Think what will happen if a person files an appeal in the court in the name XXX? It may be that on the very first day, Judge Sir reprimanded the appeal court. But if a judge has done the same thing himself? Yes, such a surprising case has come to light, in this case, the High Court judge himself has filed a petition in the Supreme Court named XXX. Actually, these judges are Justice Yashwant Verma, who are facing a proposal in the case of cash sack found at their residence. In such a situation, there is also a question whether a common man can also file a petition in this way?

When and why the name of this method is used

Justice Dipankar Dutta and Justice Augustine George Christ heard this petition by Justice Yashwant Verma. His name has been written in this petition. This method is used to hide the identity of female petitioners victims of sexual harassment or sexual assault in court records. It is also used to hide the identity of adolescents and minors in the controversies of married custody. Because the court says that they should not tell the name of the rape victim in the judgment.

What is in Justice Verma’s appeal?

Justice Verma, in a petition called XXX, appealed to declare the report of the Internal Investigation Committee invalid, in which he was found guilty for the recovery of cash. Justice Verma has also requested that Sanjeev Khanna’s recommendation of May 8 should also be canceled. In this, an appeal was made against him to start impeachment proceedings in Parliament.

Why petition filed as XXX

Justice Verma has filed a petition for approval not to reveal his identity. In this petition, he has said that if his petition is not approved, he may have to face irreparable losses. That is why he sought approval to register in the name XXX in his petition, so that his identity could be hidden.

ALSO READ: The world’s first lipstick was made of deer fat, this company presented in the market

The exercise to remove Justice Yashwant Verma from the post has intensified. More than 200 MPs have given notice to remove them. It includes MPs of many parties. On July 21, on the first day of the monsoon session, notice of impeachment against him in both houses of Parliament was handed over to the presiding officers. The Lok Sabha Speaker can also announce a committee regarding this. There will be three members in the committee who will investigate in the case of Justice Yashwant Verma. In this, a judge of the Supreme Court, a Chief Justice of the High Court will be a reputed jurist. Let us know that even before Justice Yashwant Verma, there are many judges against whom impeachment was brought, but till now no judge has been removed from the post through impeachment, let’s know about them.

Justice V. Ramaswamy (1993): Supreme Court judge V. Ramaswamy was accused of financial irregularities. The impeachment motion was passed in the Rajya Sabha, but the proposal fell in the Lok Sabha. He is considered the first judge to face impeachment

Justice Saumitra Sen (2011): Calcutta High Court judge Justice Soumitra Sen passed an impeachment motion in the Rajya Sabha after allegations of misuse of money, but resigned before the matter was considered in the Lok Sabha.

Justice S.K. Gangele (2015): A impeachment motion was brought against allegations of sexual harassment on Justice SK Gangele, Judge of Madhya Pradesh High Court. An inquiry committee was constituted but he was convicted.

Justice JB Pardiwala (2015): A impeachment motion was also brought against the Gujarat High Court judge Justice JB Pardiwala. They were given impeachment notice for objectionable remarks on reservation, but the judge took the disputed remarks and the process stopped.

Justice CV Nagarjuna Reddy (2017): A impeachment motion was brought in the Rajya Sabha against Justice CV Nagarjan Reddy, a judge of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana High Court, but it did not proceed due to some MPs withdrawing their signature.

Justice Deepak Mishra (2018): A impeachment motion was brought against former CJI Deepak Mishra of the Supreme Court, but it did not pass in Parliament. The Rajya Sabha Chairman rejected the proposal in the first phase.

What is the whole matter?
Please tell that on the night of 14 March 2025, there was a fire at Justice Verma’s government residence in Delhi. The personnel of the fire department, which were caught to extinguish the fire, were recovered from their house. However, many notes were also burnt in the fire. A video of the incident was also revealed in which bundles of notes were seen in the store room of the house. At that time Justice Yashwant Verma was a Justice of the Delhi High Court, later he was transferred to the Allahabad High Court.

Also read: Dhankhar became the third Vice President to leave the post before the term ends, know when and when it happened

Justice Yashwant Verma has reprimanded the petitioner who reached the Supreme Court seeking to register an FIR in the cash case. The petitioner repeatedly called Justice Yashwant Verma as ‘Verma’. Annoyed by this, Chief Justice BR Gavai said, ‘He is not your friend. Do not forget that he is still an honorable judge of the High Court. His name cannot be taken in this way.

Advocate Mathews Nedumpra had earlier filed a petition for an FIR against Justice Verma 2 times. For the first time, the Supreme Court said that the Chief Justice has formed an in -house committee of 3 judges for investigation. Then for the second time he said that the report of the committee has been sent to the President and the Prime Minister.

Request for early hearing from Chief Justice BR Gawai

Nedumpra, who reached the Supreme Court for the third time, requested Chief Justice BR Gavai to hear soon. Nedumpra said, ‘Verma himself has created such a situation that FIR is necessary.’ Chief Justice BR Gawai was enraged at this.

He said, ‘How are you addressing them? He is still Justice Verma. On this, Nedumpra said that in his eyes, Justice Verma is not worthy of such respect. The Chief Justice refused to put the case immediately and said, “Do not teach the court right and wrong.”

Petition filed in Supreme Court

Let us know that last week, Justice Yashwant Verma has approached the Supreme Court and filed a petition against the committee’s decision. In the petition, Justice Verma has said that the committee did not give him a proper opportunity to present his case. Worked on the basis of predetermined thinking and gave his conclusion. There was a need to investigate whose cash it was? But instead of conducting proper investigation, the committee asked him to prove that the cash is not their.

Justice yashwant varma impeachment: In the Rajya Sabha, notice of impeachment motion against Justice Yashwant Verma has been given. Congress MP and whip Nasir Hussain gave this information. This proposal has been signed by more than 60 Rajya Sabha MPs. Earlier, 145 members of the Lok Sabha submitted a memorandum to the Lok Sabha Speaker. It demanded the removal of Justice Verma from the post.

MPs of many parties expressed support
Under Article 124, Article 217 and 218 of the Constitution, MPs of several parties including Congress, Telugu Desam Party, Janata Dal United, Janata Dal Secular, Janasena Party, Assam Gan Parishad, Shiv Sena (Eknath Shinde), Lok Janshakti Party and Indian Communist Party-M signed a memorandum related to impelies. The names of several senior leaders like Anurag Thakur, Ravi Shankar Prasad, Rahul Gandhi, Rajiv Pratap Rudi, PP Chaudhary, Supriya Sule and KC Venugopal are also among the signatures.

Burned notes were received on March 15
Justice Yashwant Verma’s government residence in Delhi is accused of getting a huge amount of cash notes on 15 March 2025. The matter became serious after this allegation surfaced. Now Parliament will investigate this matter. As part of the impeachment process, the investigation of the allegations will be started and it will be decided whether action should be taken to remove Justice Verma from the post.

Necessary support to present impeachment motion in Lok Sabha
Earlier, Union Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju had informed on Sunday that more than 100 MPs have signed the impeachment motion related to the removal of Justice Yashwant Verma in Parliament. Thus, necessary support has been received to present the proposal in the Lok Sabha. After the all -party meeting in Delhi on Sunday, Rijiju said, “The signature process is still going on, and more than 100 MPs have already signed it.” He also informed that when the impeachment motion will be introduced in Parliament, the work was held by the work advisory committee (BAC).

Kiren rijiju on kapil sibbal: Union Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju called him a “average lawyer”, calling him a scathing attack on senior advocate and Rajya Sabha MP Kapil Sibal and said that he could not impose his personal agenda on Parliament. Rijiju’s statement came when Kapil Sibal said that the opposition should not support any impeachment motion against Justice Yashwant Verma until the process of impeachment begins to investigate the alleged communal comment of Justice Shekhar Yadav.

Sibal is an average lawyer – Rijiju
Rijiju described Kapil Sibal as a very average lawyer and said that he considers himself a person to light up every subject, but it is not so. He said that many MPs have more understanding and knowledge than him.

Parliament belongs to everyone, not any one
The Union Minister said that Parliament runs through collective participation of all members and not with the intentions of any one lawyer-Sansad. We are working in the interest of the country, not to run someone’s agenda.

Parliament only right to remove judges
Rijiju also clarified that Parliament is the only platform to remove a judge of the Supreme Court or High Court. He said that no other institution can do this because Parliament is the highest elected institution of the country.

Government reversed Sibal’s allegations
Kapil Sibal has accused the government of saving Justice Shekhar Yadav and said that the petition filed by opposition MPs against him is pending since December 2024. Reacting to this, Rijiju said that Sibal’s behavior is biased and personal.

Justice Yashwant Verma Cash Case: The Delhi High Court Judge Cash scandal has taken a significant turn. Supreme Court Chief Justice Sanjeev Khanna has sent the report of the 3 -member in House Committee to the President and the Prime Minister to investigate the case. The judge Justice Yashwant Verma is accused of keeping illegal cash, the Chief Justice has also sent his reply to the President and the Prime Minister. The Chief Justice has taken this step after discussing with all the judges of the Supreme Court.

In the opinion of experts, it seems to be the first step of starting the process of impeachment in Parliament to remove Justice Verma from the post. It had already come into the discussion that the investigation committee has confirmed the burning of cash at the judge’s house and later removed from there.

Justice Verma refuses to resign

After receiving this report on 4 May, the Chief Justice asked Justice Yashwant Verma to reply in 2 days. Justice Verma was asked to consider resigning. The way the President and the Prime Minister have been made aware of the matter by the Chief Justice, it is clear that Justice Verma has refused to resign.

On the night of 14 March, there was a fire at the official residence of Justice Verma, who has been transferred from the Delhi High Court. After this, a large amount of burnt cash was allegedly found there. Taking complete transparency in the case, Supreme Court Chief Justice Sanjeev Khanna made all the available facts including the video of the incident public.

The investigation committee of 3 judges was formed

On March 22, Chief Justice Khanna constituted the investigation committee of 3 judges to further investigate the case. Members of this committee were- Chief Justice Sheel Nagu of Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chief Justice of Himachal Pradesh High Court GS Sandhavalia and Karnataka High Court Judge Anu Shivraman.

As soon as he started the investigation on March 25, the committee visited 30 Tughlaq Crescent i.e. Justice Verma’s government bungalow. The three judges inspected the room where there was a fire. The committee also conducted videography of the scene. The Investigation Committee spoke to the Delhi Police Commissioner, the head of the Delhi Fire Department and the policemen present at the scene, the fire department. The committee also talked to Justice Verma’s staff, security personnel and family members.

Committee recorded the statement of Justice Yashwant Verma

Members of the committee met Justice Yashwant Verma and also recorded his statement. An important responsibility before the committee was that he got a technical investigation of the 6 -month call data records of Justice Verma and his staff. The purpose of this was to know which people they have been interacting with. Financial transactions of Justice Verma and people close to him were also under investigation.

Justice Yashwant Varma Cash Row: A team of Delhi Police reached the residence of High Court Justice Yashwant Verma on Wednesday (March 26). According to news agency PTI, official sources said that the team led by Deputy Commissioner of Police (New Delhi) visited Justice Verma’s residence in connection with the investigation of alleged seizures of cash.

DCP of Delhi Police New Delhi Devesh Kumar Mahala was present at the residence of Justice Yashwant Verma for about an hour. Sources said that Justice Verma’s store room and surrounding space have been sealed, burnt cash was found here.

According to sources, some High Court officials also reached Justice Verma’s residence. Before reaching the team’s residence, police sources said that the team will inspect the place where there was a fire and can interrogate the employees working in Justice’s residence.

#Watch New Delhi DCP Devesh Kumar Mahla Leaves from the Residence of Delhi High Court Judge Justice Yashwant varma. pic.twitter.com/qlylyzijhq

– ANI (@ani) March 26, 2025

On 22 March, the CJI formed a three-member committee to investigate the allegations in-house. Also, it was decided to upload the investigation report of Chief Justice of Delhi High Court DK Upadhyay on the Supreme Court website.

Video and photos released

This report included alleged pictures and videos of heavy stores of cash. Justice Verma claimed a conspiracy regarding cash and said that these rupees are not from him or family. He said, “No member of his family had ever kept any cash in the storeroom.”

How did the matter be revealed?

A fire broke out in a room in the official residence of Justice Yashwant Verma on 14 March in the posh Lutyens area of ​​Delhi. While extinguishing it, fire personnel and policemen allegedly recovered cash. There was a ruckus after this news came in the media. It has been written in the official dialogue regarding the incident that “four to five half -borings” of notes were found.

‘Because of offering Namaz on the road …’, BJP MLA Karnail Singh wrote a letter to Delhi Police Commissioner