These days a video is going viral on social media which has shocked everyone. The video looks no less than a film scene. Well-known poet and Congress Rajya Sabha MP Imran Pratapgarhi suddenly loses balance while landing from the helicopter and falls on the helipad due to a strong gust of wind. According to eyewitnesses, as soon as a strong gust of wind arose before the helicopter’s fans were switched off, Imran Pratapgarhi’s scarf and clothes started fluttering in the air. He tried to control himself but within a few seconds he fell on the ground.

Did Imran Pratapgarhi stumble due to helicopter wind?

It is clearly visible in the video that Imran Pratapgarhi was preparing to shake hands with the security personnel and local leaders present with him while getting down from the helicopter. Then a strong gust of wind comes from the blades of the helicopter and they stagger. Reportedly, the next moment he falls on the edge of the helipad and people present nearby immediately rush to pick him up. However, ABP does not confirm the video live. The news has been written only on the basis of the video going viral on social media. However, it is being claimed in the video that while getting down from the helicopter, Imran Pratapgarhi staggered and fell.

in web assembly #ImranPratapgarhi fell,
The drowning poet who talked about hitting the storm and the storm fell from the air #BiharPolitics #BiharElections @ShayarImran pic.twitter.com/OfqwtG1ioR

— MUHAMMAD AZEEM (@MuddAzeem) November 3, 2025

Also read: Video: Death drags us like this! Man’s life saved by one second, you will be shocked to see the video

Users immediately enjoyed

Social media users are giving different types of reactions to this video. Expressing concern, some people wrote, “Has anything happened to Saheb?”, while many users took it in a light tone and made funny comments. One user wrote… “A lion is a lion, just the wind is a little stronger!” Another user wrote… The poet who talked about the storm could not control himself due to a gust of wind. Another user wrote… The wind of the helicopter was also in the mood for poetry today.

Also read: This is the condition of the EV car worth Rs 15 lakh… When the road was closed, it was pulled by e-rickshaw; video viral

The Supreme Court has stayed the provision of the Waqf Amendment Act, 2025, under which a person was required to be a follower of Islam for five years for Waqf. Apart from this, the apex court said that the number of non-Muslims in the Waqf Board has also been limited to three. On this interim decision of the Supreme Court, Congress MP Imran Pratapgarhhi said that the Supreme Court has banned the soul of Waqf law.

Talking to ABP News, Imran Pratapgarhi said, ‘I see it as a big win. In the intention of the government, there were some amendments in it, which would have been banned by the Supreme Court on them. What the government had said that the condition of being a Muslim for Waqf, the entire frame to bring this law, the Supreme Court has stopped the soul of this law.

The fight is big, will fight till further: Imran Pratapgarhi

The Congress MPs, who were also the petitioners in this case, said that the rights given to the collector through this amendment were the biggest medium to rob the lands of Waqf. The Supreme Court has also commented on it. The fight is big, we will fight it further. Today is not the last interim decision.

What did the Supreme Court say in the verdict?

The Supreme Court, while giving the order, said that there is a dispute about some sections of the Waqf law. There is no basis for staying the entire law. However, the court has ordered the three major provisions. The court clarified that the condition of being a Muslim for 5 years to waqf will be postponed at present. Collector Waqf cannot settle the land dispute, the tribunal will settle it. The number of non -Muslim members in the Waqf Board cannot exceed three.

Also read- ‘It is not necessary to follow Islam for 5 years to Waqf’, Supreme Court’s big decision

A special dinner was organized by Maulana Mahmud Madni, President of Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind Maulana Mahmood Madni at Delhi’s Shangri-La Hotel on Wednesday night (July 23, 2025). Many MPs from opposition parties attended this dinner. Facials like Congress leaders Imran Pratapgarhhi, Imran Masood, SP MPs Singh Patel and Zia ur Rehman Burke were present in it.

Concern was expressed about the current situation in the meeting. There was a serious discussion on increasing violence and hatred against the Muslim community. Maulana Madani said that this is the time to unite and strengthen the voice of Muslim society.

These issues were discussed in the meeting
1. Bulldozer action issue in Assam
2. Hate Speech and Hate Crime to be held in the country
3. SIR process in Bihar
4. Caste Census
5. Palestine issue

What happened in this meeting:

On the action of bulldozers in Assam:
There was a demand to set up a Parliamentary Committee and this committee should visit Assam and arrange for the homeless people and arranged for their rehabilitation there.

On SIR process happening in Bihar:
In the meeting, all the MPs promised that this issue should be raised strongly in the Parliament and outside it. Maulana Madani said that this SIR should not be made NRC. In India, the right to vote from his urban should not be taken away. It is like snatching their rights from citizens to seek evidence of their legacy.

On Hate Speech and Hate Crime:
It was mentioned in the meeting that BJP leaders have given a lot of hate speech in recent times and in the year 2024 UP CM Yogi Adityanath has given the highest hate speech. The meeting demanded that strict laws should be enacted on this issue. And the police also do not take action on them. 13% FIR was done in these cases, most of which is the leader of the opposition. Even PM and Home Minister have given a hate speech in the Lok Sabha elections.

On the issue of caste census:
Caste census was supported in the meeting. Madani said that this is the need of Muslims. Because it is said about Muslims that there is no difference in the name of caste in their religion, but the truth is that there are many sections among Muslims such as Pasmanda and rest, they are different on the basis of caste.

On the issue of Palestine:
All the MPs involved in the meeting themselves said that the attitude of the Government of India about Palestine is not good, which has always been the policy of Prof. Palestine of India, it is being ignored, and now humanity in Palestine is in danger. The MPs said that he will soon hand over to the President, becoming a memorandum on this issue.

Prominent names present in the meeting:
Harendra Malik, SP
Ikra Hasan, SP
Mohibullah Nadvi, SP
Zia ur Rahman Burke, SP
Imran Masood, Congress
Imran Pratapgarhi, Congress
Javed Khan, Congress
Aga Ruhulla Mehndi, NC
Mian Altaf, NC
Chandrasekhar Azad

Rajya Sabha MP and Congress leader Imran Pratapgarhhi has launched a scathing attack on the resignation of Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar and the foreign tour of Prime Minister Narendra Modi. He described it as a mockery of democratic traditions and questioned whether the Prime Minister’s foreign visits have now become important from the Parliament session?

Imran Pratapgadhi wrote in a post on X, “Earlier the Parliament session started, then the Prime Minister used to return to India after finishing the tour of the world to take ‘part’, now the Parliament session starts, then the Prime Minister goes out on a foreign tour to take ‘Bhag’. The Vice President resigned from the post on the first day of the session, what will the Prime Minister leave and leave the session.

PM Modi is on a tour of two countries

Prime Minister Narendra Modi is currently on an official visit to two countries, while Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar suddenly resigned from his post on Monday (July 21, 2025). He submitted his resignation to the President citing health reasons, which was also accepted with immediate effect.

Earlier, the Parliament session started, then the Prime Minister used to return to India after finishing tour around the world to take ‘part’ in it, now if the Parliament session starts, then the Prime Minister goes out on a foreign tour to take ‘Bhag’ from it.

Vice President resigned from the post on the first day of the session,…

– Imran Pratapgarhi (@Shayarimran) July 23, 2025

Opposition raised questions on the timing of the resignation of the Vice President

The sudden resignation of Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar has created a stir in political circles. The opposition has raised serious questions on the timing of this decision. Many parties including Congress, SP and TMC have asked how the post of Vice President and Rajya Sabha Chairman was vacant when the government’s accountability was to be fixed in Parliament. Opposition leaders say that this step is against parliamentary dignities and it can harm democracy. The opposition has also sought an answer from the government on the transparency of this decision.

Also read-

P. Chidambaram’s surprise claim about Jagdeep Dhankhar, told why resignation

Congress mp imran pratapgarhi on BJP mp: BJP’s Rajya Sabha MP Ramchandra Jangra from Haryana gave a controversial statement regarding the women suffering from Pahalgam terror attack. The BJP MP said, “In the terrorist attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, women who lost the honeymoon did not have a sense of heroine, not enthusiastic and passion. So he became a victim of a bullet with folded hands and 26 people were killed.”

After this statement for women suffering from terrorist attack, MP Ramchandra Jangra is being condemned a lot. After this statement, other opposition party including Congress is calling this statement insensitive. At the same time, Congress MP Imran Pratapgarhi has retaliated, condemning this statement of BJP MP.

BJP is insulting martyrs and victims- Imran

Reversing the statement of BJP MP Ramchandra Jangra, Congress MP Imran Pratapgadhi said, “There is a competition to humiliate martyrs and victims in the Bharatiya Janata Party.” He said, “You have to say to Prime Minister Narendra Modi that your leaders should show some sensitivity towards those who are desolate.”

BJP how insensitive on this issue- Imran

Imran Pratapgarhi said, “After the Pahalgam terror attack, BJP MPs are vying to humiliate the army. First BJP leader Vijay Shah’s statement for Indian Army officer, then BJP-minded influencer trolled Himanshi Narwal and now the BJP MP’s statement clearly shows how insensitive BJP is on this issue.”

He said, “Some members of someone’s family were killed, someone’s honeymoon, but BJP leaders remain insensitive. The top leadership of the BJP should monitor these leaders. It is even more shameful that no leader has been expelled from the party till now.”

Congress MP targeted PM Modi

During this, Congress MP Imran Pratapgarhhi also targeted PM Modi. Regarding the ceasefire with Pakistan, he said, “Trump ceasefire and the heads of our country remain silent. Who has tied our army’s hands? What friendship should they do?”

He said, “The work that the Prime Minister of the country should do is doing the work that the Leader of the Opposition is doing the work.

Oposition reaction on PM modi waqf statement: Addressing a gathering in Haryana on Monday (April 15), Prime Minister Narendra Modi launched a scathing attack on the opposition on the Waqf issue. He said that if Waqf properties were properly used, Muslim youth would not have to make puncture. The Prime Minister alleged that all this is the gift of the Congress, due to which the Muslims have been harmed. He also said that the robbery that has taken place with the poor in the name of Waqf is now going to be closed. This statement of PM Modi has now been retaliated by the opposition.

AIMIM Chief Asaduddin Owaisi questioned what Modi did for poor Indians, Hindus or Muslims in the last 11 years? He said, “33% of Indians are living without jobs and studies. A major reason for Waqf’s properties is Waqf’s law and administration is always weak. PM Modi’s Waqf Amendment will weaken it further.”

Waqf ka Maalik Koi Insan Nahi Ho Sakta Balki Waqf Ka Maalik Allah Hai:- Barrister @ASADOWAISI #ASADUDDINOWAISI #WAQFAMENDMENT Bill #OWAISI #WAQFBilaMendment #WAQF #IndiaAGAINSTWAQFBill #REJCTWAQFBill pic.twitter.com/nd1ot1a3FF

– AIMIM (@Aimim_national) April 15, 2025

Imran Pratapgarhi also targeted PM Modi

Congress leader Imran Pratapgarhi said, “I am surprised that the Prime Minister of which the Prime Minister had advised the youth to fry the pakoda, he is joking on the puncture today. I have not left the youth to make a puncture or fry dumplings.” He said that the Muslim of this country does not just make punctures. This country plays a big role in the economy.

The language like “Muslims make punctures” trolls on social media, if the Prime Minister is using such superficial language, then insulting the dignity of that post. pic.twitter.com/swjm1mnq9a

– Imran Pratapgarhi (@Shayarimran) April 14, 2025

Abu Azmi’s statement also came

Samajwadi Party President Abu Asim Azmi also reacted in this matter in Maharashtra. He retaliated at the PM’s statement, saying, “If you are saying that the Muslim is making a puncture, it does not remain poor. My question is that the land of the temple is alone in the four states of South India. There are 10 lakh acres.

Also read-

‘Bought a son for 4 lakh rupees, this is not the way to get children’, SC became emotional to hear the pain of the parents of stolen children

Congress Rajya Sabha MP Imran Pratapgarhhi has got a big relief from the Supreme Court. The court has canceled the case registered against Imran in Jamnagar, Gujarat. The court has admitted that there was no thing to spoil communal harmony in the social media post for which this case was registered.

In this decision, the court has also said many things on the fundamental rights of freedom of expression of citizens and protecting the citizens from the constitution. The court has said that before registering the case in such cases, the police should review the material themselves. The case should not be filed just because someone has given a complaint.

After attending a mass marriage program in Jamnagar, Imran Pratapgarhi posted a post on social media on 2 January. In this post, he put a poem as a background audio. Kishanbhai Nanda, a resident of Jamnagar, lodged an FIR, describing a poem with words like ‘Ai Khoon’s thirsty people …’, as a communal harmony. BNS sections 196 and 197 were added to that FIR. There can be a sentence of up to 5 years in these sections.

Imran approached the Gujarat High Court to revoke this case. He argued that his aim was to promote peace and love, but the High Court Justice Sandeep Bhatt’s bench refused. The High Court said that the investigation is still in the initial stages. Imran Pratapgarhi is an MP. They should follow the legal process while taking responsibility.

Hearing Pratapgarhi’s appeal, on January 21, the Supreme Court had banned any action in the FIR lodged in Jamnagar. Now a bench of Justice Abhay S Oka and Justice Ujjwal Bhuiyan has given a detailed decision on the matter. The judges have said that it is written in the preamble of the Constitution that all citizens have freedom to think. Thoughts through arts like literature, drama, cinema are the means of expression of ideas. This describes the lives of people as meaningful.

The freedom to express its point through different means gives the Constitution under Article 19 (1) (a). In Article 19 (2), some limitations of this right have been given, but their aim is not to suppress the right to expression. Protecting the right to expression is also necessary for the Fundamental Rights (Article 21) to live respectfully, therefore, if there is a violation of freedom of expression, the constitutional courts will have to come forward to protect it.

The court has also explained Section 196 of the Indian Justice Code and Section 173 of the Indian Civil Protection Code. The court has said that if there is a complaint of spreading disharmony in the society through written or oral words, then first people with competent and independent brain should see its facts themselves. It is wrong to register an FIR directly on the complaint given by a common person. The judges have also said important comments, saying that a person does not like anything, even then it is necessary to respect his right to speak.

Also read:-
Family Dispute: ‘To evict the son from home’, the Supreme Court said- the families are ending