It is often seen that whenever a trade deal is finalized, the head of state of another country either comes to India and talks or PM Modi goes to that country and participates in the discussion. In such a situation, the question arises that if PM Modi does not even set foot in any country, can any trade deal be finalized? Let us know what is its process?

How is the deal done without the presence of PM?

Suppose if a trade deal is made between India and any country, then it is not a sudden decision, but is the result of long-running technical and diplomatic discussions. In such cases, it is not necessary for the Prime Minister or the President to be personally present every time. The real work is done by authorized representatives and officials of governments, while top leaders provide political approval and direction.

Who talks on behalf of India in that country?

With whichever country a trade deal is signed, the Indian embassy and commercial wing present there handles such negotiations. The officers posted in this wing represent the business interests of India. These people remain in direct contact with the administration of that country, its trade representatives and related agencies. Issues like tariffs, import-export rules and market access are discussed at these levels.

Who signs the deal?

This type of trade deal is not completed with the signature of any one person. Usually such a deal is in the form of a framework or agreement, which is accepted by the authorized officials of both the countries. From the Indian side, the Ministry of Commerce, Ministry of External Affairs and senior trade representatives of that country finalize the documents.

What is the role of the Prime Minister?

Whatever the issue, the role of the Prime Minister of the country is strategic and political. During any trade deal, it is kept in mind that there is no compromise with the interests of the country, but it remains ready to cooperate with the other country.

When is a deal considered final?

It is important to understand that the agreement of any trade deal is very broad. Many conditions, such as reducing non-tariff barriers or future purchase figures, may be implemented in a phased manner. This means that in future also the officials of both the countries will sit and decide its detailed rules. All these things depend on the final legal provisions of the deal.

Also read: Can’t America impose additional tariff after trade deal, know what are its rules?

Pakistan Army Involvement in Kargil: Pakistani Army Chief General Asim Munir and other senior officials paid tribute to Captain Karna Sher Khan, who was killed in the Kargil war on Saturday (July 6, 2025), describing him as a true patriot and brave soldier on the 26th death anniversary. In Pakistan, he is considered a symbol of valor and sacrifice. However, during the Kargil War, when India recovered his body in Tiger Hill (Dras Sector), Pakistan not only refused to accept his identity, but also believed that there were no soldiers of his ‘regular army’.

India revealed in 1999

On 15 July 1999, the press release issued by the Indian Embassy, ​​Washington, stated that Pakistan had completely rejected the participation of its army in the Kargil war. When India identified him on the basis of the documents found from Sher Khan’s body and contacted Pakistan, Pakistani officials first refused to accept it.

India offered to return the dead body, but Pakistan rejected

According to a TOI report, India contacted Pakistan on 12 July 1999 with the body of Pakistani soldier Captain Karilee Sher Khan, who was killed during the Kargil war. India had clearly stated that he wants to hand over this body to the Pakistan Army, but Pakistan refused it.

The press release issued by the Indian Embassy in Washington said, “It is clear that Pakistan is clear about the identity of these bodies, but it does not want to accept it as it will reveal his army involvement in Kargil.” The Indian Embassy further said, “By not accepting this truth, Pakistan is not only doing injustice to the families of its soldiers, but is also insulting the military traditions of the whole world.”

Pakistan did not accept the identity of soldiers

After refusing to contact India over the bodies of Pakistani soldiers killed during the Kargil War, Pakistan sought help from the international body Red Cross (ICRC). On 13 July 1999, the ICRC approached the Government of India and told that the Government of Pakistan wants India to hand over the bodies of the two officers to whom they have heard.

What did the Indian Embassy say?

The Indian Embassy said that Pakistan did not give information about the names and identity of the two officers killed in the request sent to ICRC, while they knew who they were. According to the embassy, ​​”Pakistan did not deliberately listen to the identity of the dead bodies because if they had accepted the identity of these officers, it would have been proved that the Pakistan Army was involved in Kargil.”

Also read-

Why does China not want to revive the Dalai Lama on India’s soil? Learn what is the reason for this