The case of demolition of Ujjain Takiya Masjid has reached the Supreme Court. By filing a petition, the Madhya Pradesh High Court’s decision to uphold the demolition of Takiya Masjid has been challenged. The petition alleged that the Madhya Pradesh government demolished a 200-year-old mosque to increase the parking area for the Mahakal temple. The petitioners demand that a stay be imposed on Madhya Pradesh’s decision and that an impartial investigation be conducted into the demolition of the mosque.

According to the report of Bar and Bench, 13 people who offered namaz in the mosque have filed the petition. According to the petition, the mosque was duly notified as Waqf in the year 1985 and was being used as a mosque for 200 years, but in January it was declared illegal and arbitrarily demolished.

The petition said that the demolition is in violation of the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act 1991, the Waqf Act 1995 (now the Integrated Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency and Development Act 1995) and the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act 2013.

It has been claimed in the petition that there are irregularities in the land acquisition process done by the government before the demolition of the mosque. The petitioners allege that the Madhya Pradesh government has given compensation to unauthorized occupants and encroachers in the area to create a false case of acquisition.

The petitioners said that they had approached the Madhya Pradesh High Court to get the mosque rebuilt, but the petition was rejected there, after which they have approached the Supreme Court. The petitioners have urged the court that as an interim relief, the High Court order should be stayed for the time being so that the state government cannot do any further construction at that place. The petitioners have also demanded an impartial investigation into the demolition.

Hindu organizations have once again protested against the mosque in Sanjauli, Shimla. Last year, there was a big agitation against the Sanjauli Mosque on the same day, in which the police lathi -charged the protesters. This year too, people of Hindu organizations gathered outside the Sanjauli Mosque and shouted slogans against the government and the Waqf Board.

Protests through semi pindadan

This morning (September 11) at eleven o’clock, 11 people demonstrated outside the Sanjauli Mosque. Vijay Sharma, co -convenor of Dev Bhoomi Sangharsh Samiti, said that the administration was scared of last year’s agitation. This time only 11 people were allowed to sit citing the Disaster Act.

The protesters performed half pinddaan keeping in mind the halfway of the Sanjauli crematorium and the half -term of Sukhu government. He said that this semi -pindadan is like giving semi -liberation to Sanatan opponents.

Vijay Sharma said that despite the order of the Municipal Corporation Court, the Waqf Board has approached the court. He said that this is not correct. He insisted that Hindu society has united and the movement against Sanatan opponents will continue continuously.

Today only 11 people got permission to perform, but Sharma also said that the power of 11 people will be several times and the flag of Hindutva will be high.

Remember the incident last year’s incident

Last year, there was a movement against Sanjauli Mosque on 11 September 2024. During that time, the police lathi -charged Hindu organizations. This time, the protesters, remembering the same day, gathered to protest against the government and the Waqf Board.

The protesters allege that the administration and the government have failed to stop the mosque construction. He said that the mosque remains half incomplete and the administration has not been able to take any concrete steps till now.

Announcement to continue the movement

Vijay Sharma said that the movement is not over yet. Hindu organizations are united against the Sanjauli Mosque and the movement will continue even further. He believes that the sound of Hindutva is not elevated only by small performance, but this issue will be raised with full force.