Karnataka High Court has put an interim stay on the government’s order regarding Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) in the state. The High Court on Tuesday (October 28, 2025) has given a big decision regarding the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS). Along with this, the High Court has also issued a notice to the state government. In fact, the Karnataka government had ordered to ban the activities of Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) in the state and make it mandatory to take prior permission for gathering of more than 10 people in public places, on which the High Court has now given a major decision. This decision of the High Court is a big blow to the government led by CM Siddaramaiah.

This decision of the state government was challenged in the Karnataka High Court and it was alleged that it was against the fundamental rights of the citizens. Hubli based Punashchitna Seva Sanstha had filed a petition in the High Court. At the same time, the Karnataka government led by Chief Minister Siddaramaiah has announced to challenge this decision of the High Court. Chief Minister Siddaramaiah said that the state government will file an appeal in the division bench of the High Court against the interim order of the Dharwad bench.

Petitioner’s lawyer argued in court

A single bench of Justice Nagaprasanna has issued an order to put an interim stay on this order of the government and said that the next hearing in this case will be on November 17, 2025. On behalf of the petitioner, senior advocate Ashok Harnahalli argued in the court, ‘The government has ordered that permission will have to be taken for any gathering of more than 10 people. This is a restriction on the fundamental rights given by the Constitution. Even if a party is held in a park, that too will be considered an illegal gathering as per the government orders.

Government order was issued in the beginning of this month

This government order, which was postponed by the Karnataka High Court, was issued earlier this month. In the order issued by the state government, guidelines were given that no private or social organization can organize any program, meeting or cultural event in government or public properties like government schools, college grounds or other institutional premises without written permission.

In this order, the district administration was also directed to ensure that the rules are strictly followed and in case of any violation, action should be taken under the Karnataka Land Revenue Act and Education Act.

Also read: Fear of Cyclonic Storm Montha! Visakhapatnam airport closed, many flights and trains canceled

The Karnataka High Court on Thursday (September 25, 2025) refused to stay the prevailing social and educational survey being held in the state in the name of caste-based survey. The central government had argued in the Karnataka High Court that this is a census being done under the guise of the survey and it is interfered with its jurisdiction.

The bench of Karnataka High Court Chief Justice Vibhu Bakhru and Justice CM Joshi, while hearing several petitions questioning the validity of the survey, gave an interim order not to stop. However, the court directed the State Backward Classes Commission to maintain the confidentiality of the data collected and ensure voluntary participation.

The Karnataka High Court said in its order, ‘We do not find it right to stop the survey released. However, the data collected in the survey should be kept confidential. He should not be disclosed to any person. The Backward Classes Commission will have to ensure that the information is completely safe and kept confidential.

The court has asked the Backward Classes Commission to issue a notification, which has been clarified that participation is voluntary. The court said that the calculations will have to inform the citizens in the beginning that they are not obliged to give information.

The order states, “If a person refuses to participate, the calculator will not try to convince him or pressurize him.” The petitions argued that this process is primarily a census and a violation of privacy. Advocate General Shashi Kiran Shetty, who appeared on behalf of the state, assured the court that there is adequate security measures and he offered to submit an affidavit on the matter.

On behalf of the state government, Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi appeared and Senior Advocate Ravi Verma Kumar advocated for the Backward Classes Commission. The court allowed all the parties to present additional written arguments in the coming weeks. The court has fixed December 2 for the next hearing on the matter.

The petitioners include KN Subba Reddy, members of the State Vokkaliga Union, Vokkaliga community such as former Chairman of Bangalore Advocates Association, members of the Lingayat community and Akhil Karnataka Brahmin Mahasabha.

The Karnataka High Court on Thursday (September 25, 2025) refused to stay the social and educational survey prevalent in the name of a caste -based survey. Instructing the state government to maintain the confidentiality of the data, the court also said that the survey should be voluntary. A division bench of Chief Justice Vibhu Bakhru and Justice CM Joshi said that they do not see any reason to stop the survey.

What did the bench say?
The bench said, ‘We make it clear that the data collected will not be disclosed to anyone. The Karnataka State Backward Classes Commission (KSCBC) will ensure that the figures are completely safe and confidential. The judges also directed KSCBC to issue public notification that the survey is voluntary and no one can be forced to give any information. The court said that those who calculate this thing will also have to tell the public.

Opposition to ethnic census
Significantly, the caste census being done by the Karnataka government is being opposed and it is being alleged that it can be taken political advantage. Earlier this week, the state government defended the survey and said that the central government is adopting a double attitude in this matter. The survey, which started from 22 September, will run till October 7. Due to the problems of server and network, employees had a problem with the first two days.

Abhishek Manu Singhvi gave this argument
Senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for the state, argued that the Center had amended the 105th constitution in 2021, under which the states got the right to identify and list the backward classes. Singhvi said in the court that now the Center is now supporting the petitioners because there is a government of the opposition party in the state.

Social Media Platform X (First Twitter) The Karnataka High Court has suffered a shock. Central government Techdown Order Challenging X The court dismissed the petition on Wednesday (24 September 2025). Court two Dumb Where Social Media Platforms To work in India, one has to follow the laws here.

The company reached the company on Techdown order of X

The central government had instructed X to block some accounts and posts in the past, but the Elon Musk Company had challenged the Karnataka High Court. On behalf of X, it was said in the court that he works under American laws and has the right to freedom of expression. He said that for this reason there is no need to follow the Techdown orders of the Government of India.

In response to this, it was said by the government that Article 19(2) Only guarantees freedom of expression for Indian citizens and not foreign companies or non-citizens. It was said by the center that Social Media Platform Will have to follow the laws and rules of the country.

‘Can not be allowed to work without control’

Karnataka High Court said that in today’s time Social Media Regulation Need and companies cannot be allowed to work without control. A bench of Justice M. Nagprasanna gave the verdict, saying, “Information and communication have never been left without regulation. As the technology has progressed, control and regulations have also come into force.”

The court said, “Any citizen who wants judicial protection should be a citizen of the nation. The cooperation portal is a symbol of cooperation between citizens and intermediate, so there is no justification for this challenge. Social The media cannot be left in chaotic independence. every Sovereign Nation Social Controls media. Any platform to the Indian market Just Can’t operate as a playground. “

Former Chief Justice of India Dhananjay Yashwant Chandrachud has made a shocking disclosure by sharing his experiences as a CJI. He said that once a judge of the Karnataka High Court had called the Muslim dominated area as Pakistan, I did not like this.

DY Chandrachud told that he himself took cognizance and saw this matter. He has revealed this in an interview to The Lalantop. Chandrachud said, “As far as I remember. A case related to the Motor Vehicles Act was being heard in the Karnataka High Court. During this time a judge said,” The place that is ahead of this bridge is Pakistan. ” I saw a video related to this.

‘Judge’s decisions affect society’

DVI Chandrachud further said, “After the report came out, it was found that the judge had said this. I gave a small decision that no judge should say this. What you say or what you should have a dignity while giving the verdict. It affects the society.”

What did DY Chandrachud say on Justice Yashwant Verma?

During this time, he was also asked about the money received from Allahabad High Court judge Justice Yashwant Verma’s residence in Delhi. On this, he said that there should have been an FIR in this matter. However, he also questioned whether he had money or met his house? They should be given a chance to hear. He said, “Did his money be found in his house? Let’s not decide on this issue before giving the judge a full hearing opportunity.”

Should there have been an FIR file against Judge Yashwant Verma? On this, former CJI Chandrachud said that Zee is absolutely right that the FIR should be filed. The Vice President of that time, he commented a couple of times. Work should have been allowed, because if people come to the high constitutional post, then there should be some restraint on what you comment.

Also read

‘India has a weak Prime Minister’, Trump changes the H-1B visa rules and the first reaction of Rahul Gandhi

A23, an online gaming company in India, has knocked on the Karnataka High Court on Thursday (August 28, 2025) challenging the ban on the Modi government’s online-based sports. After signing on behalf of President Draupadi Murmu, this first petition has been filed in the court against this law. Since the enactment of this law, popular competitions of many online gaming platforms suddenly stopped and the future of the online gaming industry also became uncertain.

Real-money online gaming business was shocked when Parliament passed the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill, 2025. Under this bill, all types of money-based online games have been banned. On the other hand, e-spormers and online social games have been promoted.

After getting approval from President Draupadi Murmu, this bill has now become a law. The purpose of which is to curb cases of increasing drugs, money laundering and financial fraud through such apps.

Online gaming platforms closed real money games

After the passage of this bill from Parliament, online gaming platforms such as Dream 11, Mai 11 Circle, Vinjo, Jupi and Pokering of Darsara Technology have shut down their real money offer.

In Karnataka High Court A23 what did you say,

According to a report by Reuters, A23 is a gaming platform that provides online to sports like Rummi and Poker. In the petition filed in the Karnataka High Court, A23 said, “This law puts the legitimate business of playing online game based on skills in the category of crime. Many online gaming companies may have to stop overnight.”

A23 also said in its petition that the new law is the result of the mentality to be the state owner. This law has been applied to sports with skills like Rummi and Poker, which should be declared unconstitutional. However, the IT Ministry has not yet responded to the matter.

During an important hearing in the High Court on Wednesday (July 2, 2025) on the issue of ban on bike taxi in Karnataka, women passengers said that two -wheeler service is not only cheap and convenient, but is one of the safest travel options for them.

Acting Chief Justice V Kameshwar Rao and Justice CM Joshi were hearing the appeal filed by Ola, Uber and Rapido. In this, the April Judge’s order of April has been challenged, under which their operations were banned.

The earlier judgment said that in the absence of specific guidelines under Section 93 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, bike taxi aggregator ‘cannot legally provide bike taxi services in the state.

The court also decided that the transport department of the state could not be obliged to register motorcycles as transport vehicles or to issue contracted carriage permits.

On behalf of a female passenger requesting a party to be made in the case, Senior Advocate Jayana Kothari urged the court to consider the voice of women who depend on the bike taxi daily.

In response to court questions on security protocols in other states, Kothari cited other measures including restrictions in West Bengal and efforts to encourage women bike taxi drivers as well as background investigation of riders. He argued that these regulatory steps make the service more secure and inclusive.

Citing the policy of Rajasthan, he said that police verification of drivers is mandatory and there is a ban on running vehicles of minors. Senior Advocate Uday Hola, who is representing Uber, also spoke in favor of lifting the ban. He said that states like Tamil Nadu and Kerala had earlier banned bike taxis, but now they have amended their policies and allowed them.

Citing limited metro coverage of Bengaluru, Hola emphasized the importance of two -wheeler service for connectivity till the last destination. He argued, ‘Look at the metro system here. There are only two lines here. Even with more lines, they will not cover the entire city. Hola cited a recent figure, showing that there was an increase of 18 percent in traffic jams in Bengaluru after the ban on bike taxi.

RCB Stampede Case: 11 people were killed in the Bengaluru stampede case. An FIR was lodged against the Royal Challengers Bangalore team, but recently the RCB team knocked on the Karnataka High Court, in which Royal Challengers Sports Limited, a company owned by Bangalore franchise, filed a petition that the FIR should be canceled against him. Now the High Court has postponed the hearing on this petition till Wednesday.

Justice SR Krishna Kumar has also postponed the hearing on the plea of ​​Royal Challengers Sports Limited as well as DNA Entertainment Networks Private Limited. The court did this because the state government (Karnataka) could get time to register an objection to the petitions.

The High Court highlighted an agreement between the state government and the lawyers of both companies (RCB and DNA) that Karnataka Police could not arrest Royal Challengers Sports Limited and any officer of DNA Network Limited Company by the coming Wednesday. At the same time, till Wednesday, officials of both companies cannot leave the country and go out.

RCB officer arrested

In this case, RCB’s marketing head Nikhil Sosale and Sunil Matthew, Vice-President of DNA network, were arrested on 6 June. The Karnataka High Court has postponed the hearing on the bell petition of both of them till Tuesday. Please tell that Nikhil and Sunil were arrested after the FIR lodged at Kabban Park police station on 3 June.

The name of the DNA Network Company is related to this case, as the RCB team was to have a Victory Celebration at M Chinnaswamy Stadium. This event was organized by this company. At the same time, the police say that without permission from the Bengaluru police, the invitation was sent to the fans for the Victory Parade on social media.

Also read:

Rohit Sharma’s ODI retirement! BCCI did not think that something like this would happen; Surprising revelation

Chinnaswamy stadium crowd tragedy: Royal Challengers Bangalore (RCB )’s IPL victory at M. Chinnaswamy Stadium in Bengaluru (June 4, 2025) turned into mourning when 11 people died and more than 47 people were injured in stampede when there were more than 47 people. A emotional video has surfaced of BT Laxman, father of 21 -year -old Bhumik Laxman, who lost his life in this painful accident. In the video, he is seen crying bitterly by clinging to his son’s grave. This video is moistly moist by everyone’s eyes.

Bhoomi’s father looked broken in video

In the video, BT Laxman is seen badly broken. They are saying, “What happened to my son is not with anyone else. Now I do not want to go anywhere, I want to be here with him.” They are trying to pick up two people, but they are unable to stop themselves and say, “No father has to see a day as I am watching.” Their pain and the sound of a broken heart is making everyone emotional.

The biggest sorrow of a father …

The land he bought for the future of his son,
Today he has buried his son in the same land.

Laxman, from Hassan district of Karnataka,
No longer ready to withdraw from his 20 -year -old son Bhumik’s grave –
Because his heart, his spirit… buried in the same soil… pic.twitter.com/32Wh4SRTAN

– Sunil Shukla (@Realsunilshukla) June 7, 2025

Bhoomik was a student of engineering

21 -year -old Bhoomik Laxman, who lost his life in the Bangalore stampede, was a last year student of Engineering and came with friends to be a part of the celebration outside the Chinnaswamy Stadium. The crowd suddenly became uncontrollable and he lost his life in the stampede. A total of 11 people, including a 14 -year -old girl, died in this accident.

Questions raised on administrative lapse

In fact, after the RCB’s IPL (IPL) victory on June 04, there was a celebration inside the M. Chinnaswamy Stadium, while outside people were putting their lives at risk to get a glimpse of their favorite cricketers. Questions arose that RCB celebrated the victory in a hurry, but the police and administration were not fully ready. The situation deteriorated so much that the Karnataka High Court had to intervene and the report of the accident has been summoned by June 10. Meanwhile, the BCCI has separated itself from this entire controversy.

Also read-

Compensation of 25 lakh instead of 10 lakhs, retired judges will investigate … updated in stampede outside Chinnaswamy Stadium so far

RCB Victory Parade Stampede: The Karnataka High Court has taken a big decision on Friday (June 06, 2025) in the case of stampede outside the Chinnaswamy Stadium in Bengaluru during the RCB Victory Parade. The court has stayed punitive action against the officials of the State Cricket Association.

The Karnataka High Court directed the police that no punitive action should be taken against the Karnataka State Cricket Association (KSCA) on the basis of an FIR lodged outside the M. Chinnaswamy Stadium during RCB’s Victory Parade on June 4. However, the court directed the KSCA Management Committee to cooperate in the investigation and not to go out of the jurisdiction of the court without permission.

Know what was the debate in the court?

The KSCA has said that it is illegal to register an FIR, as the police started investigation by registering an unnatural death report (UDR) on the stampede incident. Registering an FIR against KSCA is a serious failure of justice from the police, while the government itself described the stampede as an unexpected accident and unexpected act.

The KSCA petition claimed, “This incident was an accident caused by a sudden crowd and for this, no intention or purpose of the KSCA management committee can be told as the stadium’s gate and the crowd were managed by RCSPL and not by KSCA, who rented the stadium to organize RCB.”

KSCA claimed, “When the order of suspension of police officers clearly reflects the failure of the police department, the police cannot disturb it.”

What did the court order?

The order said, “They will not go out of the jurisdiction of the court. Under the interim system, the registry is directed to re -list the registry on June 16, without any prejudice, they are instructed to take any hasty action against R2, 3, 4. If they are arrested, if they are arrested, their constitutional rights will be affected. Will do. “

Also read: Bengaluru stampede case: Kohli’s ‘friend’ arrested… Is it only Nikhil to be real culprit! Know which sword hanging on