The election bugle has sounded in Bihar. Regarding this, the Election Commission has also strengthened its preparations. Whenever elections come, the one name you hear the most is Micro Observer. But do you know who they are and who appoints them? Let us tell you today…

From Lok Sabha to Assembly and Panchayat elections, lakhs of officers and employees perform their duties at every stage. The supervisor plays an important role in these. Micro observers are usually central or state government officials. The Election Commission appoints them specially.

Only those government employees who are working on Group-C or above posts are selected for these posts. The Election Commission sends these officers to the polling stations so that they can keep a close eye on the entire process and ensure that the elections are conducted in a completely fair and transparent manner.

What is work?

Micro observers are deployed at polling stations to ensure that the voting process is completely fair, free and peaceful.

• Are EVMs being sealed properly at the polling station?
• Is every voter being identified correctly?
• Is electoral ink being applied on the hands of voters?

Also read – In which states will schools remain closed on Valmiki Jayanti on 7th October? See the complete list at a glance

How much honorarium will you get?

According to reports, micro observers are given an honorarium of Rs 2,000 for their work per day of duty. Along with this, they also get separate travel allowance i.e. traveling expenses. If an officer is sent to a distant polling station, then his food and accommodation arrangements are also made by the administration. The entire process of voting usually takes one to two days.

Also read- Who is Kranti Gaur, who defeated Pakistan? Know their education

Education Loan Information:
Calculate Education Loan EMI

The hearing of the case related to the Special Register of Indian (SIR) has started in Bihar in the Supreme Court. During this time, senior Congress lawyer Kapil Sibal said that it is very important to decide whether Aadhaar can be recognized as evidence of citizenship or not. He said that some steps being taken by the Election Commission are not in line with the orders of the Supreme Court and it should be given immediate attention.

During the hearing, the judge asked Sibal, “We are unable to understand why you put so much emphasis on the basis of every hearing? Are you considering it as evidence of citizenship?” Kapil Sibal clarified, “We are not saying so, but the court order said that Aadhaar should also be recognized. Taking a decision on this basis should be part of the judicial process.” Kapil Sibal said in front of the court that it is necessary to decide whether the Aadhaar is valid or not. He also questioned the Election Commission and said that the action that the Commission is taking is wrong and the orders of the Supreme Court are not being followed.

During the hearing, the judge asked this question

During the hearing, the judge asked, “We are unable to understand why you are giving so much emphasis on the basis of every hearing? Are you considering it a proof of citizenship?” On this, Sibal clarified that his aim is not to present Aadhaar as a proof of citizenship. He said, “We are not saying so. But the court had earlier ordered that Aadhaar should also be accepted.”

Kapil Sibal gave this argument

Kapil Sibal further said that BLO (BOTH Level Officer) is not accepting this, while he has received its oral order. He told the court that it is necessary to give clear instructions in this case. He further said that the Election Commission has issued a ‘show cause’ notice to those officers who did not accept Aadhaar. He said that the court needs to give clear guidelines so that the order of the Supreme Court can be ensured.

Notice of notice

The judge asked to see the notice. Sibal read it and narrated it. After this, Election Commission lawyer Rakesh Dwivedi explained the situation to the court. He said that the order of the Supreme Court has been widely publicized and people are also uploading copies of Aadhaar online, but clarified that the Commission cannot consider Aadhaar as evidence of citizenship. The judge questioned the topic of the notice that no other documents other than 11 documents could be accepted for citizenship. Dwivedi said that he has to see this, because he does not have the notice of another party.

“Aadhaar will be considered a proof of identity”

The judge clarified that in addition to passport and birth certificate, no other documents of 11 documents can be considered as evidence of citizenship. Sibal proposed that Aadhaar should be declared as 12th document. The judge said, “Aadhaar is not a proof of citizenship, but under the Representation of the Public Representation Act, it can be recognized as evidence of identity.”

Also read-

‘Full arrangement of food, treatment and security …’, India told Belgium Court where and how will Mehul Choksi be?