Think what will happen if a person files an appeal in the court in the name XXX? It may be that on the very first day, Judge Sir reprimanded the appeal court. But if a judge has done the same thing himself? Yes, such a surprising case has come to light, in this case, the High Court judge himself has filed a petition in the Supreme Court named XXX. Actually, these judges are Justice Yashwant Verma, who are facing a proposal in the case of cash sack found at their residence. In such a situation, there is also a question whether a common man can also file a petition in this way?

When and why the name of this method is used

Justice Dipankar Dutta and Justice Augustine George Christ heard this petition by Justice Yashwant Verma. His name has been written in this petition. This method is used to hide the identity of female petitioners victims of sexual harassment or sexual assault in court records. It is also used to hide the identity of adolescents and minors in the controversies of married custody. Because the court says that they should not tell the name of the rape victim in the judgment.

What is in Justice Verma’s appeal?

Justice Verma, in a petition called XXX, appealed to declare the report of the Internal Investigation Committee invalid, in which he was found guilty for the recovery of cash. Justice Verma has also requested that Sanjeev Khanna’s recommendation of May 8 should also be canceled. In this, an appeal was made against him to start impeachment proceedings in Parliament.

Why petition filed as XXX

Justice Verma has filed a petition for approval not to reveal his identity. In this petition, he has said that if his petition is not approved, he may have to face irreparable losses. That is why he sought approval to register in the name XXX in his petition, so that his identity could be hidden.

ALSO READ: The world’s first lipstick was made of deer fat, this company presented in the market

First day of monsoon session Jagdeep Dhankhar The resignation from the post of Vice President has created a political stir. During this short tenure, many controversies were added to his name. Many times he got entangled with the opposition and many times questioned the government and crossed the ‘Laxman Rekha’. National Judicial Appointment Commission (NJAC) He also raised questions on the Supreme Court’s decision to cancel the act.

Jagdeep Dhankhar On Monday (21 July 2025) from 63 opposition MPs Justice Yashwant Verma received a notice to remove from the post. He accepted the notice of opposition without informing the BJP. Government Impeachment Wanted to pass the proposal in the Lok Sabha earlier. It would be promoted as the success of the government and a clear message was given to the judiciary, but Opposition Has won first.

Dhankhar When did I cross the ‘Laxman Rekha’?

During his tenure as Vice President Dhankhar With opposition Uncontrollably There was a conflict. He was accused of being biased. Due to these allegations, a no -confidence motion was brought against him last year. Since then, the government is worried about the change in their functioning. Now opposition leaders are getting a chance to speak more.

Questions asked from the government on the farmers’ movement

Dhankhar Minimum support price (Msp) For the protest of farmers running since 2020, the government was taken over. In December 2024, he speaking at a public event Shivraj Lion Chauhan Was asked sharp questions from. They He told the Agriculture Minister present on the stage, ,I request you That Please tell me what to the farmer Promise Did Went Was, Promise Complete Why No to be done? Last year there was a movement. There is a movement this year too. The wheel of time is moving.

Targeting Supreme Court

Earlier this month Jagdeep Dhankhar Done Justice Yashwant Verma had targeted the judiciary over the dispute. They cash Seizure Demanded to start a criminal investigation in the case of. He gave the National Judicial Appointment Commission (Njac) Questions should also be raised on the Supreme Court’s decision to cancel the Act. He had asked the question that how can the Supreme Court cancel the law passed almost unanimously by both houses of Parliament?

Government became angry on Raghav Chadha case

Rajya Sabha MP of Aam Aadmi Party for not following the rules of the House 11 The Rajya Sabha was suspended on August 2023. Dhankhar The government ended his suspension, which angered the government. However in this case Aap The MP also moved the Supreme Court.

Also read: Formation of Electoral College, Appointment of Returning Officer … EC started preparations for Vice President’s election after Jagdeep Dhankhar resignation

Justice Yashwant Verma Cash Case: The Delhi High Court Judge Cash scandal has taken a significant turn. Supreme Court Chief Justice Sanjeev Khanna has sent the report of the 3 -member in House Committee to the President and the Prime Minister to investigate the case. The judge Justice Yashwant Verma is accused of keeping illegal cash, the Chief Justice has also sent his reply to the President and the Prime Minister. The Chief Justice has taken this step after discussing with all the judges of the Supreme Court.

In the opinion of experts, it seems to be the first step of starting the process of impeachment in Parliament to remove Justice Verma from the post. It had already come into the discussion that the investigation committee has confirmed the burning of cash at the judge’s house and later removed from there.

Justice Verma refuses to resign

After receiving this report on 4 May, the Chief Justice asked Justice Yashwant Verma to reply in 2 days. Justice Verma was asked to consider resigning. The way the President and the Prime Minister have been made aware of the matter by the Chief Justice, it is clear that Justice Verma has refused to resign.

On the night of 14 March, there was a fire at the official residence of Justice Verma, who has been transferred from the Delhi High Court. After this, a large amount of burnt cash was allegedly found there. Taking complete transparency in the case, Supreme Court Chief Justice Sanjeev Khanna made all the available facts including the video of the incident public.

The investigation committee of 3 judges was formed

On March 22, Chief Justice Khanna constituted the investigation committee of 3 judges to further investigate the case. Members of this committee were- Chief Justice Sheel Nagu of Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chief Justice of Himachal Pradesh High Court GS Sandhavalia and Karnataka High Court Judge Anu Shivraman.

As soon as he started the investigation on March 25, the committee visited 30 Tughlaq Crescent i.e. Justice Verma’s government bungalow. The three judges inspected the room where there was a fire. The committee also conducted videography of the scene. The Investigation Committee spoke to the Delhi Police Commissioner, the head of the Delhi Fire Department and the policemen present at the scene, the fire department. The committee also talked to Justice Verma’s staff, security personnel and family members.

Committee recorded the statement of Justice Yashwant Verma

Members of the committee met Justice Yashwant Verma and also recorded his statement. An important responsibility before the committee was that he got a technical investigation of the 6 -month call data records of Justice Verma and his staff. The purpose of this was to know which people they have been interacting with. Financial transactions of Justice Verma and people close to him were also under investigation.