Karnataka High Court has advocated for strict punishment like the Middle East. The court said that people are increasingly taking advantage of the rights and freedoms provided under the democratic system. Justice R Nataraj made this comment while rejecting the bail plea of ​​a 23-year-old youth accused of rape.

The judge said that under the existing laws, criminals are not being dealt with strictly, due to which the deterrent effect of punishment has become weak.

Because of democracy people take law lightly: HC

According to the Bar & Bench report, the court said, ‘The law has lost its strength because we do not deal strictly with the criminals. That is why unlike the Middle East, it has become so easy to commit crimes. If you cut off hands or feet, then perhaps people will understand to follow the law because we have democracy here, so everyone takes it lightly.

Also read- DMK and AIADMK were going to form the government together, Tamil Nadu CM Vijay made a big revelation, told about the planning.

The accused is a 23 year old student

The High Court issued a notice to the state government on the bail plea of ​​the 23-year-old youth and postponed the next hearing of the case till June 8. Advocate Ayantika Mandal, appearing for the accused, argued that her client has been in judicial custody for about two months and no crime has been committed.

The accused’s classmate made the allegation

A 23-year-old student at Manipal Institute of Technology has been accused by one of his classmates of sexually assaulting him against his will. According to the complaint, both were in a relationship for some time, but later the woman distanced herself from him after doubting his character.

Also read- There was an uproar over the song Vande Mataram, now Shashi Tharoor’s reaction came, said- ‘I think this…’

Allahabad High Court has banned the merger of schools in Sitapur, Uttar Pradesh. While hearing the matter, Chief Justice ARun Bhansali and Jaspreet Singh have approved the special appeal for the next date to the petitioner of Sitapur to the petitioner of Sitapur.

Let us tell you that the petitioner was disappointed in the hearing held here in the bench of a single judge. Recently, two petitions were rejected against the merger decision, after which a special appeal was filed. A special appeal was placed before the two judges on behalf of the petitioner.

Ban on the merger of schools in the district till further orders
Chief Justices Arun Bhansali and Jaspreet Singh have ordered the petitioner of Sitapur to maintain the relief school as soon as possible. The next date of this special appeal has been approved for August 21. That is, the schools of Sitapur will not be merged till the next hearing.

This order will be applicable for Sitapur’s school only
Please tell that there was an appeal for the children of Sitapur, so after the hearing, the order of the school which is the case will be applicable for the same school. The court has given a stay after hearing Sitapur’s petition. The court said that the school will not be merged till the advance order from now on. The government has to file the counter, after that the children of the children will put their answers. The next hearing will be held on August 21.

What did the petitioner’s advocate say?
In the case of merger of primary schools, the stay of the High Court will be applicable only to Sitapur district. Dr LP Mishra, the petitioner’s lawyer, says that the entire episode was from Sitapur, so the stay has been done only for Sitapur.