Wi vs aus test: In the first Test played in Barbados, Australia cricket team defeated West Indies by 159 runs. Batting first, Australia was piled up at 180, West Indies were also able to score 190 runs. He took a lead of 10 runs, but Australia scored 310 runs and gave the target of 301 runs. The West Indies was all out for 141 runs. Many decisions of the umpire should be disputed in the match, which mostly went against the host. Angered by this, coach Darren Sammy had questioned the decisions by taking the name of the umpire.

West Indies vs Australia were third umpire Adrian Holdstock in the first Test, 5 of his decisions were disputed and 4 of them went against the West Indies. Coach Darren Sammy objected to the decisions of the third umpire by taking the name in the press conference. After this, the ICC sentenced him.

What did Darren Sammy say

Sammy, in the press conference, took the name of the umpire and said that due to such wrong decisions, the match went against us. He said is there anything against this team? When you see such wrong decisions one after the other, then the questions will arise. Apart from him, captain Roston Chase also raised questions.

ICC imposed a fine

The ICC added demerit points to Darren Sammy as a fine of 15 percent of the match fee. West Indies fast bowler Jeden Seals also imposed a 15 percent fine of match fees. He made some gestures after dismissing Pat Cummins, due to which he was punished.

West Indies captain Roston Chase also objected to the decisions of the umpire, saying that the players get punishment for wrong but nothing happens to the umpire. Actually a decision also went against Chase. On the second day of the Test, Pat Cummins lbw out LBW, but he took DRS on it. Ultra Age showed that when the ball was near the bat, there is some spike, but the third umpire gave him out.

Many decisions of third umpire should be disputed

Many decisions of not one but third umpire were disputed in this test. On the first day, the ball went to wicket keeper Shai Hope with the edge of Trevis Head’s bat, when this catch was investigated, the third umpire gave it out. In the first innings of the West Indies, Alex Carrie caught Shai Hope with one hand. The umpire asked the third umpire to investigate the catch, he called it out while the replay was seen that a part of the ball touched the ground while taking the catch.

Ind vs eng 1st test: India’s wicketkeeper batsman Rishabh Pant scored a century in both innings of the first Test being played in the headingley. Despite the great batting, the vice -captain has been reprimanded by the ICC. Pant violated Level 1 of the ICC Code of Conduct on the third day of the Test. The ICC has also punished him.

The ICC said in its statement that, Rishabh Pant has violated the Article 2.8 rules of the ICC Code of Conduct made by players and assistant personnel. It is related to disagreeing on the umpire’s decision during the international match.

Rishabh Pant gets this punishment

This was Pant’s first crime in 24 months, so a demerit marks has been added to his disciplinary records. Let us tell you that for the violation of Level 1, the minimum penalty is official reprimand, 50 percent of the match fee of the player and one or two demerit marks. But only 1 demerit marks have been added to Pant.

What did Rishabh Pant do?

In England’s first innings, when Ben Stokes and Harry Brook were batting, vice -captain Rishabh Pant was standing with the umpire to change the ball. It is a matter of the 61st over, then the umpire refused to replace it after examining the ball, while Pant wanted the umpire to check and change it once again. After being refused by the umpire, Rishabh Pant threw the ball loudly on the ground, many of its videos also went viral on social media.

India centurion reprimanded for actions during day 3 of the first #ENGVIND Test.https://t.co/cd90Zqda9f

– ICC (@ICC) June 24, 2025