Quoting Prophet Mohammed’s famous statement regarding immediate payment on completion of work, Judge GR Swaminathan has directed the Madurai Municipal Corporation to pay the outstanding fees of its former lawyer. Madurai Bench Judge Swaminathan strongly condemned the practice of appointing lawyers who charge huge fees for a single appearance in the court.

He cited a case in which a senior lawyer was paid Rs 4 lakh per appearance. He said that the university, which is arguing that its financial condition is such that it is unable to pay the dues of its retired employees, then how is it paying such high fees to its lawyers.

According to PTI report, he remarked that the Additional Advocate General appears even in those minor cases where his presence is not really required and which can be handled even by a person inexperienced as a government lawyer. All this happens for money. He said that the time has come to conduct an audit regarding the fees paid to law officers.

Former permanent counsel of the corporation had filed the petition

Former Municipal Corporation standing counsel P. Thirumalai had sought direction to Madurai Corporation to pay the fees of Rs 13.05 lakh for representing the Municipal Corporation in several cases. Judge Swaminathan said in his order dated December 19, ‘Give the employee the fruits of his hard work even before his sweat dries.’ This instruction is related to Prophet Mohammad.

what is the whole matter

The petitioner was the standing counsel for Madurai Municipal Corporation for more than 14 years from 1992 to 2006. He represented the Corporation in Madurai District Courts. His complaint was that the corporation did not pay his fees. So he filed a petition in 2006 demanding payment. According to the petitioner, the corporation was supposed to pay him Rs 14.07 lakh, but it has paid only Rs 1.02 lakh and Rs 13.05 lakh is still outstanding. The petitioners appeared in 818 cases and their financial condition was poor.

Keeping all these things in mind, the court directed the Legal Services Authority attached to Madurai District Court to verify the list of cases, obtain certified copies and provide it to the petitioner within two months. The corporation has been directed to pay the bills within the next two months without interest.

read this also

From Delhi, UP to Bihar… severe cold in North India, dense fog increased the problem, know IMD’s alert

Courts not only deliver verdicts, but also create confidence in the minds of people about justice. An ordinary citizen goes to the court because he has faith that the judge will look at his case without any bias or prejudice and he will get justice. India’s justice system rests on this trust. Therefore, sometimes judges recuse themselves from hearing a particular case, so that the message is not sent that there may be any personal bias in the decision.

In the last few years, it happened many times that some judges of the Supreme Court or High Court recused themselves from a case. Sometimes reasons are given, sometimes not, but the question arises that how can a judge recuse himself from a case and what difference does it make to his career?

How can a judge recuse himself from a case?

This is called Recusal in English i.e. withdrawing oneself from the hearing of a case. The main reason for this is conflict of interest. Meaning, any relationship, background or association that people feel could influence the judge’s decision. As if the judge is from the same state where the case is related to. There may be a past acquaintance or professional relationship with any party, the judge may have previously been an advocate in the same case, the judge may have shares or interests in any organization related to that case.

Does the judge have to give reasons?
There is no fixed rule that the judge has to be told why he is stepping aside. Sometimes the judge himself gives the reason, sometimes he silently withdraws without giving any reason, it completely depends on the judge. However, there are some ethical guidelines. For example, if a judge has shares in a company, he cannot hear cases of the same company. Apart from this, if the judge has previously been a lawyer in a case, then he should withdraw from that case.

What happens to the case if the judge withdraws?

The case is given to another judge or a new bench. Who to give is decided by the Chief Justice in the High Court and the CJI in the Supreme Court. Sometimes a judge is changed and sometimes the entire bench is changed. Whereas the judge recusing from the case is a normal process. This is considered sensible and moral. Many times this step increases the credibility of the judiciary. It is clear from this that for the purpose of justice, a judge’s withdrawal from a particular hearing or case does not affect his career in any way.

Read also Apart from triple talaq, how many types of divorce are there, what is the difference between them?

Education Loan Information:
Calculate Education Loan EMI

Two senior judges of the Supreme Court of Pakistan resigned on Thursday (13 November) in protest against the 27th constitutional amendment. They allege that this amendment weakens the Constitution of Pakistan and is going to destroy the independence of the judiciary. Let us tell you that just a few hours after Pakistan President Asif Ali Zardari approved the controversial 27th Constitution Amendment, Justice Mansoor Ali Shah and Athar Minallah resigned from their posts.

This amendment was the final step towards making the law after being passed by both houses of the Pakistani Parliament. Under the amended law, a Federal Constitutional Court will be formed in Pakistan, which will hear constitutional cases. The existing Supreme Court will be limited to civil and criminal cases only.

What did Mansoor Ali Shah write in his resignation letter?
Justice Mansoor Ali Shah wrote in his resignation letter that this amendment is a serious attack on the Constitution of Pakistan. This ends the powers of the Supreme Court. Brings the judiciary under the executive and attacks the roots of constitutional democracy. By breaking the unity of the Supreme Court of the country, this amendment has crippled judicial independence and integrity and set the country back decades.. This subversion of the constitutional order will not last long and will be reversed with time, but by then it will leave deep wounds on this institution.

He said that continuing in office would not only be tantamount to tacitly accepting a constitutional mistake, but would also mean sitting in a court whose constitutional voice has been suppressed. I cannot protect the Constitution while serving in such a weak court.

What reason did Justice Minallah give for his resignation?
Justice Minallah wrote in his resignation letter that before the passage of the 27th Amendment, I had written a letter to the Chief Justice of Pakistan expressing my concern over what its proposed provisions would mean for our constitutional system. Amidst their silence, those apprehensions have now been proven true. The Constitution I had sworn to protect is no more. There can be no greater attack on its memory than the fact that the foundation of the 27th Constitutional Amendment rests on the grave of the Constitution which I had sworn to uphold. Now that Constitution is no more. In the new system, for me, wearing the attire of a judge has now become a symbol of betrayal, hence I cannot continue in this post.

What changes will happen with the 27th constitutional amendment?
The Army Chief and Chief of Defense Force will be appointed by the President on the advice of the Prime Minister. The post of Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee will expire on 27 November 2025. The head of the National Strategic Command will be from the Pakistan Army. Posts like Field Marshal, Marshal of the Air Force, Admiral of the Fleet will be for life. Experts say that this amendment is the biggest attack on the independence of the judiciary.

read this also

Red Fort blast: Five more detained, including two doctors associated with Al-Falah University, accused met Jaish handlers in Dubai

Patna High Court has received a new Chief Justice. Patna High Court’s new Justice Pawan Kumar Bhimappa Bajantari was sworn in by Governor Arif Mohammad Khan at Raj Bhavan on Sunday. President Draupadi Murmu approved the appointment of Justice Bajantari on Saturday. CM Nitish Kumar, Deputy Chief Minister Emperor Chaudhary, several prominent personalities of the political and political world were present on the occasion.

Bihar’s judicial system will benefit

Pawan Kumar Bhimappa Bajantari has become the 46th Chief Justice of Patna High Court. Justice Bajantari is being seen as a new energy and new direction communication in the Patna High Court and Bihar’s judiciary. In many high courts of the country, the benefit of their long legal experiences will now be given to the judicial system of Bihar.

In fact, former Chief Justice of Patna High Court Justice Vipul M. Pancholi has been appointed as a judge of the Supreme Court. The tenure of Justice Pancholi will be long and will also act as the Chief Justice of India (CJI) from October 2031 to May 2033.

Pawan Kumar Bhimappa Bajantari first enrolled as a lawyer in the Bar Council of Karnataka High Court in 1990. During this period, he practiced in various legal branches and appeared in the High Court on behalf of Karnataka Public Service Commission.

He was then appointed as Additional Judge of Karnataka High Court on 2 January 2015. On 16 March 2015, he was transferred to the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Nearly three and a half years later, on November 17, 2018, he returned to his original Karnataka High Court.

Law degree from SJR Law College, Bengaluru

Please tell that the new judge of Patna High Court Pawan Kumar Bhimappa Bajanti was born on 23 October 1963. He received his early education at the Vidyavadhak Sangh in Dharwad, a 135 -year -old Kannada cultural organization. He completed his further education in schools affiliated to the Karnataka Lingayat Education Committee. After graduation, he obtained a law degree from SJR Law College, Bangalore.

Also read: Bihar STF Raid: Raids of former MLC candidate Rais Khan of Siwan, created a stir

Former Chief Justice of India Dhananjay Yashwant Chandrachud has made a shocking disclosure by sharing his experiences as a CJI. He said that once a judge of the Karnataka High Court had called the Muslim dominated area as Pakistan, I did not like this.

DY Chandrachud told that he himself took cognizance and saw this matter. He has revealed this in an interview to The Lalantop. Chandrachud said, “As far as I remember. A case related to the Motor Vehicles Act was being heard in the Karnataka High Court. During this time a judge said,” The place that is ahead of this bridge is Pakistan. ” I saw a video related to this.

‘Judge’s decisions affect society’

DVI Chandrachud further said, “After the report came out, it was found that the judge had said this. I gave a small decision that no judge should say this. What you say or what you should have a dignity while giving the verdict. It affects the society.”

What did DY Chandrachud say on Justice Yashwant Verma?

During this time, he was also asked about the money received from Allahabad High Court judge Justice Yashwant Verma’s residence in Delhi. On this, he said that there should have been an FIR in this matter. However, he also questioned whether he had money or met his house? They should be given a chance to hear. He said, “Did his money be found in his house? Let’s not decide on this issue before giving the judge a full hearing opportunity.”

Should there have been an FIR file against Judge Yashwant Verma? On this, former CJI Chandrachud said that Zee is absolutely right that the FIR should be filed. The Vice President of that time, he commented a couple of times. Work should have been allowed, because if people come to the high constitutional post, then there should be some restraint on what you comment.

Also read

‘India has a weak Prime Minister’, Trump changes the H-1B visa rules and the first reaction of Rahul Gandhi

One of America’s most popular and well-known judges, Frank Capriyo died at the age of 88. He died of Panctivity Cancer. Judge Capriyo was famous not only for his decisions but also for his kind nature and welfare decisions. His death made his fans very grieved in America and all over the world.

Life and career

Judge Capriyo was known worldwide through a reality show called “Catch in Providence”. In this show, he heard traffic and small cases in his unique and kind style. His style was always full of humanity and understanding. A video of him became very viral on social media, in which he waived the invoices of an elderly man’s overspeed. He said that this was the first time that the elderly drove the car at a speed higher than the limit. His sympathy and kindness were clearly visible in this small decision.

How dangerous is pancreatic cancer

Judge Frank Capriyo died due to pancreatic cancer. It begins in cancer pancreas, which is an important organ inside the stomach and helps in digestion and insulin production.

Difficulty in identification

Pancreatic cancer often shows no obvious symptoms in the early stage. Therefore, it often comes to know when the disease has increased considerably.

Rapid spread cancer

This cancer can spread quickly and reach nearby organs such as liver, stomach and blood cells. This is why it becomes difficult to treat.

High mortality rate

The chances of surviving due to pancreatic cancer are very low. Most patients do not survive within 5 years of diagnosis, especially if the cancer is in advance stage.

Symptoms and signs

The main symptoms are stomach or back pain, weight phenomenon, yellowing of skin and eyes, loss of appetite. When it increases very much, the health of the patient deteriorates quickly.

Cure challenges

Surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy are the main options for treatment. But it is difficult to remove cancer in advance stage.

Pancreatic cancer is considered one of the most dangerous cancer in the world. Its initial identity makes it more serious to spread difficult and rapidly. Timely investigation, focusing on health and not ignoring the symptoms is the biggest way to prevent it.

Also read- If the sharp pain in these parts of the body is understood, then cholesterol has increased, 99 % people do ignorant

Check out Below Health Tools-
Calculate your body mass index (BMI)

Calculate the age through age calculator

Retired Judge B.B. on Tuesday (August 19, 2025) on behalf of India alliance for the post of Vice President. The name of Sudarshan Reddy has been announced. Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge gave information about this by holding a press conference. During this time, Sharad Pawar and many big leaders of the alliance were present with him.

Former Supreme Court judge and Lokayukta of Goa B. Sudarshan Reddy was born in 1946 in Andhra Pradesh. He comes from a farmer family. He wrote his studies in Hyderabad and received a law degree from Osmania University in 1971.

#Watch Former Supreme Court Judge B. Sudershan Reddy Named India Alliance Candidate for the Vice President post

Congress National President Mallikarjun Kharge Says, “B. Sudershan Reddy is One of India’s Most Distining and Progressive Jurists. He has a long and eminent… pic.twitter.com/xfoi0cohlp

– ANI (@ani) August 19, 2025

Who is B. Sudarshan Reddy?

B. Sudarshan Reddy was nominated as an advocate at the Andhra Pradesh Bar Council in Hyderabad on 27 December 1971. He has practiced in writ and civil matters in Andhra Pradesh High Court. He served as a government lawyer in the High Court during 1988-90. During 1990, he has also served as an additional permanent lawyer of the Central Government for a period of 6 months.

B. Sudarshan Reddy also served as a legal advisor and permanent lawyer of Osmania University. He was appointed a permanent judge of the Andhra Pradesh High Court on May 2, 1995. He was then appointed as the Chief Justice of the Guwahati High Court on 5 December 2005. Apart from this, he was appointed as a judge of the Supreme Court of India on 12 January 2007, from where he retired on 8 July 2011.

Also read

Vice President Election 2025: Winner South and losers also … CP Radhakrishna Vs in Vice President Election Jung in Sudarshan Reddy

Fir against judge: The case of Delhi High Court judge Yashwant Verma is currently hot in the country. When Chief Justice DK Upadhyay submitted a report of fire in the house of Judge Yashwant Verma to CJI Sanjeev Khanna, it mentioned the currency getting a currency from his house in a half -conditioned condition. However, Justice Verma rejected the matter of getting the money and said that he was not aware that there was cash in his storeroom. He directly said that we were neither shown nor handed over a sack of burnt posture. However, this is not the first time that a judge is accused of corruption. Let us tell you that for the first time an FIR was registered against which judge of the High Court.

SN Shukla was accused of corruption

During the Allahabad High Court judge, the CBI registered a case of corruption against Justice SN Shukla in December 2019. He was accused that he had helped by passing a favorable order to a medical college in Lucknow for money. In such a situation, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, Ranjan Gogoi, had allowed the CBI to register a case under the Prevention of Karps Act against SN Shukla of the High Court. This was the first time in history that the Supreme Court had allowed the CBI to register a case regarding the High Court judge.

What is the whole matter

Actually, this whole matter is related to Prasad Institute of Medical Sciences on Kanpur Road. This is of SP leaders BP Yadav and Palash Yadav. When the Medical Council of India visited here in the year 2017, it was found that basic facilities are not good. There was no complete standard for medical studies. After this, the order was received that 46 medical colleges of the country including Prasad Institute should be banned from not meeting the standards, and the ban was imposed.

Justice SN Shukla’s bench gave the decision

After this, the Prasad Institute approached the Supreme Court, but the bench of the then Chief Justice Deepak Mishra did not give relief to the medical colleges. He then filed a petition in the Allahabad High Court. It was heard by the bench of Justice SN Shukla. Justice SN Shukla allowed Prasad Institute to take new admissions. After this, there was a stir in the rest of the medical colleges and the control of Justice SN Shukla started tight.