Congress National President Mallikarju Kharge has given a big statement regarding Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Friday (November 7, 2025). Kharge accused PM Modi of trying to implement Manusmriti in the country. With this he said that this will not be allowed to happen at all, even if lives are lost.

Mallikarjun Kharge was campaigning in Rohtas district for the second phase of Bihar Assembly elections. Addressing a public meeting in Chenari assembly constituency of Rohtas district of Bihar, Kharge said that Tejashwi Yadav was made the chief ministerial candidate by the Grand Alliance so that migration ends and unemployment reduces.

Congress President commented on Prime Minister Modi

Commenting on Prime Minister Modi, Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge said, ‘Modi ji said that Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) took the post of Chief Minister by placing a katta on his forehead. Whereas the truth is that these people are thieves and steal votes.

He further said, ‘Narendra Modi had said that I will send Rs 15-15 lakh to the account, will provide two crore jobs every year, will guarantee Minimum Support Price (MSP) for crops to the farmers, will build permanent houses for the poor and will give free gas cylinders to women. Made these promises, but actually did nothing on the ground. He alleged that Narendra Modi tells only lies.

Chief Minister Nitish Kumar could not stop migration even during 20 years of rule – Kharge

Mallikarjun Kharge said, ‘He (Narendra Modi) wants to run the society under Manu Smriti by keeping it in front. They want to bring back Manu Smriti which was burnt by Ambedkar. This will not work, even if we lose our lives. Every poor will live with self-respect.

He said that Nitish Kumar could not stop migration even after being the Chief Minister for 20 years. Kharge said, ‘If you have some shame then first stop migration and provide employment. We intend to make Tejashwi the Chief Minister so that migration can be stopped, unemployment can be reduced and prosperity can be brought in the villages.’ He claimed that women have no place in BJP and RSS.

Also read: ‘Lalu ji used to say that if we build a road then the police will come…’, JP Nadda taunts Tejashwi Yadav.

Karma: Sadhus and saints in India have always been the center of reverence and faith. The society not only considers him a religious guide, but also considers their conduct as the direction of life.

But when a person is involved in unrighteousness by wearing a monk’s clothes, it is not just a personal crime. This is a direct attack on religion, society and faith.

This is the biggest hypocrisy, because trust is exploited here. The scriptures have used harsh words for such hypocrites and have declared them Mahapatak.

Religion should be visible by conduct, not by being

Theology clearly says that the basis of religion is not just disguised. It is written in Manusmriti that Unrighteous Tu Ya: Sadhu Veshan Kritva Charedih. S Sarman Nihanatyashu Swargam Chav Na Gachhati. That is, a person who wears unrighteousness by wearing a monk, does not only become a sinner himself but also leads the whole society towards destruction.

Even in the peace festival of Mahabharata, this hypocrisy is considered a great sin. A person pretending to be a part of hell is a part of hell, because his conduct confuses others and corrupts faith.

Grooming depiction of Garuda Purana

In Garuda Purana, the most scary description on this subject is found. It is said here that the person who is wearing the dress of the monk is dropped directly into the Raurav hell after death.

In this hell, Yamdoots persecute him with fire flames and toxic insects. His soul does not find peace until the hypocrisy spread by it does not disappear from the society.

It is also said in the Padma Purana that such a person is repeatedly born in lowly vaginas and suffers endless sorrows. This punishment is not limited to the individual, but also has a side effect on his family and followers.

What happens when a person does unrighteousness by consisting of a monk?

When a person does unrighteousness by consisting of the monk, his effect is not only personal. This is a direct attack on faith. The society which considers the monk a symbol of religion is filled with doubt and mistrust.

The image of true sadhus also starts to fade and the reputation of religion is hurt. This is the reason that the scriptures have spoken of excluding such people from the society. Religion is not identified with prostitution, behavior is the proof of real religion.

What does hypocrisy get?

The scriptures do not only talk about the hereafter, they also indicate punishment in this world. A person who does hypocrisy has to face insults, diseases and mental tribulations in life itself.

His end is often tarnished and sad. His virtue in the form of divine punishment becomes weak and luck leaves him. He is excluded as a social punishment, and society stops believing his words. The scriptures have made it clear that such a hypocritical cannot live peacefully in both life and death.

What do those who do hypocrisy get?

On Mahabharata Veshane Tapasa Vapi Dharmam Yonntithi. S papado na skepto narakam yati durmati: This means that a person who follows religion only with dress and appearance is not real. Such a hypocrisy definitely becomes a part of hell.

This message was not only for that period, but is equally relevant today. When there is hypocrisy in the name of religion, then the society should remember this verse.

Who is the real saint?

Even today, we see many such faces who are involved in hypocrisy wearing a monk’s chola. Somewhere they claim to show miracles, somewhere they cheat people in the name of faith.

From the point of view of the scriptures, all this is extremely unrighteous. The value of faith is never decided by clothes. Seeing only the dress is the biggest mistake to consider someone as a saint. The real saint is the one whose behavior is clean, whose life is full of service and practice.

Carrying the monk and doing iniquity is the greatest sin!

The theology, memories and Puranas are unanimous on the subject that it is the greatest sin to make unrighteousness by taking disguise of the monk. Such a person ends with hell, humiliation and stigma. His life becomes a warning for society. The message of the scriptures is clear that behavior is religion, it is only a feeling.

Therefore, the society should not only be influenced by Chola, but tested the life and conduct of the monk. This is the way to protect faith and this is the real identity of religion.

Disclaimer: Here information provided here is based only on beliefs and information. It is important to mention here that Abplive.com does not confirm any kind of recognition, information. Before implementing any information or recognition, consult the concerned expert.

Indian Constitution vs Manusmriti: The issue of Constitution vs Manusmriti is once again gaining momentum, which started with the statement of RSS General Secretary Dattatreya Hosbale on the Constitution. Hosbale, in his statement, supported the removal of words like ‘Dharmaniparaksha’ and ‘Socialism’ from the Constitution. After this, Congress leader Rahul Gandhi attacked BJP and RSS strongly. He said, RSS and BJP do not want the constitution, they want to implement Manusmriti in the country. They want to snatch their rights from Bahujans and the poor.

Actually, debate on Manusmriti vs. Constitution in the country is not a new issue. It has been debated for decades and the RSS has also been accused of implementing Manusmriti. In such a situation, let us know what is Manusmriti? Who wrote it? And what are its things disputed?

Who wrote Manusmriti?

Manusmriti was written by Manu Rishi. According to mythology, Manu was the first person to come to this earth, so he has also been called Adipurush. According to beliefs, Manu composed Manusmriti several hundred years before Christ. In this book, social system, religion to human deeds, judicial system and rights of women have been talked about. There are 12 chapters and 2684 verses in Manusmriti. 2964 verses are also found in some of its versions. In the first chapter itself, the four varnas and their profession are told, which also mentions the greatness of Brahmins.

What are the dispute over?

There is a dispute over many things written in Manusmriti and from Mahatma Jyotiba Phule to the creator of Constitution, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar has also publicly challenged this book. Varna and ethnic system have also been discussed in Manusmriti, which is the reason for the biggest dispute. Apart from this, this book is also accused of limiting women’s rights. In this book, Brahmins have been described as the greatest on the basis of varna system, while the Shudras have also been denied the right to education, there is also a lot of controversy about it.

Also read: Ruckus over the words ‘socialism’ and ‘secular’ in the Constitution, know when the amendments in the Constitution of India

Delhi University has taken an important decision. Under this, no education will be taught in any syllabus. University Vice Chancellor Professor Yogesh Singh clarified that the ‘Dharmashastra Study’ syllabus of the Sanskrit department has been completely removed, in which Manusmriti was first included as recommended Reading Material.

Delhi University gave this information

In an official statement issued by the university administration, it was said that Manusmriti will not be studied in any course of Delhi University. The ‘theology Studies’ course of Sanskrit department, which was included in the recommended reading material, has been removed from the course list.

Student organizations opposed syllabus

This decision was taken when Manusmriti was included in a new Sanskrit course of graduation of the university. Many student organizations and teachers lodged a protest on this. Opponents said that Manusmriti has promoted varna system and anti-female ideas, which is unacceptable in today’s social environment.

Why did the university take this decision?

Following the demonstrations and memorandum of students and teachers amidst disputes, the university administration reconsidered it and decided to remove the controversial course material. The purpose of this step is to maintain an inclusive and progressive educational environment in the university campus.

This book will never be taught

The hope of teaching Manusmriti in Delhi University’s School of Open Learning (SOL) is now over. The university has ensured that this book will neither be taught nor recommended in any course in the coming time. This decision is being seen as a policy initiative, which has been raised towards giving priority to students’ diversity, social justice and egalitarian values. This decision of the university has been welcomed by many social organizations and teachers.

Also read: DU will explain the importance of relationships with ‘Kabir Singh’ and ‘Titanic’, students will read ‘Understanding close relationships’

Education loan information:
Calculate Education Loan Emi