised the question and said, “Is this right from anywhere, if someone wants a person of such a high standard, but without trying to make himself financially strong and self -sufficient without him?”

If the woman replied, the court gave two options

On the question of CJI, the woman replied in the court, saying that her husband is rich and had filed a petition to cancel the marriage on the basis of mental illness like schizophrenia. After hearing the woman’s answer, the court gave them two options. The court said, “Either he accept a flat free from any legal stake or make this agreement with a lump sum of 4 crores.”

According to the report of the bar and bench, the CJI reiterated his point and said to the woman, “You are educated. You should not depend on others. You should earn yourself and live your life with respect.”

Also read: Amit Shah said that English speakers will be ashamed, Rahul Gandhi’s answer- English is the most powerful language

CJI Br gavai in prayagraj: Chief Justice of India Justice BR Gavai credited the constitution for the solidarity of the country on Saturday (May 30, 2025). He said that whenever there has been a crisis on the country, he faced him with strength and solidarity and the credit should be given to the Constitution.

CJI BR Gavai said this in the inaugural program of newly constructed advocate Chamber Bhavan and multi -level parking in the Allahabad High Court at a cost of Rs 680 crore. CJI Gavai, the chief guest of the program, said, “The fundamental duty of the judiciary is to reach the last citizen of the country who needs justice and the same duty of the legislature and the executive.”

India’s Chief Justice BR Gavai said, “Meghwal ji (Minister of Law and Justice) said that (CM) Yogi ji is the most powerful and hardworking CM of this country. I would like to say that Allahabad is the land of powerful people.”

Legislature, executive and judiciary contributed to bring social equality- CJI

The Chief Justice said, “Whenever there was a crisis, India remained united and strong. The credit should be given to the Constitution. In the 75 -year journey of the Indian Constitution, the legislature, executive and judiciary have made a big contribution in bringing social and economic equality. Many such laws were brought in which land was given to landless persons by taking land from land.”

He said, “These laws were also challenged from time to time. Before 1973, the Supreme Court had the idea that there will be a situation of conflict between the Directive Principles (Directive Principal) and the fundamental rights, then the fundamental right will be up. Does not have the right. “

Both Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles Spirit of Constitution- CJI

The Chief Justice said, “A bench of 13 judges of 1973 also said that both Fundamental Rights and Policy Principles are the souls of the Constitution. Both of them are two wheels of the golden chariot of the Constitution, out of which the whole chariot will stop if one wheel stops.”

He said, “I have always said that bar and bench are two aspects of a coin. Until the bar and bench work together, the chariot of justice cannot be pushed forward. Today the Allahabad High Court has given a good ideal for the whole country, in which judges vacated 12 bungalows and took care of the convenience of their lawyer brothers.”

State and central government always ready to solve the problem of advocate- CM Yogi

Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath, the distinguished guest of the program, said, “The state and central government is constantly trying to overcome the problems of the advocates. A proposal has been approved to build campus in seven districts in this direction and Rs 1,700 crore has been released for this.”

The Chief Minister said, “The government has increased the amount of advocate fund from Rs 1.5 lakh to Rs five lakh and the age limit of its eligible advocates has also been increased from 60 years to 70 years. For this, a fund of Rs 500 crore has also been given.”

CM Yogi underlined the role of High Court in organizing Mahakumbh

Underlining the role of the High Court in organizing the Prayagraj Mahakumbh, Yogi Adityanath said, “The event of Prayagraj Mahakumbh could be so successful because the Allahabad High Court did not stay any project.”

Justice Suryakanth of the Supreme Court, Justice Vikram Nath, Justice JK Maheshwari, Justice Pankaj Mithil, Justice Manoj Mishra, Union Law and Justice Minister Arjunram Meghwal, Allahabad High Court Chief Justice Arun Bhansali and Chief Justice of Delhi High Court DK Upadhyay were also present at the inauguration ceremony.

Multiple parking made in Allahabad High Court

Multilavel parking constructed in the Allahabad High Court has parking capacity of 3,835 vehicles as well as 2,366 chambers. Five floors including underground floors and surface of this 14 -storey building are reserved for parking. At the same time, six floors are dedicated to the advocates’ chamber. 26 lifts, 28 escalators and four travelers have been built in this building.

Supreme Court CJI on Waqf Amendment Act: The Supreme Court heard the petitions challenging the constitutionality of the Waqf Amendment Act 2025 on Tuesday (May 20, 2025). The petitions were heard by a two -member bench headed by Chief Justice of India Bhushan Ramakrishna Gavai, including Justice Augustin George Christ along with CJI. While hearing the petitions, Chief Justice of India BR Gawai has drawn a Laxman Rekha, making a big comment about the constitutionality of laws passed by Parliament.

Hearing the petitions challenging the constitutionality of the Waqf Amendment Act, 2025, the CJI told the petitioners, “There is a notion of constitutionality of laws after passing from Parliament and no law is constitutional, unless a concrete and concrete case is revealed in this regard, the courts cannot interfere in this regard.”

Central government appeals to Supreme Court

The central government has also made an appeal to the Supreme Court regarding this matter. The central government has told the Supreme Court to limit the hearing on the petitions challenging the validity of the law, including the rights of boards to de-detail the Waqf properties declared by the court, user and the deed. On behalf of the Center, Solitary General Tushar Mehta made this request before the bench of Chief Justice BR Gavai and Justice Augustine George Christ. However, on this demand of the central government, the petitioners’ counsel Kapil Sibal lodged an objection in the court.

Kapil Sibal and Abhishek Singhvi objected to the demand of the center

Senior advocates Kapil Sibal and Abhishek Singhvi, appearing for the petitioners, opposed the argument of the Center in the court, saying, “No important law cannot be heard in pieces.” Kapil Sibal, while arguing, said, ‘The amended law violates Article 25 of the Constitution, under which people gives people the right to follow religion, to conduct and propagate religion. Therefore, we will argue on all issues. He said, “The matter should be heard to issue an interim order.”