There is an alert in Ayodhya, Mathura and Varanasi of UP on the anniversary of the demolition of Babri Masjid. Strict security arrangements have been made in all the three districts. As a precautionary measure, checking campaigns are being conducted at various places by the police team. Let us tell you that exactly 33 years ago, on 6 December 1992, Kar Sevaks had demolished the Babri Masjid. Since then, on 6th December, police remains on alert in Ayodhya, Mathura and Varanasi.

There is alert in Varanasi on the anniversary of Babri Masjid demolition. DCP Crime, Saravanan Thugamani said, “Everyone from Varanasi Commissionerate to the entire zone is on high alert. Investigations are being conducted at Varanasi City, Varanasi Junction and Banaras railway stations and patrolling teams have been deployed at all 84 ghats.

Increased security near Kashi Vishwanath temple and other temples

Apart from this, special monitoring will be done at Assi Ghat, Namo Ghat and Dashashwamedh Ghat during the evening aarti. Along with RPF and GRP, bomb disposal squad and dog squad are investigating in the parking lot of the railway station. Investigations are also being done at bus stands. Special security has been deployed at Kashi Vishwanath Temple, Kaal Bhairav ​​Temple and Sankatmochan Hanuman Temple…”

Police force is fully prepared in Mathura

At the same time, special security arrangements have been made in Mathura on the anniversary of the demolition of Babri Masjid. In this regard, SP Crime Avneesh Mishra said, “Those without identity cards and unauthorized entry are being continuously checked. The police force is on full alert.

He said that like previous years, adequate forces have been deployed. Continuous investigation is being done. All the information received is being verified. Traffic is still going on. School children are going to school. This is completely normal. Right now, there is no traffic diversion.”

Police increased surveillance in Ayodhya

On the other hand, police is on alert in view of security in Ayodhya. Regarding security preparations, SP Chakrapani Tripathi said, “There are arrangements for checking at various points… We have requested all the hotels and dharamshalas to maintain records of the guests staying there, which our officers will check. Vehicles are being checked regularly. Our teams are also patrolling the ghats and other areas. There are separate teams for security checking and monitoring as well as crowd management.”

KK Muhammad, former regional director of Archaeological Survey of India, has appealed for restraint on the temple-mosque controversy. Also, there has been talk from his side of keeping three religious places in the discussion. These include Ram Janmabhoomi, Mathura and Gyanvapi.

‘These places should be handed over to Muslims’
KK Muhammad has suggested to Muslims that these places should be handed over to Hindus. Apart from this, one should avoid making claims now, otherwise these problems will never end. This statement of the former regional director has come at a time when many petitions are pending in the courts of the country regarding claims on different religious places.

Speaking to India Today, Muhammad said that Ram Janmabhoomi, Mathura and Gyanvapi are as important for Hindus as Mecca and Medina are for Muslims.

What did you say on Ayodhya dispute?
The former officer told that he was involved in the excavation of Babri Masjid under the leadership of Bibi Lal in 1976. The controversy also grew due to a Muslim communist historian, who convinced the official to refuse to accept the evidence of a temple beneath the mosque.

He said that at that time the Muslim community was in favor of resolving the issue regarding permission to build the temple. He also claimed that the historian was not an archaeologist, he was not even present during any kind of excavation. He spread a lot of false things in this regard.

Claim on Taj Mahal rejected
The former officer has rejected the claims of Taj Mahal and said that it is a complete lie. Muhammad told that this was the palace of Raja Man Singh, after which it was transferred to Jai Singh and then to Shahjahan. Its supporting documents are preserved in Bikaner and Jaipur museums. However, he has said that the demands from the government regarding cultural heritage have not been fulfilled. This is a dark phase of the Archaeological Survey of India.

However, ASI Director General Yadubir Rawat has rejected his claim and said that ASI is doing a lot of work. We have enough budget. We also have thousands of monuments to manage. It is not understandable that some people have raised issues after retirement. But why did he not raise it when he was in service? ASI does not support any political party. The job of the organizations is to find out and collect documents. They have to do the documents.

The leaders of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) have welcomed the statement of Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind chief Maulana Mahmood Madni in which they supported the conversation on the Gyanvapi and Mathura Masjid disputes. BJP leader Shahnawaz Hussain said that Madni’s statement has come late, but ‘late came, come, come late’. He said that Kashi, Mathura and Gyanvapi should be discussed openly.

Shahnawaz Hussain mentioned the statement of the RSS chief

According to news agency ANI, Shahnawaz Hussain reminded that RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat has already said that there will be no movement on Kashi and Mathura, but a solution should be found. Earlier, BJP leader Ajay Alok said that the controversy would be good for the whole country, while RP Singh supported the dialogue, calling Mathura and Kashi the cultural heritage of India. At the same time, Nalin Kohli praised Madni’s statement in which he said that foreign intruders should not live in India.

RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat has already made it clear that the Sangh had only officially supported the Ram temple movement, although Sangh workers can personally raise voice for Kashi and Mathura movements.

Congress raised questions

Congress leader Rajesh Thakur has objected to Madni’s statement. He said, “This matter belongs to the court and administration, not of the RSS. Do not understand why Maulana gave this statement and under what pressure.”

What did Maulana Mahmud Madani say?

Talking to news agency ANI, Maulana Mahmood Madni said, “Our organization had already passed the proposal that there should be dialogue. There are differences, but they have to be reduced. The way the RSS chief extended the hand of dialogue should be appreciated. We will support all efforts.”

Also read-

Sema Haider: Seema Hyder, who came out of Noida for the first time, know where and whom did she get?