Greenland Controversy: After Venezuela, now US President Donald Trump has set his sights on Greenland. Speaking to reporters on Wednesday evening, Trump said that the US will acquire Greenland, ‘whether they want it or not’ because according to him, if the US does not do so, then Russia or China can increase their influence there. Trump said, ‘We will not allow Russia or China to become our neighbors.’

The discussion of Trump’s aggressive stance is not limited to Greenland only. Apart from the statements made earlier regarding Venezuela, Trump has also threatened ground military action in Mexico. At the same time, his Foreign Minister Marco Rubio has made it clear that he is in favor of adopting a strict policy regarding Cuba, which his critics are linking to the Far Right agenda.

Have also talked about buying

News agency Reuters had earlier quoted sources as saying that White House officials are considering the option of providing economic incentives to the residents of Greenland to separate them from Denmark and bring them closer to America. Under this, internal discussions are going on to give a lump sum amount of $ 10,000 to $ 1,00,000 (about Rs 90 lakh in Indian currency) to every citizen of Greenland. However, this scheme is still in its initial stage and no clear decision has been taken regarding the time and process of payment.

‘It’s not about possession, it’s about purchase’

US President Donald Trump’s idea of ​​”buying” Greenland is not new, but it is being considered more seriously in recent days. Foreign Minister Marco Rubio told American lawmakers that President Trump does not want to forcibly occupy Greenland, but is preferring the option of buying it. However, this stance of the Trump administration is facing strong opposition in European countries.

strategic importance of greenland

Greenland, located between Europe and North America, is the world’s largest island, with an area of ​​approximately 21,66,086 square kilometers (8,36,330 square miles). This island is currently a semi-autonomous region of Denmark. The population here is around 57,000 and this area is considered rich in natural resources, which further increases its strategic and economic importance.

It is noteworthy that both Denmark and America are NATO allies, yet Washington’s recent statements regarding Greenland have been sharply criticized. In this context, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain, Britain and Denmark issued a joint statement on Tuesday. It was clearly stated that the decision on the future of Greenland is entirely the right of Greenland and Denmark and American interference in it will not be acceptable.

Who decides when the people of a country will vote, that country or some external power? The sudden announcement of postponement of elections after the change of power in Venezuela has caught the attention of the world. The statements coming from America have sparked a debate whether the President of one country can influence the elections of another country. After President Trump’s statement, many questions have arisen in international politics.

New twist after change of power in Venezuela

The situation has changed rapidly after the change of power in Venezuela. Now international pressure has also come to the fore in this country which has been facing political and economic crisis for a long time. America has clearly said that it would not be right to hold elections immediately in Venezuela. The American side argues that it is necessary to first stabilize the country and handle the situation.

Maduro’s arrest and America’s role

After the arrest of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro in the American operation, he was presented in the American court. A few hours after this incident, US President Donald Trump’s statement came out. Trump said that elections will not be held in Venezuela within the next 30 days. This statement made it clear that America is playing a decisive role in this entire incident.

What was the reason given for postponing the elections?

America says that Venezuela is currently going through political instability, economic crisis and administrative crisis. Holding elections in such an environment may worsen the situation. According to American officials, it is necessary to first bring law and order, administration and essential services back on track, only then fair elections will be possible.

Does America have the right to say this

This is where the biggest question arises. According to international law, elections of any sovereign country are a matter of its people and its institutions. No outside country has the right to directly decide the date of elections. However, powerful countries often exert influence through political pressure, economic sanctions and diplomatic rhetoric. Simply put, Donald Trump does not legally have any direct right to postpone elections in Venezuela.

Trump’s statement and growing debate

Donald Trump’s statement is much discussed because it is directly related to the deadline. When a country like America says that elections will not be held in 30 days, it is seen not just as advice but as pressure. Many analysts believe that this statement seems like interference in the internal politics of Venezuela.

Why is international reaction important?

The eyes of the world are fixed on the case of Venezuela. Some countries may be seen supporting America’s stance, while many may consider it interference in sovereignty. It is considered certain that this issue will be raised in international forums, because elections are the foundation of any democratic country.

Also read: Which religion is dominant in Colombia, which is showing eye to America and Trump, know how many Muslims?

The situation is changing rapidly in Latin America at present. On one hand, America is adopting a strict stance regarding drug smuggling and political interference, while on the other hand, the countries there have now started responding openly. Tension has increased further after the arrest of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro. Meanwhile, the open challenge given by the President of Colombia to America is in the headlines. In such a situation, let us know how much 10 thousand Indian rupees becomes in Colombia.

Increasing conflict between America and Latin America

In recent times, bitterness is clearly visible in the relations between America and Latin American countries. This tension has come to the fore more openly after the arrest of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro. America has intensified action against drug smuggling and illegal networks, which many Latin American countries consider to be interference in their internal affairs. Now Colombia has come forward openly on this issue.

Open statement of Colombia’s President Gustavo Petro

Colombia’s President Gustavo Petro has directly challenged US President Donald Trump. Petro’s statement is much discussed, in which he said, “Come take me, I am waiting.” This statement is not just being considered a political reaction, but is being seen as an open disagreement against America’s policies. It is clear from this that Colombia is no longer in a mood to bow down to pressure.

Value of Indian Rupee in Colombia

If we talk about Indian currency, then 10 thousand Indian rupees have a good value in Colombia. As per the current exchange rate, Rs 10,000 from India becomes equal to 4,18,773.14 Colombian pesos in Colombia. This figure shows that there is a big difference between the currencies of the two countries, and that is why it is important for Indians to estimate their expenditure and budget in advance.

What does it mean for travelers and businessmen?

This information is very important for those who go to Colombia for tourism or business. By having a correct idea of ​​currency exchange, travel budget, hotel expenses, food and drink and local transport can be planned easily. Also, business people also keep this currency difference in mind while making payments and finalizing deals.

Also read: When the temperature drops to what extent, a day is called a cold day, what is its definition?

India-US Relations: US President Donald Trump has once again talked about his relationship with Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Trump said that relations between the two are good, but PM Modi is not happy with the heavy tariffs imposed on India for the purchase of Russian oil.

Referring to his conversation with PM Modi during the House GOP member retreat, Trump said that relations between America and India are still friendly, but the tariff issue is creating tension. He also talked about the discussions he had with PM Modi regarding defense deals and tariffs.

Trump said this

Trump said, ‘I have a very good relationship with Prime Minister Modi, but he is not happy with me because India has to pay higher tariffs. However, now they have reduced oil purchases from Russia to a great extent. America has imposed a total of 50 percent tariffs on India, out of which 25 percent tariffs have been imposed for purchasing oil from Russia. America believes that by buying oil from Russia, India is indirectly strengthening Russia’s economy, while the Russia-Ukraine war continues. This statement of Trump has come at a time when a day earlier he had warned that if India does not address American concerns regarding oil imports from Russia, then tariffs on Indian goods can be further increased.

‘Modi knew I was not happy’

Trump said, ‘Modi knew that I was not happy. He wanted to make me happy. Modi is a very good person. In his speech, Trump also defended the tariff policy and said that America is benefiting economically from it. He also said that America is using tariffs to protect its interests.

In recent times, Trump has been continuously putting pressure on India to buy oil from Russia. They allege that India is giving financial help to Russia by buying cheap Russian oil. For this reason, higher duty has been imposed on Indian products.

India had rejected Trump’s claim

However, India has already rejected Trump’s claim that PM Modi has assured to stop purchasing oil from Russia. India has made it clear that no such talks or promises have taken place. Meanwhile, Trump is also presenting himself as a mediator in the Russia-Ukraine war. He has talked to Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, although no concrete results have been announced yet.

Venezuela’s politics and America’s military action have shaken the world. President Nicolas Maduro, arrested by American soldiers, is now kept in America’s most controversial and scary prison in New York. Maduro’s stay in this prison, infamous for violence, overcrowding, darkness and fear, is raising many questions whether it is just imprisonment or is it also a big message in world politics? Let us find out why it is called America’s most scary and infamous prison.

Maduro’s arrest and bringing to America

President Nicolas Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores have been arrested in the US military action on Venezuela. Maduro was handcuffed when he got off the plane at Stewart Air National Guard Base in New York on Saturday. His first video surfaced, in which he was seen smilingly walking into the facility with two DEA officers. Maduro walked into the hall saying ‘Good night, Happy New Year’ to his colleagues.

American officials had detained Maduro from the military base in Caracas. After reaching New York, his next destination is the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC).

Why is the Metropolitan Detention Center infamous?

The MDC Metropolitan Detention Center is a federal prison in New York, which was built in the 1990s to reduce overcrowding. This prison is infamous for its filth, lack of staff, violence against prisoners and long power cuts. Many high-profile prisoners have lived here, like singer R. Kelly, Martin Scherli, Jeffrey Epstein’s associate socialite Ghislaine Maxwell and drug cartel leader Ismael ‘El Mayo’ Zambada Garcia, among others.

violence and poor conditions

Violence among prisoners is common in the MDC. Reports suggest that a prisoner was stabbed to death here in June 2024. A month later, another prisoner died in a fight. Earlier in 2019, prisoners were trapped in severe cold and darkness due to power cut for a week. After this, the Justice Department investigated and gave a settlement of 10 million dollars to 1600 affected prisoners.

Such conditions of prisoners have made MDC one of the scariest prisons in the world. This prison can prove to be a mental and physical challenge for Maduro.

Maduro’s legal status

Maduro will be presented in federal court in New York, where charges of drug trafficking and financial crimes could be brought against him. According to American media, this step is part of America’s strict policy and an effort to send a message at the international level.

Also read: Is America’s attack on Venezuela a sign of Third World War? If the issue escalates, which country will support whom?

America carried out a massive attack in Venezuela on Saturday (January 03, 2026). The US Army arrested Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores. According to the US Foreign Secretary, a criminal trial will be conducted against him in America. On the other hand, Russia got angry over this action of America and on the other hand, the European Union distanced itself from the matter. Many countries around the world, including Russia and Iran, strongly criticized the American attack and called it a ‘blatant violation’ of the country’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.

Russia has expressed its anger over this action of America. The Russian Foreign Ministry described the US action as ‘very worrying’ and condemnable and said, ‘The excuses used to justify such actions are useless. Ideological enmity has won over practical business-like thinking and the desire to build trust and pre-arranged relationships.

Latin America should remain a region of peace: Russia

Russia stressed that all partners who have grievances against each other should find a solution through dialogue and stop further escalation. The statement further said, ‘Latin America must remain the same peaceful region that it described itself as in 2014, and Venezuela must have the right to determine its own destiny without any harmful outside interference, let alone military.’

Russia further said that we reaffirm our solidarity with the Venezuelan people and our support for their Bolivarian leadership path, which is aimed at safeguarding the country’s national interests and sovereignty.

We condemn this action of America: China

China’s Foreign Ministry has said that it is shocked by the airstrike taken by America against a sovereign country and the action taken against its President. Also strongly condemns this action of US. China said, ‘Such hegemonic actions of the US seriously violate international law and Venezuela’s sovereignty. Also, there is a threat to peace and security in Latin America and the Caribbean region. China strongly opposes this.

The Foreign Ministry said, ‘We call on the US to adhere to the purposes and principles of international law and the UN Charter and to stop violating the sovereignty and security of other countries.’

What did Cuba say on America’s military action?

News agency Xinhua reported that Cuban President Miguel Diaz-Canel also condemned America’s ‘criminal attack’ against Venezuela on Saturday and demanded an immediate response from the international community.

In a social media post, President Canales said that Latin America is being brutally attacked. He called it state terrorism against the brave people of Venezuela and our America. Cuban Foreign Minister Bruno Rodriguez also condemned the attack and said the bombings and military action in Caracas and other areas of the country were acts of cowardice against a country that has not attacked the United States or any other country.

America’s action against the principles of UN Charter: Iran

Iran’s ministry also strongly condemned the US military attack on Venezuela, calling the attack an “act of aggression” and a clear violation of the United Nations Charter and basic principles of international law.

Iran reaffirmed Venezuela’s right to defend its national sovereignty, territorial integrity, and right to self-determination, and urged the international community to fulfill its legal and moral responsibilities by immediately stopping the US attack on the country.

What was the reaction of the European Union to American action?

Kaja Kallas, the European Union’s high representative for foreign affairs and security policy and vice-president of the European Commission, said, ‘I have spoken to Foreign Secretary Marco Rubio and our ambassador in Caracas. The EU is closely monitoring the situation in Venezuela. The EU has repeatedly said Maduro lacks legitimacy and has defended a peaceful transition. In all circumstances, the principles of international law and the UN Charter must be respected. We appeal for patience. The safety of EU citizens in the country is our biggest priority.

America’s MP criticized Trump

Condemning Trump’s move, American leader Jim McGovern wrote, ‘Without seeking permission from Congress and despite most Americans being against military action, Trump has launched a wrongful, illegal attack on Venezuela. He says we don’t have enough money for healthcare for Americans, but somehow we have unlimited funds for war?

British MP surrounds Trump

Another British MP, Jeremy Corbyn, strongly criticized Trump’s action and said, ‘America has launched an unprovoked and illegal attack on Venezuela. This is an open attempt to gain control over Venezuela’s natural resources. This is an act of war that puts the lives of millions of people at risk and should be condemned by everyone who believes in sovereignty and international law.

What is Spain’s reaction?

Santiago Abascal, president of Spain’s VOX party, wrote, ‘Today the world is a little more free. We should be happy for this and support the restoration of democracy in Venezuela. We will work for this with our colleagues from the Madrid Forum. On the contrary, Pedro Sanchez (PM of Spain) will be very upset. Maduro’s fall is a bigger blow to the Sanchista mafia than the arrest of Abalos and Cerdán.

British MP Zara Sultana said, ‘Venezuela has the world’s largest oil reserves and this is no coincidence. This is America’s open imperialism. An illegal attack on Caracas aimed at removing an independent government and plundering its resources. Starmer’s Labor government should clearly condemn this. Solidarity with the Venezuelan people.

Spain’s Health Minister wrote on the social media platform X, ‘A unilateral military attack to violate the independence of any country is wrong, whether it is Palestine, Ukraine or Venezuela. We must immediately return to a world based on international law and rules, dialogue and cooperation.

Albanian Prime Minister Eddie Rama joked the US President Donald Trump’s mistake during a meeting of European Political Community (EPC) in Copenhagen, the capital of Denmark. His conversation was captured on camera, and the video is becoming increasingly viral on social media.

It can be seen in the video that Rama is talking smiling with French President Emmanuel Macron and Azerbaijan President Ilham Aliyev. He made a mild joke about Trump’s world map and international understanding, on which both the heads of state also laughed. Rama said, “You should apologize to us because you did not congratulate us on the peace agreement made by President Trump between Albania and Azerbaijan.”

Trump’s mistakes are being considered responsible

Trump’s frequent mistakes are being believed to be the direct reason for this incident. The US President did not distinguish between many Eastern European countries and the struggle areas in the past. In an interview to Fox News in September 2024, Trump accidentally said that he ended the war between Azerbaijan and Albania, while the real struggle was between Armenia and Azerbaijan.

Trump also gave wrong information many times

Trump also gave wrong information about geography several times in a press conference with British Prime Minister Kir Stmper and a dinner meat. He claimed to end the war between Cambodia and Armenia, while these countries are at a distance of over 4,000 miles from each other and never joined the mutual conflict.

This video and Rama’s laughing response created a slight smile among global leaders and it is being shared fast on social media.

Also read-

What did former Pakistan player Sana Mir say about Kashmir, created a ruckus! Now said- ‘In my heart …’

Pakistan and Saudi Arabia signed a strategic mutual defense agreement on 17 September, under which an attack on either of the two countries would be considered an attack on both. The agreement has created a new stir in regional and global strategic equations including India. Experts believe that this step will strengthen military and political relations between Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, while security challenges for India may also increase.

Saudi Arabia’s ambition and Pakistan’s dependence
According to well-known journalist Brahma Chelani, this agreement is not a symbol of Pakistan’s power, because the country is on the verge of financial crisis, but shows Saudi Arabia’s ambitions. Saudi Arabia wants to strengthen its regional grip using Pakistan’s military and nuclear resources and is also giving a message that it will decide his strategy himself.

Riyadh Knew India would construct the saudi-pakistan mutual defense pact as a directed to its security, Yet it is ahead. The move reflects not Pakistan’s strength – it remains on the brink of bankruptcy – but saudi arabia’s ambitions.

By binding a chronically dependent…

– Dr. Brahma cheellanyy (@chellanyy) September 18, 2025

Political message is hidden behind the decision
Chelani also said that the agreement on Modi’s birthday indicates that Saudi Arabia is carrying forward its political and strategic interests regardless of India’s sensations. India tried to form a strong relationship with Saudi Arabia through growing defense partnership and joint military exercises.

Modi has spent years wooing saudi arabia, upgrading ties to a comprehensive strategic partnership and making repeated visits, including a key trip in April. Yet, on Modi’s Birthday, Crown Prince salman delivered a nasty surprise: a saudi -pakistan mutual defense pact declaring…

– Dr. Brahma cheellanyy (@chellanyy) September 18, 2025

Pakistan gets new support
According to expert Michael Kugelman, Pakistan has entered into this agreement with a colleague who is also an important partner of India. After the agreement, Pakistan has got the support of three major powers like China, Türkiye and now Saudi Arabia. However, he believes that this agreement will not prevent India from attacking Pakistan, but Pakistan’s situation has become stronger.

Pakistan has not only inked a new mutual defense pact, it inked it with a close all that’s also a top partner of India’s. This pact would not deter India from Attacking Pakistan. But with 3 key power-china, turkey & now ksa-fitted on pak’s side, pak is in a very good place.

– Michael kugelman (@Michaelkugelman) September 18, 2025

Regional and global strategic impact
The agreement has created new security and diplomatic landscapes for India, America and other global powers. This makes it clear that Saudi Arabia and Pakistan together can affect the regional power balance and use military and political resources for their interests.

In India, when a leader is accused of corruption or any other serious crime, questions arise from the public and the opposition whether he will continue in the post now. We all have seen many times that some leaders sit in their post despite arrest. This was seen during the time of former Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal, when he did not resign from his post even while in jail. This not only breaks the trust of the public, but also spoils the image of democracy.

A big and historical step is being taken in Parliament to deal with such situations. A new Constitution Amendment Bill (130th Constitution Amendment Bill) has been introduced, which is aimed at that if a Prime Minister, Chief Minister or Minister is arrested in a serious crime and remains in jail for 30 days, his post will automatically go on. In such a situation, let us know what this new rule says, how will it work and what are the laws about it in other countries.

What is the new constitutional amendment bill?

The new Constitution Amendment Bill talks about changes in the Constitution of India, two essential articles, Article 75 and Article 164. Both these articles are associated with the posts and appointments of ministers of the center and states. In Article 75, a new provision will be added to Provision 5 (A) and Article 164, which will apply to the Prime Minister, Chief Minister, Union Minister and Minister of State. If a minister or Chief Minister is arrested in a crime in which he can be sentenced to 5 years or more and he remains in police custody for 30 days, then he will not hold his post from 31st day. He will be removed from the post by the President (or Governor). If the Prime Minister (or Chief Minister) himself is implicated in the charge and does not resign, then his post will automatically end.

Why is this rule important?

There are many examples in India when the leaders did not leave their post even after arrest. In such cases the image of the government is tarnished and the opposition repeatedly demands resignation. After this bill, the opposition will not have to ask for resignation and if a minister is in jail and the bell is not found, then after 30 days his post will go on its own. If a minister is arrested for committing such a crime, in which he can be sentenced to at least 5 years and remains in custody for 30 days, then he will either have to resign, or he will be considered removed from the post on the 31st day.

What is such rules in other countries?

If we compare this new rule of India to other democratic countries, then we will find that the accountability and morality of the leaders are given more importance there. There are such rules in many countries, where there is a moral pressure to resign as soon as a case is accused. For example, in Israel, Japan, Britain, South Africa, Australia, many times without court decisions, resigned on the basis of investigation. Ethics and responsibility are given great importance in these countries. Many times leaders also leave the post only because of rumors. With this, if a serious matter proves to be against the President or the Governor, then the process of impachment can begin.

Also read: These 10 states of India remain the most unemployed, seeing the figures will fly away

Donald Trump on Iran Nuclear Program: US President Donald Trump on Friday (June 20, 2025) dismissed an intelligence report on Iran’s nuclear program. He said that his opinion of Tulsi Gabbard himself is wrong in this matter. Talking to reporters in New Jersey, Trump said, “My intelligence agency was wrong in this matter.” When he was told that Gabbard made this statement, he reiterated that he is wrong.

This statement has come at a time when tension in the middle East is continuously increasing. The pressure of America and its associates is increasing on Iran, especially with its nuclear program. Earlier in March, Tulsi Gabbard told US lawmakers that intelligence agencies believe that Iran has not taken any decision to make nuclear weapons.

Donald Trump said this big thing

Donald Trump said he does not understand why Iran needs nuclear power, when it already has one of the world’s largest oil reserves. He said, “If they have so much oil then why do they need nuclear power?”

Trump raised questions about the defense spending of NATO countries

Along with this, Trump also raised questions about the defense spending of NATO countries. He said that America does not need to accept the target of 5% GDP defense spending of NATO, but the rest of the countries should accept it.

Trump criticized Spain

Trump criticized Spain and said that he spends very little money and he also turned down the proposal for defense spending. He said, “Either they are very good deals, or are not doing the right thing. I think Spain should contribute as much as the rest of the countries.”

Also read-

‘No matter how much peace I make, but …’, the pain of the trump after the Congo-Ravanda Peace Deal; Expressed Nobel Prize wish