An attempt was made to throw the shoe over the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the country, BR Gawai. In the court, a lawyer created a ruckus, allegedly throwing a shoe over the judge, committing a ruckus. Other lawyers present there have confirmed this. Meanwhile, after this incident, Samajwadi Party national president Akhilesh Yadav has given his response by tweeting. He has said that, by going into the hands of some people, the shoe also feels insulted himself. At present, his tweet is being discussed fiercely.

Akhilesh Yadav made this tweet

The SP chief wrote in his tweet, such rude people who insult the PDA society are actually due to their arrogance and ego. His dominated thinking gives rise to hatred, which is as much for the person sitting in the highest judicial post of the country, as much as the weakest last person of the society. Such people suffer from domination disease. Akhilesh wrote, that’s why we say, PDA means ‘victims, sad, humiliated’. PDA has been forgiving such people for 5000 years of generosity and well -being of society, but after insult to this extent, the PDA society will not bear any more.

Akhilesh attacked BJP

Akhilesh Yadav, as an attacker on the BJP, wrote that, the BJP and its Sanghi-parties are in the final stages of their power, because their corrupt electoral conspiracy has been busted, they will never win now. That is why they are doing such some things desperate.

Further, he told in the tweet, if the BJP goes this time, he will never come again. When 90% of the population has woken up for its rights, then 10% Gurur and the throne will not last. In the socio-political history of India, this period is of the struggle for ‘insults versus honors’. The PDA will win this final struggle of its self -respect and self -respect.

A shocking incident came to light on Monday (October 6) in the Supreme Court.CJI) B.R. Gawai was hearing a case when a lawyer CJI BR tried to throw a shoe at Gawai. Now the reaction of Congress MP Imran Masood has come out on this matter.

Congress MP Imran Masood has said that It will be written on the black day in the history of the country, the son of a Dalit has become a CJI, he is not liked. Congress MP said that To abuse such as Dalits and Muslims. They said that Do these people want to take the country in the Stone Age? The country will run through the Constitution, everyone’s rights within the Constitution are protected. Only your right is not your right, why are you humiliating all. Sanatan is the religion of love, you are spreading hatred.

UP is number one in oppression of Dalits and Muslims- Imran Masood

Congress MP there Imran masood Done On the events of Uttar Pradesh Where I am saying what I am saying, saying with proof. The way girls have been beaten and murdered in Rae Bareli. Uttar Pradesh is number one in the oppression of Dalits and Muslims. If someone shows the poster, then you break the hands and feet, run the bulldozer at his house. No guideline is being followed. They are also cheating the Supreme Court.

Bihar elections should be held under the supervision of Supreme Court- Imran Masood

Along with this, Congress MP Imran Masood also reacted to the announcement of Bihar elections today. Congress MP said that all the attacks we replied on the Election Commission BJP Gave Their alliance is clearly visible, we want the elections to be completed under the supervision of the Supreme Court, we will also monitor.

Chief Justice of India (CJI) BR Gawai said on Tuesday (September 23, 2025) that his decision on bulldozer action has given him a lot of satisfaction as it deal with human problems. Supreme Court Justice Gawai and Justice K.V. Vishwanathan’s bench had compared Bulldozer Justice to an chaotic situation on November 13, 2024 and set guidelines for the country.

At a reception ceremony organized by an academic group of lawyers of the Supreme Court lawyers on Friday (September 19, 2025), CJI Gavai said that he had the opportunity to share his back with Justice Vishwanathan for about six months.

He said, ‘I think the decision related to bulldozers is one of the decisions that gave us excessive satisfaction. At the core of this decision, there were human problems and problems faced by humans. The family was being harassed only because its members are either criminals or perceived criminals.

CJI BR Gawai appreciated former Chief Justice

Chief Justice BR Gavai said, ‘Though the credit goes to him, but the equal credit for writing this decision should also be known to Justice Vishwanathan. The tenure of CJI does not affect justice administration.

The CJI said, ‘I do not think the tenure of the Chief Justice has a direct connection with the efficiency of the administration. We have been the best Chief Justice like Justice Lalit and Justice Sanjeev Khanna for two and a half months, who have left their mark and are known for their contribution to justice and (justice) administration. He made his best attempt to improve the betterment of justice and improve the infrastructure of the judiciary across the country.

He said, “I have tried every moment to improve the betterment of justice administration and to improve the judicial infrastructure across the country and ensure that appointments in High Courts should quickly reach the logical conclusion.”

Efforts made to give good representation to young lawyers- CJI

According to the CJI, an attempt has been made to give good representation to the young lawyers who are advocating in the Supreme Court in the last few years. He said, “We are confident that the rich experience he gets in the Supreme Court actually helps to bring efficiency or increase it at the high court level.”

Also read: ‘If you want to live in politics, then why did the Delhi High Court say on the petition of BJP spokesperson Gaurav Bhatia?

Chief Justice of India (CJI) BR Gawai spoke with impunity against the bulldozer policy of the governments. CJI attended a program organized by Goa High Court Bar Association on Saturday (August 23, 2025) in Goa’s capital Panaji.

During this, while addressing the function, he said that he is happy that the Supreme Court’s decision against the demolition of the houses of the accused persons without following the legal process has upheld the rights of the citizens.

‘Executive cannot become a judge’
BR Gawai was part of the bench of the Supreme Court, which immediately criticized the ‘bulldozer justice’ and set guidelines for the demolition of the assets for the country. It was said in the judgment that the executive cannot become a judge and cannot declare any accused guilty nor can his house be dropped.

‘My decision was criticized by the people of my own community’
Addressing the function, the Chief Justice of the country also explained the argument behind his historical decision on ‘Creamy layer’ in the reserved category. Gawai said, “My decision was criticized by the people of my own community, but I always believe that I should write my decision not according to the wishes or pressure of the people, but on the basis of the understanding of the law and the voice of my conscience.”

Pointing to the speeches made by the former speakers during the honor ceremony, pointing to their historical decisions, CJI Gavai said, “I really are happy that as the patron of the Constitution we could do something to protect the rights of the citizens whose houses were demolished without following legal processes.”

Also read

Nikki murder case: 14 days judicial custody to main accused Vipin, mother -in -law arrested, know what happened so far

The Supreme Court has ordered the immediate closure of the hand rickshaw running in Matheran, the hill station of Maharashtra. Describing it as inhuman, the court asked the state government to make a policy to provide e-rickshaws to those who run hand rickshaws. He should consider adopting an e-rickshaw system like Kevadia in Gujarat.

India’s Chief Justice BR Gawai wrote an order on behalf of a three -judge bench, saying, “No person draws the other by his own will. He does this because he has no other means of living, but such a trend is against human dignity. It will be a matter of downs to degrade the constitutional promise of social and economic justice.”

Supreme Court mentioned a historic decision of 1980

The court in its order has mentioned the 1980 historic ‘Azad Rickshaw Polers Association vs Punjab’ verdict. In that decision, many instructions were given to give dignified lives to the rickshaws. The Chief Justice said, “It is unfortunate to continue the hand rickshaw even after 78 years of independence, 75 years of the constitution and 45 years after this historic decision.”

It has been said in the order that the state government will have to formulate a policy to provide e-rickshaws to the people. She cannot avoid it by making an excuse for lack of funds. The court has given this order in a case related to environment and forest conservation.

The Supreme Court had instructed the state government to form an e-rickshaw policy in February

In fact, due to Matheran being an environmentally sensitive area, there is a ban on running petrol and diesel vehicles there. In such a situation, there is a means of rickshaw traffic for tourists and local people there. In view of the previous orders of the Supreme Court, some e-rickshaws have been made available there. In February this year, the Supreme Court asked the Maharashtra government to form an e-rickshaw policy in 6 months. Now the court has immediately stopped the hand rickshaw.

Also read: ‘India’s contribution more than America’, RBI Governor’s first reaction on Trump’s dead economy statement

The Supreme Court has recently given an important message to the whole society, giving a historic verdict. The Supreme Court, while giving a verdict in a divorce case, made it clear that any women who are financially capable, they should try to become self -sufficient instead of asking their husbands for their living allowances. The court has said this especially about those cases of divorce, in which the couple has been married very short.

According to the report of the bar and bench, this remark of the Supreme Court came during the hearing of a high-profile alimony (Elimani) case. The woman involved in the case was an IT professional and also had an MBA degree. The woman was married only 18 months. The woman separated from her husband and demanded a large amount of 12 crore as alimony, an expensive apartment in Mumbai and an BMW car. The people present in the court were surprised to hear about this demand of the woman.

A bench of three judges including the Chief Justice heard the case

Hearing of this case in the Supreme Court, Chief Justice of India (CJI) BR Gawai, Justice K.K. Vinod Chandran and Justice NV. Anjaria’s three -judge bench did it. CJI BR Gavai also underlined her educational and professional background while commenting on the woman’s petition during the hearing of the case and said, “You are an IT professional. You have also done an MBA. Why do you not work if you have demand in cities like Bengaluru and Hyderabad?”

CJI raised questions on the woman’s petition

CJI Gawai commented on the property and alimony sought by the woman keeping in mind the short time of the couple’s marriage. He said, “This marriage lasted only 18 months and you are demanding one crore rupees for every month?”

CJI raised the question and said, “Is this right from anywhere, if someone wants a person of such a high standard, but without trying to make himself financially strong and self -sufficient without him?”

If the woman replied, the court gave two options

On the question of CJI, the woman replied in the court, saying that her husband is rich and had filed a petition to cancel the marriage on the basis of mental illness like schizophrenia. After hearing the woman’s answer, the court gave them two options. The court said, “Either he accept a flat free from any legal stake or make this agreement with a lump sum of 4 crores.”

According to the report of the bar and bench, the CJI reiterated his point and said to the woman, “You are educated. You should not depend on others. You should earn yourself and live your life with respect.”

Also read: Amit Shah said that English speakers will be ashamed, Rahul Gandhi’s answer- English is the most powerful language

CJI Br gavai in prayagraj: Chief Justice of India Justice BR Gavai credited the constitution for the solidarity of the country on Saturday (May 30, 2025). He said that whenever there has been a crisis on the country, he faced him with strength and solidarity and the credit should be given to the Constitution.

CJI BR Gavai said this in the inaugural program of newly constructed advocate Chamber Bhavan and multi -level parking in the Allahabad High Court at a cost of Rs 680 crore. CJI Gavai, the chief guest of the program, said, “The fundamental duty of the judiciary is to reach the last citizen of the country who needs justice and the same duty of the legislature and the executive.”

India’s Chief Justice BR Gavai said, “Meghwal ji (Minister of Law and Justice) said that (CM) Yogi ji is the most powerful and hardworking CM of this country. I would like to say that Allahabad is the land of powerful people.”

Legislature, executive and judiciary contributed to bring social equality- CJI

The Chief Justice said, “Whenever there was a crisis, India remained united and strong. The credit should be given to the Constitution. In the 75 -year journey of the Indian Constitution, the legislature, executive and judiciary have made a big contribution in bringing social and economic equality. Many such laws were brought in which land was given to landless persons by taking land from land.”

He said, “These laws were also challenged from time to time. Before 1973, the Supreme Court had the idea that there will be a situation of conflict between the Directive Principles (Directive Principal) and the fundamental rights, then the fundamental right will be up. Does not have the right. “

Both Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles Spirit of Constitution- CJI

The Chief Justice said, “A bench of 13 judges of 1973 also said that both Fundamental Rights and Policy Principles are the souls of the Constitution. Both of them are two wheels of the golden chariot of the Constitution, out of which the whole chariot will stop if one wheel stops.”

He said, “I have always said that bar and bench are two aspects of a coin. Until the bar and bench work together, the chariot of justice cannot be pushed forward. Today the Allahabad High Court has given a good ideal for the whole country, in which judges vacated 12 bungalows and took care of the convenience of their lawyer brothers.”

State and central government always ready to solve the problem of advocate- CM Yogi

Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath, the distinguished guest of the program, said, “The state and central government is constantly trying to overcome the problems of the advocates. A proposal has been approved to build campus in seven districts in this direction and Rs 1,700 crore has been released for this.”

The Chief Minister said, “The government has increased the amount of advocate fund from Rs 1.5 lakh to Rs five lakh and the age limit of its eligible advocates has also been increased from 60 years to 70 years. For this, a fund of Rs 500 crore has also been given.”

CM Yogi underlined the role of High Court in organizing Mahakumbh

Underlining the role of the High Court in organizing the Prayagraj Mahakumbh, Yogi Adityanath said, “The event of Prayagraj Mahakumbh could be so successful because the Allahabad High Court did not stay any project.”

Justice Suryakanth of the Supreme Court, Justice Vikram Nath, Justice JK Maheshwari, Justice Pankaj Mithil, Justice Manoj Mishra, Union Law and Justice Minister Arjunram Meghwal, Allahabad High Court Chief Justice Arun Bhansali and Chief Justice of Delhi High Court DK Upadhyay were also present at the inauguration ceremony.

Multiple parking made in Allahabad High Court

Multilavel parking constructed in the Allahabad High Court has parking capacity of 3,835 vehicles as well as 2,366 chambers. Five floors including underground floors and surface of this 14 -storey building are reserved for parking. At the same time, six floors are dedicated to the advocates’ chamber. 26 lifts, 28 escalators and four travelers have been built in this building.

Justice Abhay Oka on Supreme Court: Justice Abhay Oka has demanded a reform in the Supreme Court. They say that the Supreme Court is the Chief Justice centered and needs a change. Justice Abhay Oka was the last day as a judge on Friday (May 23, 2025). In his farewell speech, he also indicated that these changes can be made by Chief Justice BR Gavai.

Speaking at his farewell ceremony organized by the Supreme Court Bar Association, Justice Oka said that the High Court works more democratically than the Supreme Court. He said, “High court works through committees, while the Supreme Court is focused on the Chief Justice. It needs a change. You will see this change with the new Chief Justice.”

‘Chief Justice Sanjeev Khanna showed the path of transparency’

He added, “I am very happy that Chief Justice Sanjeev Khanna (who retired on May 13) pushed us forward on the path of transparency. He took decisions by confidence of every judge of the Supreme Court. Justice Gawai’s blood has democratic values.” Justice Oka also said that the Supreme Court and the High Court have ignored the trial court.

He said, “We should also think about the trial court and the common man. There are many cases pending in our trial and district courts … Never call the trial court a subordinate court. It is against constitutional values ​​… It is a difficult task to punish someone after 20 years.”

Justice Abhay Oka remembered his journey like this

Recalling his judicial visit, Justice Oka said that many people had asked him how he felt after leaving the post. To this, he said, “The judges have the freedom to do justice and when you are not a judge, you do not get that freedom. After 21 years and 9 months and after being a judge of three constitutional courts, the post of the judge becomes life and life becomes the post of judge.”

‘Never given a disagreement decision’

He said, “When a successful lawyer becomes a judge, he says that he has to sacrifice. I do not accept it. When you join the judiciary, you do not get that income, but the work you get cannot be compared to the lawyer’s income. I have never given a disagreeable decision in my long innings as a judge.”

Also read: Delhi government withdrew 7 petitions from the Supreme Court, the previous AAP government filed cases due to dispute with the Center

Supreme Court CJI on Waqf Amendment Act: The Supreme Court heard the petitions challenging the constitutionality of the Waqf Amendment Act 2025 on Tuesday (May 20, 2025). The petitions were heard by a two -member bench headed by Chief Justice of India Bhushan Ramakrishna Gavai, including Justice Augustin George Christ along with CJI. While hearing the petitions, Chief Justice of India BR Gawai has drawn a Laxman Rekha, making a big comment about the constitutionality of laws passed by Parliament.

Hearing the petitions challenging the constitutionality of the Waqf Amendment Act, 2025, the CJI told the petitioners, “There is a notion of constitutionality of laws after passing from Parliament and no law is constitutional, unless a concrete and concrete case is revealed in this regard, the courts cannot interfere in this regard.”

Central government appeals to Supreme Court

The central government has also made an appeal to the Supreme Court regarding this matter. The central government has told the Supreme Court to limit the hearing on the petitions challenging the validity of the law, including the rights of boards to de-detail the Waqf properties declared by the court, user and the deed. On behalf of the Center, Solitary General Tushar Mehta made this request before the bench of Chief Justice BR Gavai and Justice Augustine George Christ. However, on this demand of the central government, the petitioners’ counsel Kapil Sibal lodged an objection in the court.

Kapil Sibal and Abhishek Singhvi objected to the demand of the center

Senior advocates Kapil Sibal and Abhishek Singhvi, appearing for the petitioners, opposed the argument of the Center in the court, saying, “No important law cannot be heard in pieces.” Kapil Sibal, while arguing, said, ‘The amended law violates Article 25 of the Constitution, under which people gives people the right to follow religion, to conduct and propagate religion. Therefore, we will argue on all issues. He said, “The matter should be heard to issue an interim order.”

Supreme court hearing on waqf act: On Tuesday (May 20, 2025), several petitions challenged the new Waqf Act were heard in the Supreme Court. During this, CJI BR Gawai, while referring to a temple in Khajuraho, said that the temple is under the patronage of the Archaeological Department and still people can go and worship there. On this, Kapil Sibal argued that the new law says that if this ASI is a protected area then it cannot be a waqf.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta put the side of the government in front of the bench of CJI BR Gawai and Justice AG Christ. He said that in the beginning three points were fixed. We responded to three, but the parties have also mentioned different issues from these three issues. I think the court should focus on just three issues. However, Kapil Sibal opposed the Solicitor General and said that we will argue on all issues.

What did Kapil Sibal say while arguing?

Kapil Sibal, while arguing, said that in the last hearing it was said that if the interim order needs to be issued, the court will issue. On this, SG Tushar Mehta read the previous order before the court. The Solicitor General, while reading the order, said that the government has given undertaking that the role of the board members, the role of Waqf by user and DM was talked about. These were the three issues on which the government gave undertaking.

On this matter of Solicitor General, Sibal said that hearing should be held on issuing interim order in this matter. On this, it was said by the Supreme Court that the hearing of the case should be carried forward.

‘These institutions run with charity’

Sibal said that it is illegal and is going to take away the control of Waqf property. The property to be vowed will be investigated with the possibility of any dispute. The collector will investigate and the collector is a government man. In such a situation, there is no time limit for investigation. Until the report comes, the property cannot be wakf. Whereas property is given in the name of Allah. Once it was done, it was done forever. The government cannot provide financial help in it. Sibal further said that there is no offering in mosques like temples. These institutions run with charity.

On this, the court asked that there is a climb in the dargahs. Sibal said that I am talking about mosques, the dargah is different. He said that there is a offering in temples, but not in mosques and this is ‘Waqf by user’. The Babri Masjid was also like this. There were different provisions from 1923 to 1954, but the basic principles were the same.

Sibal further said, “The new law says that as soon as any building is declared an ancient protected monument under the ASI Act, the right to Waqf will be eliminated. The new law provides that a person adopting Islam through conversion can not make the Waqf Waqf before 5 years. This provision is completely unconstitutional. This provision is completely unconstitutional. Earlier people were selected and all Muslims were rejected. Now can be non -Muslims. “

When Khajuraho was mentioned during the hearing

On this, the CJI said that there is a temple in Khajuraho under the patronage of the Archaeological Department, yet people can go there and worship. On this, Sibal argued that the new law says that if this ASI is a protected area then it cannot be a waqf.

The bench asked if it takes away your right to follow religion? Can you not go there and pray? Sibal said that yes, it states that the declaration of Waqf property is zero. If it is zero then how can I go there? The CJI further said, “I visited the temple, which is under ASI, but devotees can go and worship there. So does such an announcement take away your right to worship?”

Sibal said that if you say that Waqf is zero then it is no longer Waqf. I say that this provision violates Article 25. There is no judicial process and then you force Waqf to go to court and challenge the collector’s decision and as long as the decision comes, the property is no longer the Waqf.

Also read: ‘There is no offering here like temples’, CJI Gavai said on Kapil Sibal’s argument but I have seen in the dargahs …