Jan Suraj Party founder Prashant Kishore has announced that he will contest from Karghar assembly seat of Rohtas. This was announced by Prashant Kishore in a digital channel’s Conclave on Wednesday (September 03, 2025). Santosh Mishra is currently an MLA from Congress from this seat. 2Talking about the election of 020, Vasistha Singh of Nitish Kumar’s party JDU was second from here.

Prashant Kishore said that anyone should fight his birthplace or karmabhoomi. However, he also said that Nitish Kumar does not contest elections, if he fights, he would also fight from the same seat.

Prashant Kishore said that he said about Tejashwi Yadav that he will fight Raghopur, and from where he will fight. On the other hand, PK also clearly said that the party will decide on contesting himself. PK also said that if he does not fight Karghar, he will fight Raghopur.

Understand the caste equation of Karghar (almost)

• Kurmi- 40,000
• Ravidas- 32,000
• Brahmin- 30,000
• Vaishya- 20,000
• Kushwaha- 20,000
• Yadav- 30,000
• Rajput- 15,000
• Nonia- 12,000
• Paswan- 14,000
• Bhumihar- 8,000
• Other- 18,000

Overall, this equation plays a decisive role in Karghar’s politics. Especially Kurmi, Ravidas and Brahmin votes are the largest number, while Vaishya, Kushwaha and Yadav also have a strong position. According to political experts, the Karghar assembly seat is a Brahmin dominated seat. This is the reason that last time Santosh Mishra won from this seat. Now Prashant Kishore has increased the tension of the current MLA by announcing to contest from here.

JDU told Jan Suraj Votekatwa Party

On the other hand, JDU National General Secretary Manish Verma in Sitamarhi, Bihar said on Wednesday (September 03, 2025), “Jan Suraj is a votecutwa party. They are not getting a seat, share the cards as much as you have to distribute. The people are confusing people by distributing the profit cards. People will throw this profit card in the drain.”

ALSO READ- ‘Modi ji is a girlfriend of 550 million …’, Tejashwi Yadav attacked Prime Minister on abusive dispute