Rajya Sabha MP Harish Biran sought information regarding vacant posts in High Courts across the country. It was asked what are the existing vacant posts of judges in the High Courts, the details of the recommendations of the Supreme Court Collegium pending before the government and the reasons for their pending. Apart from this, has the government evaluated the impact of vacancies on pending cases in the country? If yes, what are its details? And what are the steps taken by the government to fill these vacancies in various courts?

Answer given by the government

1. Responding to this, Minister of State (Independent Charge) of the Ministry of Law and Justice and Minister of State in the Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs, Arjun Ram Meghwal said that against the sanctioned posts of 1122 judges till 27 November 2025, 825 judges are working and the posts of 297 judges are vacant in various High Courts.
2. Against these vacancies, 97 proposals for appointment of High Court judges are at various stages between the government and the Supreme Court Collegium. Recommendations for 200 vacancies have not yet been received from the High Court Collegium.
3. Giving information, the Minister said that the responsibility of initiating proposals for appointment of judges in the Supreme Court rests with the Chief Justice of India, whereas the responsibility for initiating proposals for appointment of judges in the High Courts rests with the Chief Justice of the High Court.
4. As per MOP, High Courts have to make recommendations at least 06 months before the vacancy. However, this time limit is rarely observed. For appointments to High Courts, the opinion of the concerned State Government is obtained as per MOP. The recommendations are also to be considered in the light of other reports available for discussion. The recommendations of the High Court Collegium, State Governments and the Government of India are then sent to the Supreme Court Collegium (SCC) for advice.
5. The appointment of judges to high courts is a continuous, integrated and collaborative process that requires consultation and approval between the executive and the judiciary. It requires consultation and approval from various constitutional authorities at the state and central levels. Only those persons are appointed as judges of the High Courts whose names have been recommended by the SCC. From May 2014 to 01.12.2025, 1156 judges have been appointed in various High Courts.
6. Pendency of cases in the Court arises due to several factors, including complexity of facts, nature of evidence, cooperation of stakeholders, such as the Bar, investigating agencies, witnesses and litigants, as well as physical infrastructure, supporting court staff and proper application of rules and procedures to track and bunch hearing of cases. Moreover, the pendency of cases in the High Courts and the vacancy position of judges are not necessarily directly related.

Courts not only deliver verdicts, but also create confidence in the minds of people about justice. An ordinary citizen goes to the court because he has faith that the judge will look at his case without any bias or prejudice and he will get justice. India’s justice system rests on this trust. Therefore, sometimes judges recuse themselves from hearing a particular case, so that the message is not sent that there may be any personal bias in the decision.

In the last few years, it happened many times that some judges of the Supreme Court or High Court recused themselves from a case. Sometimes reasons are given, sometimes not, but the question arises that how can a judge recuse himself from a case and what difference does it make to his career?

How can a judge recuse himself from a case?

This is called Recusal in English i.e. withdrawing oneself from the hearing of a case. The main reason for this is conflict of interest. Meaning, any relationship, background or association that people feel could influence the judge’s decision. As if the judge is from the same state where the case is related to. There may be a past acquaintance or professional relationship with any party, the judge may have previously been an advocate in the same case, the judge may have shares or interests in any organization related to that case.

Does the judge have to give reasons?
There is no fixed rule that the judge has to be told why he is stepping aside. Sometimes the judge himself gives the reason, sometimes he silently withdraws without giving any reason, it completely depends on the judge. However, there are some ethical guidelines. For example, if a judge has shares in a company, he cannot hear cases of the same company. Apart from this, if the judge has previously been a lawyer in a case, then he should withdraw from that case.

What happens to the case if the judge withdraws?

The case is given to another judge or a new bench. Who to give is decided by the Chief Justice in the High Court and the CJI in the Supreme Court. Sometimes a judge is changed and sometimes the entire bench is changed. Whereas the judge recusing from the case is a normal process. This is considered sensible and moral. Many times this step increases the credibility of the judiciary. It is clear from this that for the purpose of justice, a judge’s withdrawal from a particular hearing or case does not affect his career in any way.

Read also Apart from triple talaq, how many types of divorce are there, what is the difference between them?

Education Loan Information:
Calculate Education Loan EMI

A High Court of Pakistan on Tuesday (November 18) ordered the police to stop harassing an Indian Sikh woman. Sarabjit Kaur, 48, was among the 2,000 Sikh pilgrims who crossed into Pakistan from India via the Wagah border earlier this month to celebrate Guru Nanak Jayanti. All the other pilgrims returned home to India on 13 November, but Kaur was found missing.

A senior police officer in Lahore later said that Kaur married Nasir Hussain of Sheikhpura district, about 50 kilometers from Lahore, a day after reaching Pakistan on November 4. On the same day, when the pilgrims went to Nankana Sahib, Kaur left everyone and reached Sheikhpura with Hussain.

Police accused of pressurizing to break marriage

Kaur and Hussain filed a petition in the Lahore High Court on Tuesday complaining that the police illegally raided their house in Farooqabad, Sheikhupura and pressurized them to end their marriage. Lahore High Court Justice Farooq Haider ordered the police to stop harassing the petitioners.

Sarabjit Kaur’s new name is Noor

In the petition, Kaur (who has now become Noor) said that a police officer is harassing her and forcing her to break the marriage. She said her husband is a citizen of Pakistan and has approached the Indian Mission to extend his visa and obtain Pakistani citizenship.

‘Got to Pakistan to marry Hussain’

According to a video viral on social media, Sarabjit Kaur has known Hussain through Facebook for the last 9 years. She said, “I am a divorcee and wanted to marry Hussain, so I have come to Pakistan for this purpose.” She further said that she and her husband are being harassed by the police and unknown people.

read this also

Who is Jawad Siddiqui, how did the founder of Al Falah University come on the radar of ED? know everything

If you are confused about your career after 12th and you feel that your words have power, you like fighting for justice and want to do something for the society, then advocacy i.e. law can be a great career option for you. Many youth dream of becoming a lawyer in the Supreme Court after studying law. This is the largest court of the country, where the most serious, constitutional and historical cases of the country are fought. But you cannot directly become a lawyer in the Supreme Court. The path to becoming a Supreme Court lawyer is long, so let us know where and how one has to study to become a Supreme Court lawyer.

Where do you have to study to become a lawyer in the Supreme Court?

Becoming a Supreme Court lawyer starts from your 12th class. If you want to make a career in advocacy, then you must have passed 12th class from any stream with at least 45 percent marks. After this you have two options. In which the first 5 years law course can be done. This course is for those students who want to make a career in law directly after 12th. In this, you are taught both graduation and law simultaneously in 5 years. For this course you have to appear for entrance exams like CLAT or LSAT India. Apart from this, after graduation you can do 3 years LLB course. If you have already done graduation and now want to study law, then you can do 3 years LLB course. To take admission in this course, you also have to appear in the college entrance examination.

How to study to become a lawyer in Supreme Court?

To become a lawyer in the Supreme Court, after studying law, you have to appear for an important examination. Which is AIBE, this examination is conducted by the Bar Council of India to ensure whether a new lawyer is eligible to practice in the court or not, whereas if you want to become a lawyer in the Supreme Court, then it is necessary to work in the District Court and High Court first. Apart from this, to practice independently in the Supreme Court, you have to pass the Advocate on Record (AOR) examination.

Only after passing this examination, you can file a case in your name in the Supreme Court. There are some conditions for this, such as there should be at least 5 years of court experience, 1 year of training with an AOR lawyer and after passing the examination, your office should be within 10 miles of the Supreme Court. Once you complete this process, you get recognized as an AOR lawyer in the Supreme Court. After this you can fight the case independently in the Supreme Court.

Also read: MP Police Constable Exam Admit Card Released! Know how you can download

Education Loan Information:
Calculate Education Loan EMI

The Karnataka High Court on Thursday (September 25, 2025) refused to stay the social and educational survey prevalent in the name of a caste -based survey. Instructing the state government to maintain the confidentiality of the data, the court also said that the survey should be voluntary. A division bench of Chief Justice Vibhu Bakhru and Justice CM Joshi said that they do not see any reason to stop the survey.

What did the bench say?
The bench said, ‘We make it clear that the data collected will not be disclosed to anyone. The Karnataka State Backward Classes Commission (KSCBC) will ensure that the figures are completely safe and confidential. The judges also directed KSCBC to issue public notification that the survey is voluntary and no one can be forced to give any information. The court said that those who calculate this thing will also have to tell the public.

Opposition to ethnic census
Significantly, the caste census being done by the Karnataka government is being opposed and it is being alleged that it can be taken political advantage. Earlier this week, the state government defended the survey and said that the central government is adopting a double attitude in this matter. The survey, which started from 22 September, will run till October 7. Due to the problems of server and network, employees had a problem with the first two days.

Abhishek Manu Singhvi gave this argument
Senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for the state, argued that the Center had amended the 105th constitution in 2021, under which the states got the right to identify and list the backward classes. Singhvi said in the court that now the Center is now supporting the petitioners because there is a government of the opposition party in the state.

Social Media Platform X (First Twitter) The Karnataka High Court has suffered a shock. Central government Techdown Order Challenging X The court dismissed the petition on Wednesday (24 September 2025). Court two Dumb Where Social Media Platforms To work in India, one has to follow the laws here.

The company reached the company on Techdown order of X

The central government had instructed X to block some accounts and posts in the past, but the Elon Musk Company had challenged the Karnataka High Court. On behalf of X, it was said in the court that he works under American laws and has the right to freedom of expression. He said that for this reason there is no need to follow the Techdown orders of the Government of India.

In response to this, it was said by the government that Article 19(2) Only guarantees freedom of expression for Indian citizens and not foreign companies or non-citizens. It was said by the center that Social Media Platform Will have to follow the laws and rules of the country.

‘Can not be allowed to work without control’

Karnataka High Court said that in today’s time Social Media Regulation Need and companies cannot be allowed to work without control. A bench of Justice M. Nagprasanna gave the verdict, saying, “Information and communication have never been left without regulation. As the technology has progressed, control and regulations have also come into force.”

The court said, “Any citizen who wants judicial protection should be a citizen of the nation. The cooperation portal is a symbol of cooperation between citizens and intermediate, so there is no justification for this challenge. Social The media cannot be left in chaotic independence. every Sovereign Nation Social Controls media. Any platform to the Indian market Just Can’t operate as a playground. “

The Delhi High Court gave a verdict which caught the attention of the people. The matter was related to a quarrel between neighbors. In which FIRs were lodged from both sides. The quarrel actually started with the pet and gradually reached the scuffle and abuse and threatening. But later the two families reached a compromise and filed a petition in the Delhi High Court and appealed to cancel the FIR lodged in the case.

In the Delhi High Court, Justice Arun Moga while hearing the case said that when the dispute is resolved by mutual consent and this is a private matter, there is no need to continue criminal action. But instead of finishing this, the court added a unique condition to it.

Both neighbors distributed Pizza and Amul’s buttermilk – High Court

During the hearing of the case, the Delhi High Court ordered that pizza and Amul buttermilk will be distributed to all children and staff in the Government Children’s Home Sanskar Ashram built near GTB Hospital by both neighbors.

The Delhi High Court has ordered the pizza to be made by the complainant as he runs a pizza business. The Delhi High Court made it clear that every child careful and staff should be given a mixed veg pizza and tetra pack of Amul buttermilk.

The court canceled the FIR to protect both sides from unnecessary troubles and promote mutual goodwill and social harmony.

Investigating officer will monitor the case – High Court

During the hearing of the case, the Delhi High Court has given the responsibility of monitoring this order to the investigating officer so that the pizza party can be really. This decision of the court not only ended the quarrel of neighbors, but also gave delicious gifts to the children.

The Supreme Court has expressed displeasure over the inability to complete the work of some High Court judges and has spoken about performance evidence. The court said that if a judge is hearing a criminal case in a day, he cannot expect to decide in 50 cases, but if a judge says that he will hear only one bail plea in a day, then he needs to assess.

According to PTI reports, the bench of Justice Suryakant and Justice N. Kotishwar Singh was hearing the petitions that were filed by some convicts found for life imprisonment and death penalty. He alleged that the Jharkhand High Court has not pronounced the decision on his criminal appeals, despite keeping the faasy safe for years. However, the High Court later ruled in his case and acquitted many convicts.

The Supreme Court said that it does not want to work like a school prince for high courts, but should have a self-mausing system to ensure that he does not have piles of files on the table. The court said, ‘There are also judges who work day and night and are disposing of the cases brilliantly, but there are some judges who are unfortunately unable to complete the work. Whatever the reason, good or bad, we do not know and maybe there may be some situations.

The Supreme Court said, ‘Suppose a judge is hearing a criminal appeal, so we do not expect him to decide on 50 cases in a day. Deciding on a criminal appeal in a day is a huge achievement in itself, but in the case of bail, if a judge says that I will decide only on a bail plea in a day, then it is a matter for which there is a need to do self -evaluation.

The Supreme Court said, ‘Our intention is not to act like a school principal and there should be extensive guidelines, so that the judges know what they have and how much they have to do. There is a legitimate hope of the general public from the judiciary.

Advocate Fauzia Shakeel, who appeared in the case, presented a chart on the position of the decisions given by various High Courts and emphasized that some High Courts have not provided data in the prescribed format. The bench asked him to file the high court figures within two weeks, where the cases were reserved. Also, directed to upload the date of announcement of decisions and the date of uploading them. Senior Advocate Ajit Sinha was asked to assist in the matter.

Justice Suryakant said that some high courts have a habit of unnecessarily postponed cases. He also said that it can be dangerous for the image of the judges, as has happened with some judges in the past.

Telangana High Court has canceled the ranking list of Group-1 examinations of Telangana Public Service Commission (TGPSC). This list was released on 10 March 2025. The court has clearly stated that the examination papers will have to be re-examined. Until the investigation is completed, the new result will not be released. If the investigation is not possible again, then the exam will have to be done again.

A division bench headed by Justice Namwarpu Rajeshwar Rao gave the verdict after a detailed hearing on 7 July 2025. The court has given TGPSC eight months to complete this investigation. Thousands of candidates appearing for Group-1 examination will be affected by this decision, who had been waiting for the result for a long time.

What is the whole matter?

Telangana Public Service Commission (TGPSC) released the result of Group-1 examinations on 10 March 2025. This examination is for the state government jobs, in which recruitment is done for many big posts. However, after the result, many candidates questioned its investigation process. He said that there has been a disturbance in the investigation of the papers and there are many mistakes in the result. The candidates also said that there was a lack of transparency in the entire process. Some candidates filed a petition in the High Court regarding these complaints.

The petition said that TGPSC did not investigate the papers properly. Candidates also gave some evidence to the court, in which claims of disturbances in evaluation were made. The court heard these petitions seriously. In the hearing held on July 7, the bench of Justice Rajeshwar Rao heard the arguments of all the parties and took stock of the evidence. After this, the court ruled to cancel the ranking list.

What did the court say?

The court clearly stated in its judgment that TGPSC will have to re-examine Group-1 exam papers. This investigation should be completely transparent and fair. The court has given TGPSC eight months for this. In such a situation, TGPSC will have to complete this process by March 2026. If for some reason the investigation is not done again, the court has also said that TGPSC will have to conduct a fresh examination. This decision of the court is a big relief for those candidates who were not happy with the result. However, those people who had passed the results had passed before. Now they will have to wait for new results.

What will be the effect on the candidates?

Thousands of candidates appeared in Group-1 examination. These are those young people who are dreaming of government jobs. This decision will directly affect those candidates who passed. If the result changes in the re -investigation, then their ranking can also change. At the same time, this decision is a ray of hope for those who complained of disturbances. (Input: Sheikh Mohsin)

Also read: How educated are Nepal’s protesters Gen-Z leader Balen Shah? See the full education chart

Education loan information:
Calculate Education Loan Emi

The High Court stayed the orders of the single bench to cancel the sub -inspector recruitment of 2021 in Rajasthan. On Monday (September 8), hearing was held in the Rajasthan High Court in the famous case of cancellation of recruitment. The High Court ruled on the appeal of the selected policemen. The danger is hovering over the job of selected policemen due to this decision. The single bench decided to cancel the recruitment on 28 August 2025.

• The division bench of the High Court issued notice to others including the state government and asked them to file a reply
• In today’s hearing, arguments were presented by the selected policemen.
• Mainly advocate Tanveer Ahmed presented arguments
• Failed candidates also kept side
• The Division Bench of the High Court will now hear the matter on October 8
• Justice SP Sharma and Justice Sanjeet Purohit heard the case in the division bench
• After the decision, the selected candidates celebrated happiness
• The selected policemen expressed their gratitude to the court
• On the other hand, the failed candidate looked disappointed
• The selected policemen believe that the final decision will also come in their favor

859 posts were canceled

The single bench of the High Court ordered the recruitment to 859 posts to be canceled on the basis of paper leaks and disturbances. The decision of the division bench has brought great relief to the selected policemen.

Rajasthan government was also made party

An appeal was filed in the Division Bench of the High Court against the decision of the single bench on behalf of the selected candidates. In the appeal, the decision of the single bench was canceled and the correctly selected candidates were kept in the job. In the appeal of selected candidates, the Rajasthan government was also made party.

Sarva Samaj had staged a picket

On Sunday (7 September), there was a sit -in outside the District Collector Office for about four hours on behalf of Sarva Samaj. In this whole matter, the government demanded that they advocate in the High Court double bench and keep the side, so that those who are qualified candidates cannot be injustice to them.