Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind President Maulana Arshad Madani has once again given a big statement regarding Al Falah University. Maulana Arshad Madani said that the action taken on Al-Falah University is not an attack on education, but a politics of intimidating Muslim institutions. He said that since independence, governments have been trying to weaken Muslims.

Maulana Arshad Madani, while addressing a program, said that Muslims can become mayors in big cities of America like New York and London, but in India, they cannot even become the chancellor of any university created by them. While giving this statement he also gave the example of Azam Khan.

The government attacks Muslims as if they are a threat to the country – Maulana Madani

#WATCH Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind President Maulana Arshad Madani says, “The world thinks that Muslims have become helpless, finished, and barren. I don’t believe so. Today, a Muslim Mamdani can become mayor of New York, a Khan can become mayor of London, whereas in India, no one can… pic.twitter.com/cyuQzgZmHL

— ANI (@ANI) November 22, 2025

He said, ‘Muslim has become disabled and is finished. A man can become mayor of New York. A Khan can become the Mayor of London, but no Muslim can become the Vice Chancellor of a University in India and even if he does, he will go to jail like Azam Khan. Like Iqbal, the children will be put in jail. Wherever there is an institution of Muslims, the government cracks down on it as if it is a threat to the country. Look at what is happening to Al-Falah today. He is lying in jail and no one knows how many years he spends inside the jail.

Government does not want to let Muslims raise their heads – Maulana Madani

Maulana Madani said, ‘After the independence of the country, the situation is such that the government does not want to allow Muslims to raise their heads. The government wants the ground to be taken out from under the feet of the Muslims and today we see that the ground has been taken out from under the feet.

Also read: ‘There will be a fight from the streets to the Parliament’, said Congress MP Tariq Anwar while raising questions on labor laws.

Lakshmi N Mittal, a big steel sector industrialist of Indian origin, has decided to leave Britain. He is among the richest industrialists of the United Kingdom and has decided to leave Britain because there the tax on the rich can be increased by up to 20 percent. The Labor Party led government may bring a proposal to increase taxes on the country’s super rich industrialists.

Lakshmi N Mittal is still living in Britain and is regularly included in the list of the richest people there. According to ‘The Sunday Times’, Lakshmi N Mittal is now considering going to Dubai. According to the report, Lakshmi N Mittal, founder of ‘ArcelorMittal Steelworks’, has an estimated wealth of 15.4 billion pounds in 2025 and is the eighth richest man in Britain.

‘The Sunday Times’, citing sources close to Lakshmi N Mittal, claimed that he has become the latest billionaire to leave Britain ahead of the much-awaited budget to be presented by Chancellor Rachel Reeves on Wednesday (November 26, 2025).

According to the report, in this proposal presented by Chancellor Rachel Reeves, tax on the rich can be increased by 20 percent. The newspaper claimed that Lakshmi N Mittal already owns a mansion in Dubai and has now bought large tracts of land in a lucrative development project on the nearby Nea Island in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Lakshmi N Mittal was born in Rajasthan, but her family shifted to London in 1995. He has many luxurious houses in Kensington Palace Gardens, which also includes ‘Taj Mittal’ made of marble.

Before Lakshmi N Mittal, tech entrepreneur Harman Narula and Revolt co-founder Nick Storonsky have also shifted to UAE to avoid taxes. Experts say that this decision of the Labor government can also affect the investment of industrialists in the UK. He says that this is a matter of great concern for the industrialists who have created wealth here through hard work. Lakshmi N Mittal owns a 38 per cent stake in ArcelorMittal, worth £23.35 billion, and is also a long-time major donor to the Labor Party.

A new global ranking of the world’s best cities has been released and this time too London has secured the first position. In this list prepared by Resonance Consultancy and Ipsos, cities were evaluated on the basis of facilities like living, working and traveling. London being number-1 for the 11th consecutive time is proof that this city still remains the world’s favorite center in terms of culture, economy and standard of living.

This year too, the capital cities maintained their strong hold in the top ranking. The top 10 cities are as follows:

1. London
2. New York
3. Paris
4. Tokyo
5. Madrid
6. Singapore
7. Rome
8. Dubai
9. Berlin
10. Barcelona.

Cities have been evaluated on three main grounds. Among these criteria, stable economy, urban facilities, culture, employment and infrastructure were prominent.

Europe’s strong presence

This time Europe performed brilliantly in the rankings. Cities such as London, Paris, Madrid, Rome, Berlin and Barcelona reflect Europe’s advanced economies, historical heritage and high standards of living. Sustainability, tourism, education and modern facilities in these cities play a major role in the ranking.

Big cities of Asia also shine

Only two cities from Asia could make it to the top 10, in which Tokyo has got the fourth position, while Singapore is at sixth position. Both these cities are known worldwide for technology, cleanliness, safety and advanced urban systems. Tokyo’s high-tech infrastructure and Singapore’s smart city planning make them very strong at the global level.

Bengaluru leads in the performance of Indian cities

Four major cities of India have been included in this list. Bengaluru performed the best. Bengaluru has got 29th position. Whereas Mumbai and Delhi are at 40 and 54 positions respectively. Bengaluru is known as the Silicon Valley of India. It got a high rank due to its rapidly growing startup ecosystem, global tech companies, employment opportunities and better living facilities. Mumbai secured the 40th position due to economic activity and global connectivity, while Delhi remained in the top 60 due to culture, history and big markets.

Also read: Pakistan Earthquake: Earthquake tremors felt in Pakistan, people woke up from sleep and ran out of their homes.

These days a strange pattern of theft is visible in London and people are surprised by the choice of thieves. Here such incidents have happened one after the other, which show that thieves are very fond of iPhones. Even if they steal a Samsung phone, they return it. Many people have shared such incidents that happened with them, when thieves came back and returned their Android phones to them. Let us know about this strange case.

People shared these incidents

According to reports, Sam, a 32-year-old London resident, said that 8 people surrounded him in South London. These people beat up Sam and took away his phone, camera and other things. As these people were running away, one of them came back and gave Sam’s Android phone and said, ‘Don’t want, no Samsung’. Sam was surprised by this.

Another person named Mark has also shared a similar incident. Mark told that the thief who came on an e-bike stole his Samsung phone and ran away. He chased the thief for some distance, but later stopped. After walking a little further, the thief gently left the phone on the ground and went away. There was no damage to this phone. People have shared such incidents of Android phones not being stolen.

Why do thieves want to steal iPhone?

According to media reports, cyber security experts say that thieves get higher resale value on iPhones. Thieves are concerned with this value. Now like iPhone, Android has also started getting strong security, so it is difficult for thieves to unlock both. They only care about which phone they will get more money for. On the other hand, the police say that they do not have the data as to which phones are being stolen more, but they are trying to catch the thieves.

Read this also-

Two accounts will run on one device, WhatsApp is bringing special features for these users, know how it will work

Well-known Hindi scholar Francesca Orsini of London was stopped from coming to India on Monday (20 October 2025) night. Despite having a valid five-year e-visa, he was not allowed to enter Delhi’s Indira Gandhi International Airport. According to sources, the government said that Francesca Orsini had come to India on a tourist visa, but she violated the conditions of the visa.

Francesca Orsini is blacklisted: sources

According to government sources, Francesca Orsini has been blacklisted from March 2025 due to violation of visa rules. It is a normal procedure that if a person violates the conditions of the visa then he can be blacklisted.

TMC targets central government

TMC MP Sagarika Ghosh has targeted the central government regarding this matter. He posted on X and described this incident as sad and shocking. He wrote, Francesca Orsini is a scholar of South Asian literature and Hindi. Despite having a valid visa, he has been deported. The narrow-minded and backward-thinking Narendra Modi government is destroying the open-minded excellence that India has always stood for.

Francesca Orsini has studied from JNU

Francesca Orsini is a renowned scholar and professor of Hindi at the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS), London. He obtained his graduation degree in Hindi from Venice University, Italy. He did further studies in India at the Central Institute of Hindi and Jawaharlal Nehru University.

Francesca Orsini received her doctorate from SOAS, London. Presently she is working as a Professor of Hindi and South Asian Literature in the School of Culture and Linguistics. Francesca Orsini has also taught at Cambridge University. There is a debate on social media about his deportation.

Also read: May the seat sharing dispute sink the Grand Alliance? Tejashwi himself is getting trapped in the process of cornering NDA, understand in 5 points

Virat Kohli In IND vs AUS: Virat Kohli has returned to international cricket after seven months. Virat was out on zero (0) in the first ODI against Australia. Kohli was living away from his country in London for a long time. Along with Virat, his wife Anushka Sharma and children Vamika and Akay also went to live in London. Virat has retired from Test and T20 International cricket, hence now he is rarely seen playing matches. During the conversation on Australia tour, Kohli has told about the reason for his going to London.

Why did Virat Kohli go to London?

Virat Kohli is a public figure, but he has been living abroad with his family for a long time. After Royal Challengers Bangalore won the title in IPL, Virat Kohli went to England with wife Anushka Sharma. In an interview given to commentators Adam Gilchrist and Ravi Shastri during the Australia tour, Virat Kohli said that after his retirement from Test cricket, he got a chance to spend time with his family and was able to spend time in his personal life as well. Virat also said that he had not been able to take a complete break while playing cricket in the last 15 years.

While talking on Fox Cricket, India’s star player Virat Kohli said, ‘Yes, it has been a long time since I retired from Test cricket. I am now able to connect with my life, which I was not able to do for a long time. It is very beautiful to spend time at home with my children and family, which I am enjoying a lot.

Virat Kohli did not take ‘break’

Virat Kohli further said that to be honest, whatever cricket I have played in the last 15 to 20 years, I have hardly taken any break. If you look at international cricket and IPL combined, I would have played more matches in the last 15 years than any other player. That’s why coming back now is very refreshing for me.

Read also

IND vs AUS: Eyes will be on the performance of these 5 players in the first ODI between India and Australia, they alone can change the course of the match.

A big global movement has started in protest against the policies of US President Donald Trump. This campaign has been named ‘No Kings’, which means, we do not believe in any king. This movement has spread from America to Europe and Asia.

Hundreds of people gathered outside the US Embassy in London on Saturday (18 October 2025) against the policies of the Trump administration. The protesters said that they are standing in protest against the President’s increasing dictatorial behavior and the threat to democratic institutions.

Protest started from London, impact spread to the world

This rally in London is being considered as the first phase of the No Kings campaign. With this, more than 2,600 demonstrations have been organized across the world. Even in Spanish cities like Madrid and Barcelona, ​​people took to the streets and protested. In America, thousands of people in New York, Washington and Chicago expressed their displeasure over the policies of the Trump administration.

People said – ‘Democracy is not anyone’s personal empire’

Leah Greenberg, co-founder of Indivisible, an organization associated with the campaign, said that this demonstration is to protect democracy. He said that the idea that we do not have kings is the soul of the American Constitution. This movement gives the message that citizens will have to raise their voice again.

Increased commotion and security in America

Protestors marched peacefully in many parts of America. Hundreds of people in Virginia headed towards Washington DC and gathered near Arlington Cemetery. Organizers said that this campaign has received the support of more than 300 social organizations. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has also trained thousands of volunteers to ensure that the protests remain peaceful.

Leaders and celebrities gave support

America’s progressive leaders Bernie Sanders, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Hillary Clinton also supported the campaign. Many celebrities gave a message of unity on social media with the No Kings hashtag. A few months ago, similar protests took place on Trump’s birthday, in which lakhs of people participated.

Trump said – ‘I am not a king’

Trump responded to the protests by saying it was wrong to call him a king. He also said that these demonstrations are politically motivated and harm the image of the country. Republican Party leaders also criticized these protests, calling them anti-America campaigns.

People’s voice got a platform again

American sociologist Dana Fisher believes that the No Kings campaign could prove to be the largest mass movement in recent years. He says that this is not just a protest against Trump’s policies, but it is the voice of those who are feeling suppressed. According to Fischer, more than three million people can join this movement, which shows that the public will no longer remain silent.

Also read: Amid conflict with Pakistan, Taliban strengthened border security, made major changes in army and administration

Last week, Malaysian-Indian businessman Vinod Shekhar was attacked by two miscreants in South London. Vinod was returning to his daughter’s house after visiting with his wife and family when this incident happened. During the attack, his wife Winnie Yep bravely faced the attackers and forced them to flee.

Petra Group Chairman and CEO Vinod Shekhar narrated the entire incident on Facebook. He wrote that the day was very good with the family in Oxford. After watching the musical ‘Hamilton’ in the evening, he reached his daughter’s house near Battersea Power Station. Then suddenly two people appeared and attacked Vinod. He hit him on his thighs and chest and pulled the watch from his hand.

Couldn’t compete due to health issue
Vinod told that he could not compete properly due to his health and the medications he was taking after the transplant. He said that I tried, but due to the condition of my body I could not struggle for long. they wrote. The attackers broke the band of the watch, snatched it and tried to escape.

The miscreants ran away due to the bravery of the wife.
During this time his wife Winnie Yep came forward. She started shouting loudly, waving her bag and stood in front of the miscreants without any fear. Seeing his courage, both the attackers got scared and ran away on an electric bike. Vinod wrote, ‘My wife became a lioness like always and drove away the attackers.’

Police warned
Within a few minutes London Police reached the spot. A police officer told Vinod that he was lucky, because if he had protested he could have suffered serious injuries. After the incident, Vinod warned travelers not to go out on the roads wearing expensive watches or bags as safety is not always what it seems. He said, ‘Watch, purse or phone can be bought again, but life and your loved ones cannot.’ Vinod wrote at the end of his post, ‘Be careful, stay safe and be grateful for the things every day that no one can take away from you.’

Most Runs Off a Single Ball: India’s victory in the second test against West Indies seems certain. India has to score 121 runs to win. Till the fourth day of the second test, India has scored 63 runs at the loss of one wicket, now Team India needs only 58 runs to win on the last day. Now it is impossible for West Indies to win this match. If there is a miracle then it is a different matter, like it happened once in Australia when 286 runs were scored on one ball.

The report of this match was published in the London newspaper ‘Pal-Mal Gazette’ on 15 January 1894. The newspaper claimed that this unique incident had happened in the match played between Victoria and Scratch XI at Burnbury ground in Australia. In that match, 286 runs were scored on one ball, however, those who do not know about this match should be asked what is the maximum number of runs that can be scored on one ball. In response to this question, 99 percent people will say seven runs, but in the history of cricket, 286 runs have been scored on one ball.

What happened in that match?

The tree was within the boundary line: During the match, the Victoria batsman hit a powerful shot and the ball got stuck in the branches of a tree inside the boundary line.

Umpire’s decision: The Scratch XI team appealed to the umpire for ‘lost ball’, but the umpire rejected the appeal as the ball was clearly visible on the tree, hence the umpire ruled that the ball could not be declared lost.

Batsmen kept running: As long as the ball remained stuck on the tree, both the batsmen kept running continuously between the wickets. The fielding team had no way of getting the ball out, then the umpire called for an ax to cut the trees, but how could the trees be cut so quickly. Finally a gun was called to aim and try to make the ball fall from the tree. After several attempts the ball finally fell down.

Record breaking runs: By the time the ball reached the wicketkeeper’s hands, both the batsmen had scored 286 runs. It is said that both the players had run about 6 kilometers. Even today this incident is discussed, but it is not easy for anyone to believe it.

A London court will hear the petition of fugitive diamond businessman Nirav Modi on 23 November, requesting to reopen his extradition case. Nirav Modi has filed a petition on the basis that if he is brought back to India, various agencies can interrogate him. The agency can refute his claim by assuring that he will not be questioned.

Officials who have been aware of this development said that Nirav Modi has used all his legal appeals available to the level of the Supreme Court and this time he has approached the ‘Westminster’ court to reopen his extradition case.

Claim to torture in inquiry

She has argued that if she is extradited to India, various agencies will interrogate him, resulting in torture. The agency investigating the case can reiterate its old assurance before the court that Nirav Modi will be prosecuted according to Indian laws and she will not interrogate her if they are extradited.

An official who has knowledge regarding this case said, ‘We have already filed the charge sheet in the case. There is no need to question him right now. Our investigation is almost complete. He will have to face the trial. If the UK court tells us, we can repeat our assurance that no questioning will be done after being extradited to India. We have given such an assurance before.

Accused of rigging more than Rs 6,498 crore

Various agencies investigating cases against Modi are unanimous that there is no need to interrogate him. Nirav Modi is accused of manipulating more than Rs 6,498 crore through hundreds of promissory note issued through fraud from Punjab National Bank.

India has already told Britain that Nirav Modi will be placed in Barrack 12 of Arthur Road Jail in Mumbai, where there is no risk of any kind of violence, congestion or misconduct and where medical facilities are available. Various agency has assured Britain that Nirav Modi will be prosecuted according to Indian laws and no new allegations will be made on it.

Three types of criminal proceedings against Nirav Modi

54 -year -old diamond businessman Nirav Modi, who was once a bright star in the Indian jewelery industry, was arrested on the extradition warrant on March 19, 2019. The then British Home Minister Preeti Patel ordered her extradition in April 2021. He has been in a London jail for almost six years.

Nirav Modi is facing three types of criminal proceedings. The first is a case of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) related to fraud related to Punjab National Bank (PNB) and the second is a case of the Enforcement Directorate (ED) on the alleged treatment of fraud income. CBI proceedings are another case of criminal proceedings related to alleged intervention with evidence and witnesses.

Also read:- ‘Forget this, Rahul Gandhi …’, What bid on CJI Gawai’s bulldozer statement?