social on the media strange the one in discussion about clothes actress Happiness MukherjeeShe also remains in the headlines due to her statements. Just a few days ago, he gave such a statement in the media, due to which They Now she is stuck in legal trouble. in the past days actress Indian cricketer Suryakumar Gave a controversial statement regarding Yadav. Now on the actress regarding this defamation It has been claimed.

In fact, during a media interaction recently, Khushi Mukherjee had said that Indian T-20 captain Suryakumar Yadav messages her on social media. This statement of Khushi had made a lot of headlines on social media. Now according to a report in Times of India, Faizan Ansari, a fan of Suryakumar Yadav, has filed an FIR against the actress. In which he has filed a defamation claim of Rs 100 crore against the actress. This complaint has been registered in Ghazipur Police Station.

Fan made serious claims
Faizan says happiness Mukherjee all this only fame Doing to get. Khushi’s statement is hurtful, it will harm the image of Surya Kumar Yadav. Faizan also says that he made this statement without any evidence chats Have shown. This clearly shows that this is just a baseless allegation which player Is damaging the image of.

what did khushi say?
actually happiness Mukherjee Had said in his statement- ‘i can play any cricketer date Do not want to do Many cricketers are after me. Suryakumar Yadav me a lot earlier message We used to, but now we don’t talk much. I don’t want any kind of connection. something related to my name lick-up I don’t like.’ This statement of Khushi had gained a lot of attention even at that time and people appreciated him a lot. troll Also did.

The defamation case of IRS officer Sameer Wankhede was heard in the Delhi High Court on 8 October today. Sameer Wankhede filed a defamation petition against Shah Rukh Khan and Gauri Khan’s company Red Chillies Entertainment, the makers and others of the series ‘The Bads of Bollywood’, on which hearing.

Notice issued to Netflix and Red Chillies

While hearing the case, the Delhi High Court has issued notice to both Netflix and Red Chillies. Sameer Wankhede has been accused of defamation after scenes shown in the ‘The Bads of Bollywood’ web series. Notice has been issued to Netflix and Red Chillies Entertainment to file an answer on Wankhede’s petition. The next hearing will be held at the end of this month.

Sameer Wankhede’s lawyer said that today Delhi High Court filed a defamation petition filed by IRS officer Sameer Wankhede by Red Chillies Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. (Whose owner has been issued summons to Shahrukh Khan). The web series produced by Red Chillies Entertainment is related to the defamatory and malicious content broadcast in it, which has caused serious damage to the reputation, dignity and public image of IRS officer Sameer Wankhede and his family.

Let us know that The Bads of Bollywood has been made by Shah Rukh Khan’s son Aryan Khan. He has made his direction debut with this series.

Reacting to the defamation case made on Shah Rukh Khan and Gauri Khan’s company Red Chillies Entertainment, IRS officer Sameer Wankhede said only Satyamev Jayate.

Significantly, in 2025, Red Chillies Entertainment (Shah Rukh and Gauri Khan’s company) made a web series The Bads of Bollywood. In this, the character of Sameer Wankhede was allegedly shown negative. Wankhede has filed a civil defense suit in the Delhi High Court, calling it a defamatory, false and malicious and malicious and malicious.

Foreign lawsuit in India: Recently, Bridge Macron, wife of French President Emmanuel Macron, has filed a defamation case in an American court. He has filed this case against Candes Owens. Candes are a right -wing American podcaster. Owens alleged that Bridge is transgender and was born as a man. But later he changed his gender. With this, bridge scientists and photography will present the evidence to prove their gender. After this high profile case, another legal question arises as to whether a foreign national can file a similar case in India.

Allegations against Bridge Macron

Claims regarding Bridge’s gender are the basis of defamation case. Bridge says that all of them are false and they are considered defamation. Bridge is the mother of three children from her first marriage and has been facing these things since Emmanuel was elected President in 2017.

Defamation suit in India

Let us tell you that defamation in India is a criminal and civil crime under Section 356 of the Indian Justice Code. Under certain conditions, foreign nationals can also record cases in India. The conditions in this are something like that in any way that the material has been defined, it should be in India or should be printed in India, so that the value of any person in the country is damaged. If the defamable material reaches India or the dignity of a man in India is damaged, then the Indian courts generally have the right to control.

With this, if a foreign national gives evidence of defamation loss, then he can demand compensation for loss in the Indian Civil Court. Along with this, evidence like publication, social media posts or digital materials present in India can further strengthen its claim.

How it is different from American case

In the US, Bridge has filed a case in the court with regular rights as it is allegedly defamation there. Similarly, in India, foreign nationals will have to provide evidence that that person has suffered losses in India due to defamation. The process here may be a bit complicated because the Indian court will need a written statement, verification of identity and evidence of publishing and circulation in India.

Also read: Did the cats really live in Ballimaran? Know how its name was

The Delhi High Court has issued a notice to former Delhi Chief Minister Atishi and Sanjay Singh on a defamation petition filed by Congress leader Sandeep Dixit.

In the Delhi High Court, a bench of Justice Ravindra Dudeja has directed the AAP leaders to file a reply by December 4 on the plea of Sandeep Dixit, filed against the order of the Rousse Avnu Court.

Rouus Avonu Court’s decision was challenged in High Court

The revision petition against Sandeep Dixit’s decision has been filed in the Delhi High Court. In this petition, their complaint against AAP leaders was dismissed by the Rousse Avenue Court. The court dismissed the petition, saying that the alleged defamation factors were given during the election, the allegations were part of the transplant.

Sandeep Dixit’s lawyer made serious allegations

The lawyer appearing on behalf of Sandeep Dixit in the Delhi High Court said that the way the allegations made by the AAP leaders appear to be personally. And this false allegation somewhere caused their client’s reputation and their electoral loss. This case is equal to defamation.

Relief was not provided from Rouse Avnu Court

In fact, the Rousse Avnu Court rejected Sandeep Dixit’s petition on 3 April. In the application filed in the Rousse Avnu Court, Sandeep Dixit had said that AAP leaders Atishi and Sanjay Singh held a press conference on 26 December 2024 alleging that Sandeep Dixit had taken crores of rupees from BJP.

‘Allegations are baseless’

In this press conference, it was alleged that in association with BJP, he is involved in plotting to defeat AAP. It was said in the petition that whatever Atishi Marlena and Sanjay Singh said in the press conference are lies and baseless.

The Supreme Court on Tuesday (July 22, 2025) said that the court’s time should not be wasted in such cases. This case is related to Tharoor’s 2018 statement in which he gave a controversial statement about Prime Minister Narendra Modi. This comment was given by the bench of the Supreme Court, headed by Justice B.R. Was doing Gawai.

What did the court say?

According to the report of India Today, the bench was hearing the petition of Tharoor in which he has demanded the cancellation of the defamation proceedings against him in the Delhi court. When the case was discussed in the court on the case filed by BJP leader Rajiv Babbar, Babbar’s lawyer said that he has filed his reply, but the bench was not affected by it.

The court said, “You pay attention to more important matters. Why do you entice the court in such things?” The bench also clarified that it will hear the case of Shashi Tharoor next week. Along with this, another defamation case filed against Aam Aadmi Party leader Arvind Kejriwal and Atishi will also be heard.

When Rajiv Babbar’s lawyer demanded a separate list of both cases, the court strictly said, “Don’t tell us what to hear and how to order.”

What was the matter?

In fact, in November 2018, Shashi Tharoor made a controversial statement about PM Modi in a program. On that comment, BJP leader Rajiv Babbar had filed a defamation case alleging hurting religious sentiments and damaging the Prime Minister’s image.

What did the Supreme Court say before?

In October 2023, the Supreme Court issued a notice on the petition of Tharoor challenging the Delhi High Court’s decision, refusing to cancel the case. At that time the court had said, “Many times a metaphor narrates the truth in less words. Just as a picture speaks more than a thousand words, there is also a metaphor. I do not know why people are hurt by it.” Since then, the Supreme Court had stayed the proceedings of the trial court, which brought Shashi Tharoor relief from the appearance. Now the Supreme Court will hear this case next week.

Also read-

‘Apologize to husband and wife and print in the newspaper’, the order of SC to IPS wife, strictly said- if you used their power …

Rahul gandhi defamation case: Congress MP and Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi surrendered in the MP-MLA court in Lucknow on Tuesday. The surrender was done under a defamation case filed in connection with the alleged defamatory remarks allegedly made on the Indian Army. Soon after the surrender in the court, Rahul Gandhi’s lawyer filed a bail petition, which was approved by the court and he was granted bail.

Controversial statement was given during India’s journey
The whole matter is on 16 December 2022, when Rahul Gandhi, while referring to the clash of the Galwan Valley in a conversation with the media during the Bharat Jodo Yatra, said that, “Chinese soldiers are killing our soldiers, but the media does not question them.” This statement was described as abusive to the army.

Army official answer
The Indian Army had issued a statement on 12 December to make it clear that the Chinese Army had attempted to infiltrate the Indian border, which the Indian Army responded strongly. After this, the Chinese soldiers returned and both sides suffered minor injuries in the clash.

Retired officer filed a complaint

Retired director of Border Roads Organization (BRO) Uday Shankar Srivastava filed a complaint against Rahul Gandhi in the court regarding this statement given on the army. It has been said in the complaint that Rahul Gandhi has deliberately made false and defamable statements with the aim of tarnishing the image of the Indian Army.

The court summoned Rahul as accused

The MP-MLA court of Lucknow summoned Rahul Gandhi as an accused in the case. On Tuesday, he surrendered before the court and got bail. Now the date of the next hearing of this case will be determined by the court, in which the arguments of the parties will be heard.

Prashant Kishor News: A defamation case has been filed against Prashant Kishore on behalf of Minister Ashok Chaudhary. It has now received the response of Prashant Kishore, the founder of Jan Suraj. Talking to reporters on Tuesday (June 03, 2025), Prashant Kishore said that we have not born anyone who scared defamation, lawsuit and FIR.

PK said to reporters, “Whose name you are taking name (Ashok Chaudhary), make defamation as many times as you want, go and FIR. Prashant Kishore looks afraid of someone? We are a sand mafia? We are doing liquor business? We are in a government post? Have been campaigning in Bihar for three years on the injury of the dancing and see that there is no one who has come in front of you, which is not a wanted Bihar. After four gunmen roam around, in the name of security, we have been walking in the same Bihar for three years and we have not cut a single dog. “

‘Nobody can say that we have done anything wrong’

Prashant said that this government had lifted us in darkness to arrest us from Gandhi Maidan. The people of 20 police stations went to arrest us together. Took it to court. What happened? On the same day, he left for fear. No one can stand in Bihar and say that Prashant Kishore has taken even one rupee from anyone. Nobody can say that we have done something wrong, no one can say that we are going and abusing anyone.

PK further said, “We said that the job is being sold from BPSC. They also said that they will sue the defamation.

Journalists questioned that you are standing on your point that Ashok Chaudhary’s daughter was given a ticket by paying money? On this, PK said that there is public discussion about this in Bihar. There is no need to say this to Prashant Kishore.

Also read- CM Nitish’s minister increased PK tension! Case filed against Prashant Kishore, know the case