A shocking case has come to light from China, where a court in Southern China sentenced a woman to imprisonment. The woman is accused of accidentally killing her daughter while performing an exorcism ritual.

According to a report by South China Morning Post, the court of Shenzhen in Guangdong province in July sentenced a woman named Li to 3 years in prison, which was later suspended for 4 years. The woman’s elder daughter was also sentenced. The court had given this decision in July on the charge of murder by negligence.

Prosecutors said Lee and her two daughters were influenced by superstitious beliefs about hauntings. They believed that demons were attacking them and that their souls had been sold. In December last year, his younger daughter suddenly said that she was possessed by a demon and appealed to her mother and sister to perform an exorcism.

what is the matter
During the exorcism ritual, both of them put pressure on the girl’s chest and poured water down her throat to induce vomiting. The victim’s daughter found some benefit from this and asked her family members to continue doing it. The next morning other family members saw blood flowing from his mouth and called the police. Doctors declared him dead on the spot.

What did the court say in its decision
The court ruled that the mother and sister had no intention of killing and thought they were helping, yet their actions resulted in their daughter’s death, which amounts to negligence.

Various reactions were seen on social media in China regarding this matter. People demanded better science education and increased public awareness to combat superstitions. One person said that cult followers are generally stubborn. Instead of accepting the reality, they believe that the demon was very powerful.

read this also

Rain, snowfall and fog… cold increased the trouble, meteorological department issued warning, know how the weather of Delhi-UP will be.

Pakistan court has extended the interim bail of Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi. The court has extended the interim bail till January 27. The court on Tuesday heard the May 9 violence case of PTI founder Imran Khan and his wife Bushra Bibi. During this, orders were given to increase the interim bail in other cases including violence. Also, Imran has been instructed to participate in the next hearing personally through visual hearing.

Instructions to Imran to appear in the hearing on January 27

According to Pakistani newspaper Dawn, this order has been given by the bench of Additional District and Sessions Judge Muhammad Afzal Majoka. He heard the bail petitions before the arrest. Advocate Shamsa Kayani appeared on behalf of Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi. Due to the absence of the former Prime Minister, the debate on the petitions was not taken forward. The court has extended the interim bail and fixed the hearing date as January 27. Besides, the court has also ordered to ensure the presence of Imran Khan in the next hearing.

Apart from cases related to the violence on May 9, several other cases including attempt to murder, alleged submission of fake receipts have been registered against Imran Khan. Apart from this, a separate case has been registered against Bushra Bibi for submitting fake receipts related to Toshakhana gifts. In a related development, the next hearing in the case of the already filed arrest petition has been fixed for January 27.

Lawyer not given permission to meet Imran

PTI lawyer Khalid Yousuf Chaudhary has not been allowed to meet Imran Khan. The lawyer in the court had said that he could get her signature on the power of attorney documents required to file an appeal against the recent conviction in the Toshakhana case.

Here, citing rights, the party alleged that jail officials are preventing Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi from meeting their lawyer in Adiala jail to sign the power of attorney. The party has said that making the PTI founder’s lawyer wait for hours, closing the legal desk and not providing the facility to execute the power of attorney was a deliberate attempt to prevent access to justice.

The party said- signing and filing appeal is a legal right

PTI said that under Punjab Prison Rules 1978, 178 and 179, every prisoner has the legal right to meet his lawyer, sign legal documents and file appeals. Jail authorities have no right to obstruct this process. The party further alleged that denial of the right of appeal is a violation of Articles 10-A, 4, 9 and 25 of the Constitution.

While giving its verdict on Thursday (December 11) in the case of Ram Gopal Mishra murder that took place during the Durga idol immersion yatra in Bahraich on October 13, 2024, the court sentenced the main accused Sarfaraz alias Rinku to death. The other nine accused Abdul Hameed, Faheem, Talib alias Sablu, Saif Ali, Javed Khan, Jishan alias Raja, Shoaib Khan, Nankau and Maroof Ali were given life imprisonment. All the accused were presented in the court from the district jail. The court also mentioned Manusmriti in its decision.

According to the court’s decision, the prosecution made it clear that the murder was not the result of an ordinary dispute, but was a heinous incident of extreme cruelty and well-planned. The government lawyer said that this murder is an extreme example of ‘brutality’ and ‘humanity’. He told that 7 to 8 rounds were fired on the deceased Ram Gopal Mishra, about 40 entry wounds and 2 exit wounds were found on the body. Apart from this, the toes of both the feet were given deep burns and the nails were pulled out, which further increases the brutality of the murder.

The penal system is absolutely necessary for the welfare of the people – Manusmriti

Citing Manusmriti, the court said, “Dand Shasti Prajah Sarva Dand Evabhirakshati, Dand Supteshu Jagarti, Dand Dharma Vidurvadha.” That is, the penal system is absolutely necessary for the welfare of the society and the people. It is said in Manu Smriti that people do not deviate from their religion and duty due to fear of punishment and it is a means of maintaining security and order in the society. From this point of view, giving appropriate punishment to criminals is considered necessary in the interest of justice and society.

Criminals should be given strict punishment – Government lawyer

The prosecution also said that the purpose of the murder was to establish social and religious dominance. After this incident, panic spread in the entire city. Schools were closed, internet remained down for three days and RAF and PAC had to be deployed to maintain security. It took a month for normalcy to return to the city. The government lawyer said that this incident is like an ‘attack on Maa Bharati’ and the criminals should be given harsh punishment so that a message is sent to the society that no crime against the law will be tolerated.

This murder was completely planned- Court

The defense argued that this is the first offense of the accused and they have no criminal history, hence they should be considered for lesser punishment and fine. The court carefully listened to the arguments of the prosecution and defense and reviewed its record. The court said that this murder was completely planned. The culprits dragged Ramgopal Mishra out of his house and Sarfaraz fired at him with a licensed gun. The upper body of the deceased was in such a serious condition that it was described as like a sieve. The court called it a heinous, cruel and cold-blooded murder.

The court clarified that death penalty is given only in ‘rarest of rare’ cases, in which it is necessary to balance the nature of the crime and the circumstances of the criminals. In its decision, the court cited the decisions of previous historical cases like Bachan Singh and Macchi Singh.

Also read- IAS officers transferred in Bihar, three new departments created in Nitish government got secretaries.

Gita swears in court: We all have often seen in films that in the court room, the judge makes a witness swear on Geeta before taking his statement. Have you ever wondered why witnesses are made to swear on Geeta only and not on Ramayana? Let us know the reason behind this?

According to the information available on the internet, when there was the era of Mughal rulers in India, it was they who started the practice of taking oath by placing hands on religious books. In fact, during that period, the Mughal rulers used to lie for their own benefit, due to which they did not believe the words of Indian citizens.

Keeping this in mind, he started the practice of making the citizens of India take oath by placing their hands on their religious scripture.

The British gave the form of law to the Darbapi system

Till the Mughal rule, the practice of taking oath by placing one’s hand on the Gita was a court custom, at that time there was no law for it, but the British legalized this practice and implemented it in all the courts with the passing of the ‘Indian Oaths Act, 1873’.

Under this Act, people of Hindu sect used to take oath by placing their hands on Geeta and people of Muslim sect used to take oath by placing their hands on Quran. Whereas Christians were made to take oath on the Bible. However, by the time independent India arrived in 1957, this practice was continuing in some royal courts of the country, such as the Bombay High Court.

Oaths Act came into force in 1969

In Indian courts, the practice of swearing by placing one’s hand on a religious text was abolished in 1969. When the Law Commission submitted its 28th report and suggested some changes in the Indian ‘Oath Act, 1873’ in the country.

In its place, the Oaths Act 1969 came into force, thus a uniform oath law was implemented in the country.

Why only Geeta for oath in court?

Have you ever wondered why oath is taken in court by placing one’s hand on Gita, whereas the epic Ramayana is a more popular religious book. The reason behind this is that the life of Lord Shri Ram is mentioned in Ramayana. By reading the book of Ramayana, people get guidance for an ideal life.

But Geeta is such an epic which provides an ideal life to the people. It not only mentions the Mahabharata war, but also describes the kind of conduct a man should conduct to establish truth.

Disclaimer: The information provided here is based only on assumptions and information. It is important to mention here that ABPLive.com Does not constitute any endorsement or verification of information. Before implementing any information or belief, consult the concerned expert.

Maintenance Allowance Rules: There have been many discussions in the country regarding maintenance allowance. Some people get maintenance allowance in lakhs. So some for just thousands and some for just a nominal amount. These days the issue of alimony is again in discussion. Because Indian cricketer Mohammed Shami’s ex-wife Hasin Jahan gets Rs 4 lakh as alimony every month. Now he has demanded to increase this amount.

Haseen Jahan says that considering the current expenses and inflation, this amount is not enough for her. After this step of his, the question has again arisen that what is the maximum amount that a wife can ask for as alimony from her husband and how does the court decide this amount. Let us tell you complete information about this.

How much maintenance allowance can I get?

According to Indian law, many aspects are taken into consideration to decide the amount of alimony. This includes the husband’s income, the wife’s needs, her lifestyle and the duration of married life i.e. how many years the marriage lasted. Generally, the court can fix 25 to 33 percent of the husband’s total monthly income as alimony.

Also read: Party invitation may empty your bank account, scammers are cheating like this by sending wedding cards.

Although this is not a fixed rule. If the wife does not have her own income or the children live with her. So the amount may increase further. Whereas if the wife is already working or has decent property. So in this regard the maintenance allowance can also be reduced. That is, there is no limit on what the maximum alimony can be.

How is the scale of alimony decided?

Alimony is decided on a case-by-case basis. The court gives its decision in all cases based on the circumstances. In this, it is seen how much is the husband’s income, what are the wife’s needs, and whether she has any means of her own or not. In some cases, the court asks the husband to provide proof of his income such as salary slip, bank statement and tax return.

Also read: In which mutual fund one should invest money, know what are flexi and multi cap funds?

Along with this, needs like wife’s expenses and children’s education are also taken into consideration. In Haseen Jahan’s case also, the court will decide the amount on the same basis. If it is proved that there has been a huge increase in Shami’s income. So the claim for increasing the alimony may be stronger. If the court does not agree with Hasin Jahan’s views and does not find it necessary, then the allowance will not increase.

Also read: If the car has traveled 1.20 lakh km then which parts are very important to be replaced? know the important thing

If you are confused about your career after 12th and you feel that your words have power, you like fighting for justice and want to do something for the society, then advocacy i.e. law can be a great career option for you. Many youth dream of becoming a lawyer in the Supreme Court after studying law. This is the largest court of the country, where the most serious, constitutional and historical cases of the country are fought. But you cannot directly become a lawyer in the Supreme Court. The path to becoming a Supreme Court lawyer is long, so let us know where and how one has to study to become a Supreme Court lawyer.

Where do you have to study to become a lawyer in the Supreme Court?

Becoming a Supreme Court lawyer starts from your 12th class. If you want to make a career in advocacy, then you must have passed 12th class from any stream with at least 45 percent marks. After this you have two options. In which the first 5 years law course can be done. This course is for those students who want to make a career in law directly after 12th. In this, you are taught both graduation and law simultaneously in 5 years. For this course you have to appear for entrance exams like CLAT or LSAT India. Apart from this, after graduation you can do 3 years LLB course. If you have already done graduation and now want to study law, then you can do 3 years LLB course. To take admission in this course, you also have to appear in the college entrance examination.

How to study to become a lawyer in Supreme Court?

To become a lawyer in the Supreme Court, after studying law, you have to appear for an important examination. Which is AIBE, this examination is conducted by the Bar Council of India to ensure whether a new lawyer is eligible to practice in the court or not, whereas if you want to become a lawyer in the Supreme Court, then it is necessary to work in the District Court and High Court first. Apart from this, to practice independently in the Supreme Court, you have to pass the Advocate on Record (AOR) examination.

Only after passing this examination, you can file a case in your name in the Supreme Court. There are some conditions for this, such as there should be at least 5 years of court experience, 1 year of training with an AOR lawyer and after passing the examination, your office should be within 10 miles of the Supreme Court. Once you complete this process, you get recognized as an AOR lawyer in the Supreme Court. After this you can fight the case independently in the Supreme Court.

Also read: MP Police Constable Exam Admit Card Released! Know how you can download

Education Loan Information:
Calculate Education Loan EMI

Many years ago, India was ruled by the great emperor Akbar. His court was considered the center of knowledge and thoughts. Akbar wanted people not to tie the old rules only, but should adopt new thinking and education. Scholar Mulla Abdul Qadir Badauni was also in his court. He wrote in his book Tawarikh that Akbar left some Islamic rules and accepted some things of the heretics. Mulla Badauni made many serious allegations against Akbar, some of which cannot be mentioned publicly.

Akbar made this plan in 1582

In 1582, Akbar planned to run a new religion. He held meetings with the intelligent people of his court. In a meeting, King Bhagwandas Kachhwaha asked him that if Hindu and Muslim religion are bad, then what will be his new religion. Akbar thought and stopped persuading the king to the new religion, but continued to work on his thoughts.

Meanwhile, some opponents were sent to southern states. He explained to the rulers there that Akbar has punished them, so that they get shelter in their states with respect. Akbar appointed Qazi Abdul Samee in Delhi and implemented new rules.

Darbari started changing names to please Haram’s women

Mulla Badauni wrote that some courtiers started changing their names to please the women of Haram. He changed the name to names like Mohammad, Yaar Mohammad. Seeing these steps, Akbar tried to change education and thinking in the society.

Akbar called Syed Mir Fateh Ulla and tasked him to teach the children of the rich. Children were taught new ways of calculations, letters and knowledge. Syed Mir Fateh Ulla gave modern education to the children and introduced them to new thinking.

Mulla Badauni protested

Mulla Badauni protested, but it was clear that Akbar’s purpose was to expand knowledge and education in the society. Their efforts gave the children a new thinking and created a new atmosphere of ideas in the court.

Also read-

Donald Trump can give exemption to these Indians in H-1B visa, you will not have to give 1 million dollars

There has been a big disclosure in the murder case of Charlie Kirk, the founder of Charlie Kirk, founder of the Conservative of the USA, which took place in the US in the past. According to the documents filed in the court, the accused Tyler Robinson confessed to the crime in the text message sent to his transgender partner after executing the incident.

Last week, while giving a speech at Utah Valley University, 31 -year -old Kirk shot a rifle in his neck and died. The next day of the incident, the police arrested the accused Robinson. A case of murder was registered against the accused during the first appearance in the court.

The accused confessed his crime
The accused has confessed why he killed Kirk. According to him, he was fed up with the hatred of Charlie Kirk. The chat message revealed in the court filing shows that Robinson had planned the murder about a week ago. He said in a message to his partner that I was fed up with his hatred. Some hatred cannot be eliminated by dialogue.

What did Robinson say in a message sent to his partner
He also told that he used his grandfather’s rifle and hid the weapon after firing. During the police investigation, bullet kiosks, practice targets and one hand note have also been recovered from the accused’s house. Robinson tells his partner that I am worried about what my father would say if I did not take back the gun of Dada. I do not know whether he had a serial number or not. I am afraid of fingerprint, so he had to leave in a bush.

Then Robinson tells his partner that since Trump became President, my father has become a surety Maga (Make America Great Again) supporter. I will surrender myself. I have a neighbor Sheriff Deputy. I am just worried about you, love. The partner says that I am worrying too much to you. Then Robinson says do not talk to the media. Do not give any interview and do not give any statement.

Also read

‘India is not afraid of anyone’s nuclear threats’, PM Modi’s message on his birthday

Utility photo gallery

Donald Trump’s tariff may have caused panic worldwide, but America is making a big profit. Revenue from the US tariff rose to $ 31 billion in August, which is the largest record in 2025 so far in a month.

According to the latest data released by the Treasury Department on Thursday (September 4, 2025), the total tariff revenue for 2025 has exceeded $ 183 billion. The tariff revenue report from Friday to Sunday has not been released yet.

‘America will be ruined without tariff revenue’
Donald Trump says that America will be ruined without tariff revenue. Tariff Revenue increased from $ 17.4 billion in April to $ 23.9 billion in May, then reached $ 28 billion in June and $ 29 billion in July. According to this, America can get as much tariff revenue in only 4 to 5 months as it had received during the last year.

What did the US court say
In 2025, the financial year tariff revenue was $ 86.5 billion as compared to this time. This increase in revenue matches the federal appeal of the court, stating that President Donald Trump has encroached his right by using emergency powers to put a wide global tariff. At the same time, Trump described the unexpected benefits from the tariff as ‘very beautiful to see’, because it is increasing cash in America.

The court said in one of its decisions that the right to impose such tariffs is completely with the Congress or the existing trade policy structure. This decision will not be applicable to the tariffs imposed by other legal authorities, such as steel and aluminum imports on behalf of Trump. Attorney General Palm Bandi announced that the Department of Justice will appeal to the Supreme Court against this decision. Meanwhile, the court has allowed Tariff to remain in force till 14 October.

Also read

‘Decision will be taken with weapons, Putin gave a big warning as soon as he returned to Russia from China