India’s politics has become hot after US President Donald Trump’s decision to increase H1-B visa fees. The opposition is constantly questioning the Modi government. Asaduddin Owaisi, head of All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM), surrounded the central government after the US step to fix a fee of $ 1 lakh. He raised the question that “What did the country benefit from big programs like Howdi Modi and Namaste Trump?”

What did Owaisi say?

On the social media platform X, Owaisi wrote that Trump almost eliminated the H1-B visa system, while this visa benefited most of the Indians, especially the youth of Telangana and Andhra Pradesh.

Owaisi accuses Modi government

Owaisi alleged that the Modi government ignored long -term benefits for showing in domestic politics. He said that his complaint is not with Trump, but to the government. “What did we achieve with events like Howdi Modi and Namaste Trump?”

Hyderabad MP Owaisi lashed out at Prime Minister Modi and said that Trump’s decisions prove that America does not see India as a strategic partner. He also said that only the best wishes of birthday cannot be a proof of the success of foreign policy. Owaisi alleged that a change in H1-B visa was done especially to target Indians.

He also recently mentioned the tariff imposed on Indian goods and the security treaty of Pakistan-Saudi Arabia and said that all this was not possible without the approval of the Trump administration. According to Owaisi, these incidents seem weak in India’s global situation.

Owaisi said this big thing

Owaisi called the Modi government’s term ‘lost decade’ in India’s foreign policy. Other opposition parties also did not lag behind. The Congress described the Prime Minister as a weak leader and Arvind Kejriwal of the Aam Aadmi Party commented that the Modi government is looking completely helpless in this matter.

Also read-

Tilak, Raksha Sutra and Gaumutra … VHP’s decree before Navratri, rules made for entry in Garba program

The Congress has given a serious reaction to the statement of ‘election boycott’ given by Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) leader Tejashwi Yadav regarding Bihar assembly elections. The party said on Saturday that this warning of Tejashwi Yadav indicates that fair election conditions are not being created in the state.

The issue of boycott is still ‘premature’

Senior Congress leader and spokesperson Abhishek Manu Singhvi said that the issue of election boycott is still ‘pre -pre -‘, but if such a collective decision is taken, it will raise a big question on the credibility of the Election Commission.

He said, “This is an important question, which is still premature. Don’t see the statement, look at the spirit behind it … The feeling behind it is pain, pain, anger. That is that we are completely ready, but why the ground is unilateral, uneven, this is its message.”

Tejashwi accused about SIR

Significantly, Tejashwi Yadav recently warned that if the process of special intensive revision of the voter list is not withdrawn, the RJD can boycott the upcoming assembly elections if the process of special intensive revision of the list is not withdrawn. They allege that this process can become a means of removing the names of many new voters from the voter list or not to include them, which can cause damage to the opposition parties.

There is a possibility of holding assembly elections in Bihar between October-November this year. In such a situation, the increasing dispute over the voter list can increase the conflict between the opposition and the Election Commission.

The Congress made it clear that it is fully ready to contest the election, but it cannot compromise on the fairness of the democratic process. Singhvi indicated that if the opposition parties have to take a big decision together, then the Congress will also be ready for it.

Now it will be interesting to see whether the opposition parties unite and pressurize the Election Commission on this issue, and how the commission reacts to this warning.

West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has refused to react to the sudden resignation of Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar. Talking to reporters in Howrah, Mamta said, “I don’t have to comment about this. Let’s see what happens.” He further said, “They are a healthy person. I think his health is absolutely fine. Mamta Banerjee’s statement came at a time when the opposition parties are constantly raising questions about the resignation of the Vice President and considering it as related for political reasons.

Mamta erupted on reporter
Mamta Banerjee rained on a reporter during a conversation with the media. He said angrily to the reporter, you do not say what we do, you guys only talk about BJP? Do we dare to talk? On the question of Jagdeep Dhankhar’s resignation, Mamta said why are you decorating it? Do not ask the question of Dhankar ji’s resignation so much. He is a healthy person.

Jagdeep Dhankhar resigned to President
Jagdeep Dhankhar sent his resignation to President Draupadi Murmu on Monday evening. In his resignation sent to Murmu, Dhankar said that he is leaving the post with immediate effect for “giving priority to health care”. Dhankhar said in a letter to the President, “According to Article 67 (A) of the Constitution, I am resigning from the post of Vice President of India with immediate effect.

Jagdeep was in the news due to the vocal attitude
Jagdeep Dhankhar made headlines due to his vocal attitude and controversies, but he was most discussed when he was the Governor of West Bengal. There was a demand to remove him several times regarding his behavior in that period, which is long before the impeachment motion brought by the opposition in the Rajya Sabha in December last year.

Trinamool Congress demanded removal in 2020
In December 2020, five MPs of the Trinamool Congress (TMC) submitted a memorandum to the then President Ram Nath Kovind, demanding the removal of Governor Jagdeep Dhankhar from the post. The MPs accused him of working on the orders of “political masters sitting in Delhi” and running a special political agenda targeting the state government.

Udit raj on operation sindoor: After the recent military confrontation between India and Pakistan and ‘Operation Sindoor’, the Government of India is now preparing to put its stand firm in front of the global community. In this connection, a delegation of MPs of various political parties will visit major countries of the world. Its purpose is to create an international public opinion about Pakistan -sponsored terrorism and justify India’s response on the global platform.

However, on this initiative, there is a mixed response in political circles. Congress leader Udit Raj has raised a sharp question on this plan of the government. He said that when no one is supporting India in the world, what will be achieved by sending 40 MPs abroad? He argues that India may have targeted some terrorist bases during Operation Sindoor, but the roots of terrorism are spread deep in Pakistan. According to him, everything effectively controls ISI in Pakistan and the statements of Prime Minister Shahbaz Sharif have no significant importance.

#Watch Delhi | “The USA is with Pakistan. Many Other Countries are also supporting Pakistan. I don’t know how true this is, but the atomic power that Pakistan has aaerica’s’ much pic.twitter.com/gev8V9ckzg

– ANI (@ani) May 17, 2025

Congress stance and political background

However, the Congress party is supporting this effort. Congress General Secretary Jairam Ramesh said that Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju has talked to party president Mallikarjun Kharge regarding this delegation. Ramesh also said that even though Prime Minister Narendra Modi has refused to call a special session in Parliament or preside over the all-party meeting, the Congress has always stood in favor of national interest.

He also clarified that the Congress will be a part of this multi -party delegation as it is a serious topic like preparing national security and global public opinion. The Congress party also wants the resolution passed by Parliament on 22 February 1994, in which Pakistan -occupied Kashmir was described as an integral part of India, it should be repeated again. This proposal was unanimously passed and it remains the basis of India’s Pakistan policy.

Why need international diplomacy

The ruthless killing of 26 people in the terrorist attack in Pahalgam on 22 April had shocked the entire country. In response, India destroyed many terrorist bases in Pakistan and POJK under Operation Sindoor. However, after this military retaliation, there was no expected support from the international community, which raised questions on India’s foreign policy.

In such a situation, the Government of India’s effort that it creates international public opinion through MPs, is considered a part of a new and aggressive diplomatic strategy. After neutral or vague reactions from America, Türkiye, China and Gulf countries, it has become necessary that India should keep its position clearly and effectively.

Will this strategy be effective?

The question is also whether this strategy will prove to be really effective? To influence the global public opinion, only a political delegation will be enough or at the same time India will have to take further diplomatic and economic steps? Many experts believe that India will have to present concrete evidence of their military actions, which will lead to its credibility and strengthening on the international stage. Also, it is equally important to refute the fake nectar being spread by Pakistan on technical and documentary basis.