CJI Surya Kant participated as the keynote speaker in an event at the University of London. In such a situation, there was a heated debate among the people. Some people were trying to ask him questions about the alleged suppression of dissent in India, when the anchor said such a question was off topic.

The CJI delivered a lecture on Artificial Intelligence and International Law at Birkbeck College, University of London. During this time questions were asked and students shouted. give us some respect please The video has surfaced. This video is during the interactive session. This has been shared by CJP Chief Spokesperson Saurav Das.

Also read: Firhad Hakim Resignation: ‘This is not just a chair, it is a big responsibility’, Firhad Hakim became emotional after leaving the post of Mayor.

What’s in the video?

The conversation in the video that has been shared is very tense. A person attending an event here told the CJI that His Lordship has made many important points about India’s track record in protecting democracy related to AI. Now we are hearing from many legal observers at the national and international level that there is great concern about the increasing hostility towards dissent in India.

London, United Kingdom: Chief Justice of India Surya Kant delivered the inaugural address at the 4th International Conference on “Arbitrating Indo-UK Commercial Disputes: ADR as a Catalyst for Strengthening India-UK Economic Partnership” at Church House Westminster, London. The… pic.twitter.com/qmTAH2CsTf

— IANS (@ians_india) June 5, 2026

He said that it seems that this hostility is visible to some extent in His Lordship’s speech also. It has been publicized very well. On this, the anchor who was conducting the event said that with all respect I regret that I will not be able to raise this question. This topic is related to AI and International Law. Very sorry. I am very sorry. We have to edit it. CJI Kant is on a six-day UK tour.

Explained: Long history of paper leaks but why limited punishment? How only a few accused reach the dock and most escape

After independence, when the country adopted its Constitution and the Supreme Court was established on 26 January 1950, a new era of justice began. On this historic day, India got its first Chief Justice, Justice HJ Kania.

Justice Kania was born on 3 November 1890 in a scholarly family in Surat, Gujarat. Kania, who is keen on studies, did B.A from Samaldas College, Bhavnagar. and then completed his law studies from Government Law College, Bombay. During his studies, he had decided that he would make a name for himself in the field of justice.

In the year 1915, he started practicing law in Bombay High Court. Hard work, simplicity and deep understanding of law quickly earned him recognition. In 1930, he became acting judge in the Bombay High Court, in 1931 he was appointed additional judge and in 1933 he was appointed permanent judge. He was also the acting Chief Justice in 1944 and 1945. This period was proof of his experience and leadership.

When did you take the oath?

In 1946, Justice Kania was made the judge of the Federal Court of India. This Federal Court later became the foundation of the Supreme Court. The country became independent on 15 August 1947 and the Supreme Court came into existence on 26 January 1950. On the same day, Justice HJ Kania took oath as the first Chief Justice of India (CJI).

Also read – AHSEC HS Result 2026: Assam Board has released the 12th class result, know how you can check the results easily.

What was the salary?

According to reports, when the Supreme Court was formed in 1950, the salary of the first CJI was fixed at Rs 5,000 per month. At that time, this amount was considered very respectable, but it was also a symbol of simplicity compared to the dignity of the position. Justice Kania was known for his calm nature, simplicity and justice.

How long did your tenure last?
His tenure was from 26 January 1950 to 6 November 1951. He departed from this world while still holding his post. In this way, he not only became the first CJI of the country, but also the first CJI to die while in office. The traditions that Justice Kania started in the early years of the Supreme Court later became the identity of the Indian judicial system. A strong foundation of court functioning, discipline and respect for the Constitution was laid during his time.

Also read – Strict attitude in Bengal elections, know how educated IPS Ajay Pal Sharma is, then ‘encounter specialist’ comes into discussion

Education Loan Information:
Calculate Education Loan EMI

Political controversy has intensified regarding a statement by Rajasthan Chief Minister Bhajanlal Sharma. He is accused of addressing the Chief Justice of India (CJI) as ‘Chief Justice of the Government of India’, after which the opposition has reacted strongly calling it an attack on the independence of the judiciary.

Strong opposition from Congress
Congress leader Abhishek Manu Singhvi, reacting on social media platform He said the Constitution draws a clear ‘Lakshman Rekha’ between the judiciary and the executive, and blurring it weakens the foundation of democracy.

A sitting Chief Minister calling a Supreme Court judge ‘his govt’s judge’ is not a slip of tongue, it is a dangerous glimpse into mindset. The Constitution draws a clear Lakshman Rekha between judiciary and executive. Blur it, and you erode the very foundation of democracy.…

— Abhishek Singhvi (@DrAMSinghvi) April 27, 2026

Also read: ‘A farmer works only for 25 days’, has CM Bhajan Lal’s video been edited? the opposition surrounded
Also read: CM Bhajanlal Sharma is strict on the law and order of Rajasthan, told officials – carelessness will not be tolerated.

Reaction of other leaders
Congress leader Saral Patel also made sharp remarks on this issue. He wrote on

It seems that illiteracy is the primary qualification in the BJP to be crowned as the CM.

Rajasthan CM Bhajanlal Sharma is referring to the CJI as the ‘Chief Justice of the Government of India.’

Shameful! pic.twitter.com/Y7EB3NWh7u

— Saral Patel (@SaralPatel) April 25, 2026

what is the root of the dispute
The entire controversy is related to the statement of Chief Minister Bhajan Lal Sharma, in which he allegedly called the CJI the ‘Chief Justice of the Government of India’. The opposition has termed this comment as ‘shameful’ and termed it against the dignity of the judiciary.

The Supreme Court has canceled the controversial decision of the Allahabad High Court in a case related to the attempt to rape a minor girl. In this decision given on March 17, 2025, the High Court had said that dragging the victim under a culvert, holding her breast and breaking the string of pyjama would not be called attempt to rape. While canceling the decision, the Supreme Court has also stressed on the judges and people associated with the judicial system across the country to become more sensitive in the cases of sexual crimes. The court has also ordered the formation of an expert committee to give suggestions in this regard.

What was the decision of the High Court?

Regarding this incident with an 11 year old girl, High Court Justice Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra concluded that this is a case of attack on the dignity of a woman. This cannot be called rape or attempted rape. Justice Mishra had removed IPC sections 376 (rape), 18 (attempt to commit crime) and POCSO Act against the two accused in the case. He had asked to be prosecuted under Section 354-B (use of force for the purpose of disrobing a woman) and Section 9 (serious sexual assault) of the POCSO Act.

What happened in the Supreme Court?

Seeing the far-reaching impact of the High Court judge’s findings and his comments, social organizations had requested the Supreme Court to take cognizance. On the basis of this, the Supreme Court had started this hearing. At the very beginning of the hearing, the Supreme Court had stayed the disputed order of the High Court. Now it has been completely canceled. In such a situation, the accused in the case will now be tried for attempted rape.

Chief Justice wrote the decision

Chief Justice Surya Kant has written this order on behalf of the bench of 3 judges. It says that preparing a crime and attempting a crime are two different things. In this case, taking an 11 year old girl on a bike, dragging her from the road and taking her under a culvert and sexually abusing her cannot be called mere preparation for rape.

Guidelines will be made for the future

During the hearing of the case, many lawyers had requested the court to make guidelines for the future. Instead of doing so directly, the judges have handed over the case to an expert committee. The Supreme Court has requested Justice Aniruddha Bose, director of the National Judicial Academy (NJA), Bhopal, to form a committee under his chairmanship. Apart from him, there should be 4 members in it. These members should be legal experts, educationists and social workers.

What will the committee do?

The court has asked the committee to work on these things: –

• The expert committee should prepare guidelines to make judges and judicial process more sensitive in cases of sexual crimes.
• The committee should study those steps which have already been taken in this direction by the court or the government. It also remains to be seen what impact those measures had. Talk to people (judges/lawyers/social organizations) at the grassroots level and give suggestions for the future.
• These recommendations should serve as a guideline for judges and people associated with the judicial system. In this, they should also be told what to do in cases of sexual crimes or other similar crimes when the complainant, victim or witness is from a weaker section.
• Amidst the linguistic diversity in the country, there are many words which are objectionable. Such words, the use of which can fall in the category of crime, are still used in the society. The committee should prepare a list of such words. With this, while listening to the victim, the judge and the people of the judicial system will be able to understand his pain better.
• The Committee should also remember that the primary beneficiaries of its work are people who belong to the weaker sections of the society. Among these too, a large number are women and children. Therefore, the draft guidelines should be in such a language that even common people can easily understand. Heavy technical words of foreign language should not be used in this.

The Supreme Court has said that when the committee’s report is presented before it, it will hear further and give orders.

Regarding the case of bail rejection of former student leader Umar Khalid, the country’s former CJI DY Chandrachud said on Sunday (January 18) that it is the right of a citizen to get bail before conviction. Along with this, the former CJI asked to ensure transparency in the collegium system related to the appointment of judges in the High Court and the Supreme Court and to restore and strengthen the trust of the common citizen in the judiciary.

‘The matter of right to bail before conviction’
When the issue of bail of Umar Khalid was initially raised by senior journalist Veer Sanghvi in ​​the ‘Ideas of Justice’ session at the 19th Jaipur Literature Festival, Justice (Retd) Chandrachud said, “It is a matter of right to bail before conviction.” Our law is based on a presumption and that presumption is that any accused person is innocent until proven guilty.” Giving examples of several cases, Justice Chandrachud said that if there is a possibility of the accused returning to the society to commit the crime again, tampering with the evidence or taking advantage of bail to escape from the clutches of the law, then bail can be refused to the accused.

What did you say about national security?
He said that if these three grounds are not there then bail will have to be granted. I feel that where there is a national security issue, it is the duty of the court to investigate the matter in depth. Otherwise what is happening is that people remain in jail for years. Expressing concern over the delay in disposal of cases in the Indian criminal justice process, he said that the Constitution of the country is the supreme law and there is no concrete exception in the case and if there is a delay in speedy trial, the accused is entitled to bail.

What did the district courts say about not granting bail?
Justice Chandrachud described the non-grant of bail by the sessions and district courts as a matter of concern and said that distrust towards authority has increased and judges fear that their integrity will be questioned. He said that this is the reason why bail cases reach the Supreme Court. He described the decisions given by the Supreme Court regarding granting permanent commission to women in the armed forces, decriminalizing homosexuality and ‘electoral bonds’ as major transformative decisions of his tenure.

What was said on marital rape case
On the question of not taking up any post after retirement, Justice Chandrachud said that at present he is enjoying life as a citizen. When asked about his regrets regarding any case during his tenure, Justice Chandrachud said that it has been 76 years since the country got independence but even today marital rape has not been brought into the category of crime. He strongly advocated for change in the law for this. It was during his tenure that live telecast of Supreme Court proceedings was started not only in Hindi language but in all the Indian languages ​​listed in the Eighth Schedule of the Constitution.

read this also

Weather Forecast: When will it rain in UP? IMD’s update has arrived, cold will increase further in Delhi, Bihar, Punjab and Haryana from today.

Justice BR Gavai has now retired after assuming the post of Chief Justice of India (CJI). The new CJI Surya Kant has taken over. On this occasion, Justice Gavai spoke openly about his journey to the Supreme Court. He also responded openly to the speculations about joining politics after retirement. While being the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, Justice Gavai has been involved in more than 330 decisions.

After retirement, Justice Gavai gave an interview to India Today. When asked, you had said that you will not take a job after retirement, so are there chances that you can enter politics? On this he said that at the moment I have not thought about it. I’m just at peace right now. I have decided not to do anything right now and believe that you should live as per today.

‘I will not accept any governor’s post’
He said, ‘As far as I feel, I will not accept the post of head of any tribunal. I will not accept any governor’s post. I will not even accept being nominated in Rajya Sabha. I am very clear about this.

CJI Surya Kant heard 17 cases on the first day
On his first day as Chief Justice of India, Justice Surya Kant set a new procedural benchmark on Monday (November 24). He said that for immediate listing the cases should be mentioned in writing. Oral requests will be considered in exceptional circumstances, such as in cases involving the death penalty and personal liberty. The bench led by CJI Surya Kant heard 17 cases for about 2 hours on the very first day.

Let us tell you that earlier, former Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna had stopped the oral practice for immediate listing of cases in the apex court. However, Justice Gavai, who came to this post after Justice Khanna, started it again. Generally, sometimes lawyers mention the cases orally before the Chief Justice, so that they can be listed immediately.

read this also

The Indian girl who was detained by China for 18 hours, now her new post has surfaced, know what was said

Chief Justice of India (CJI) BR Gavai said that he follows Buddhism, but has not studied any religion in depth. Describing himself as completely secular, he said that he believes in all religions – Hindu, Sikh, Muslim, Christian.

Considered humanity and the Constitution above religion.
Speaking at a program, he told that he got this idea from his father, who was a follower of Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar. Gavai said that whenever the family got information about any Dargah, they used to go there also.

CJI said before leaving the Supreme Court
This speech was given at the farewell ceremony organized by the Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association (SCAORA). CJI Gavai is retiring on 23 November and 22 November is his last working day in the Supreme Court.

What I am today is because of the Constitution and Dr. Ambedkar – BR Gavai
CJI Gavai, who comes from the Dalit community, said that his entire journey was possible because of the Constitution and Dr. Ambedkar. He said, ‘Whatever I am today is because of this institution (Supreme Court). A child who studied sitting on the floor in a municipal school could never have imagined that he would reach this far. I always tried to follow the four values ​​of the Constitution – justice, liberty, equality and fraternity.

VIDEO | Delhi: Speaking at his farewell function, Chief Justice of India BR Gavai says, “I practice Buddhism, but I do not have any deep knowledge of any religious studies. I am truly a secular person. I believe in all religions, Hinduism, Buddhism, Sikhism, and Islam.”

(Full… pic.twitter.com/zqSo5qVuMX

— Press Trust of India (@PTI_News) November 20, 2025

Supreme Court is not just an institution of CJI but of all judges – Gavai
Gavai said that the Supreme Court should not be an individual-centric institution. He said that I never took decisions alone. Every decision was taken with the participation of the full court and all the judges. The Supreme Court is a big institution and judges, lawyers, registry and staff are all equally important in it.

Mention of big decision on calling lawyers by investigating agencies
In the program, SCAORA President Vipin Nair thanked CJI Gavai for taking cognizance of the issue of lawyers being summoned by the investigating agencies. In an important decision of October 31, the Supreme Court had said that agencies like ED cannot summon lawyers on the basis of their legal advice.

Incoming Chief Justice of India Surya Kant called on members of the legal fraternity to be sympathetic towards those seeking justice and emphasized that both the bar and the bench have equal responsibility in the administration of justice.

Bar is the first step to get justice: Justice Surya Kant
While addressing as the chief guest at the 125th Foundation Day function of Avadh Bar Association organized in the auditorium of the High Court located at Gomti Nagar, Justice Surya Kant said that the first step to get justice for the weak and poor people is the Bar. He said, ‘Whoever comes to the court in the hope of justice, he first approaches the lawyer. Therefore the Bar should understand the pain of the poor. The Bar and the Bench have equal responsibility in the administration of justice.

Challenges of justice system in the era of AI
Referring to the changing times and new technological challenges, Justice Surya Kant said, ‘The era of AI has arrived, the country is progressing economically. In such a situation, the number of commercial cases will increase, for which we will have to be prepared. He described India’s judicial system as one of the best judicial systems in the world. Recalling his days as a lawyer, he said that he had received invaluable guidance from the senior members of the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court. He described the relationship between the Bar and the Bench as an unbreakable one.

Role and responsibilities of lawyers
Chief Justice of Allahabad High Court Justice Arun Bhansali said, ‘White shirt, black coat and gown are not just a uniform, but a belief.’ He urged the lawyers to explain the legal proceedings in simple language so that the client can understand it easily. Delhi High Court Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyay said the legacy of the Awadh Bar has been glorious, having given the state two chief ministers, Shripat Mishra and C.P. Gave Gupta. He also said that a member of the Awadh Bar became the first Attorney General of Pakistan and his son later became the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Pakistan.

Providing justice is the priority of lawyers: Judge
Justice Rajan Rai, senior judge of the Lucknow bench, said that the members of the bar should listen to the voice of the poor section and providing justice in the legal profession should be their first priority. Justice Mahesh Chandra Tripathi said, ‘A strong bar is the hallmark of a strong judiciary.’ The program was organized by Awadh Bar Association President S. Chandra and general secretary L.K. Tiwari also addressed.

The country will get a new Chief Justice on 24 November. President Draupadi Murmu has approved the recommendation to appoint Justice Surya Kant, the second senior most judge of the Supreme Court, to this post. On October 27, the current Chief Justice BR Gavai had recommended the name of Justice Kant as his successor to the Central Government.

Chief Justice Gavai is retiring on 23 November. In such a situation, Justice Kant will take oath of office on 24th November. His tenure will be till February 9, 2027 i.e. about 15 months. He will be the first Chief Justice of the Supreme Court to come from Haryana.

Became Supreme Court judge in 2019

Justice Surya Kant was born on 10 February 1962 in Hisar, Haryana. Justice Surya Kant, coming from a middle-class family, became the Advocate General of Haryana in the year 2000. In 2004, he was appointed judge of Punjab and Haryana High Court. In 2018, he became the Chief Justice of Himachal Pradesh High Court and on 24 May 2019, he became the Judge of the Supreme Court.

liberal attitude in court

As a judge, Justice Surya Kant, who has more than two decades of experience, expresses his views vocally in the court. Along with this, he also gives full opportunity to all the lawyers to present their views. His attitude is particularly lenient towards the parties appearing in person in the court. He is often seen listening to their problems like a family member and suggesting solutions.

Notice not issued on insult to CJI

Recently, he showed generosity by refusing to issue a contempt notice to the lawyer who threw a shoe at Chief Justice BR Gavai. He said that the court does not want to give importance to that lawyer by taking further action against him.

Hearing of many big cases including Bihar SIR

He has heard many important cases in the Supreme Court. Even at this time, he is hearing many important cases including Bihar SIR (Voter List Revision), Shiv Sena election symbol dispute, expulsion of illegal infiltrators and digital arrest.

Also read:- Delhi Police opposed the bail of Delhi riots accused in the Supreme Court, said- ‘2020 riots in the country…’

Chief Justice of India (CJI) Bhushan R. Gavai has recommended the Central Government to appoint Justice Surya Kant as the next Chief Justice. Justice Surya Kant, the second most senior judge of the Supreme Court after the current CJI, can take charge as the 53rd CJI of the country on November 24.

CJI Gavai will retire on 23 November. According to sources, Justice Gavai, who took oath as the Chief Justice on May 14 this year, has recommended the name of Justice Surya Kant to the Union Law Ministry as the next Chief Justice. Justice Surya Kant’s tenure as CJI will be more than one year and two months. He will retire on 9 February 2027. Let us tell you that the retirement age of Supreme Court judges is 65 years.

CJI Gavai praised Justice Surya Kant
In his recommendation, CJI Gavai has described Justice Kant as suitable and capable to take charge in all aspects. He also said that both have similar social background, which is full of determination and struggle. Gavai said, “Like me, Justice Kant also comes from a section of the society that has seen struggle at every level of life, which makes me believe that he will be best suited to understand the pain and suffering of those who need the judiciary to protect their rights.”

Who is Justice Surya Kant
Born on 10 February 1962 in Hisar, Haryana, Justice Surya Kant’s rise to the highest position in the judiciary reflects his academic excellence and administrative skills. Justice Surya Kant, a Hisar graduate, obtained his law degree from Maharishi Dayanand University, Rohtak in 1984. He started his career from Hisar District Court before moving to Punjab and Haryana High Court in 1985.

He has expertise in constitutional, service and civil matters. ​​His legal understanding and balanced advocacy have given him the opportunity to represent many major public institutions, including universities, boards and banks. In the year 2000, at the age of just 38, he became the youngest Advocate General of Haryana. An achievement that made him one of the most prominent legal figures in the state. The next year he was given the status of senior advocate.

read this also

Cyclone Montha: Cyclonic storm Montha can wreak havoc, red alert in many states, know latest updates