America has appointed its new ambassador to India. President Donald Trump has entrusted this responsibility to his close aide Sergio Gore. The Government of India has welcomed this decision, although there has not been much response from India.

Foreign Minister S. When Jaishankar was asked about the new US ambassador in an event, he said that ‘I have read about it’. This announcement has been made about seven months after Trump became President. Experts believe that this is a positive sign for India and it makes it clear that America wants to further strengthen relations with India.

The appointment of Sergio Gore has not yet been approved by the Senate

The approval of the US Senate is yet to be received on the appointment of Sergio Gore. Although Gore is considered to be special of Trump, it is expected that they will open the way for open talks between the two countries. Direct discussion will be possible on important issues like trade, trump’s stance on Pakistan, immigration and India’s relations with Russia. According to reports, Trump may come to India for the Quad Summit in November. However, threats to impose additional tariffs on India can also cause sourness in relations.

Gore became special messengers of South and Central Asia

Sergio Gore has also been created for South and Central Asia. There have been some concerns on this that America may try to interfere more in India-Pakistan affairs. India has not given any major response to this issue. Foreign Minister Jaishankar avoided comment on this, while the rest of the officials are also waiting that more information came out about the role of Gore.

What are the pyre of India?

India’s biggest concern is that America keeps India and Pakistan equal. India says that by doing this, the difference between the attacker and the victim disappears. Especially in April, India has become more alert in this matter after the Pahalgam terror attack and then Operation Sindoor.

Trump’s arbitration claims and India’s response

Trump has claimed many times that he got a ceasefire between India and Pakistan. However, Prime Minister Narendra Modi clearly told Trump that there is no trade agreement or arbitration between Indo-US. Jaishankar also said that this agreement was made through direct talks between India and Pakistan.

What is India’s stance on mediation with Pakistan?

India has already opposed the US efforts to mediate on the Kashmir issue. In 2009, the Government of India forced the Obama administration to back down, when Richard Halbrook was made the messenger for the Af-Pak region. India does not want America to use Gore to impose such issues on it, which can be solved only by bilateral dialogue of India and Pakistan.

Jaishankar clearly said that for the last 50 years, India’s national consensus is that no arbitration will be accepted in its relations with Pakistan. India wants America to have good relations with it, but respect its boundaries and policies.

US President Donald Trump while speaking to the media in Scotland claimed that if he had not intervened in time, there would have been a war between India and Pakistan. Trump said that he had threatened both countries to stop trade talks, averting the war.

Stop six major war, ‘Hotspot’ told Indo-Pak relations
Trump said that he worked to stop six major wars in the world, including India-Pakistan. He described Indo-Pak as a “very big hotspot” because both are nuclear-rich countries. He said that he has good acquaintance from the leaders of India and Pakistan.

Condition of nuclear war and business
Trump told that when the tension between India and Pakistan increased, he said to both of them, ‘If you are going to fight, I will not compromise with you.’
Describing it as ‘madness’, he said that if nuclear weapons were used, many countries would have joined it and there would have been heavy destruction.

Avoiding war proud: Trump
He said that it may seem a bit selfish, but it is an honor for America to stop wars. He said this in the context of the Gaza struggle, where he put a ceasefire pressure on Israel.

India rejected Trump’s claim
India has clearly rejected Trump’s claim. India said that after the terrorist attack in Pahalgam on 22 April, the counter -military action was taken under ‘Operation Sindoor’, which lasted between 7 and 10 May.

India takes accurate action during Operation Sindoor
India carried out accurate airstrikes on 9 terrorist bases in Pakistan and its occupied Kashmir. More than 100 terrorists were killed in this. After this, military conflict between the two countries started on the border.

Straight without arbitration
India said that the ceasefire was not from any American mediation but after direct talks between the armies of the two countries. It has been repeatedly clarified by India that there was no mediator.

Congress MP Shashi Tharoor on Friday (May 23, 2025) targeted US President Donald Trump for taking a credit for a ceasefire between India and Pakistan. He said that in this case, no formal process of arbitration was made nor anything like this happened in this case.

Shashi Tharoor said that the government informed the global leaders about the action taken by India against Pakistan and the foreign ministers of many countries were also informed about this action.

‘No formal process of mediation took place’
The Congress MP said that you are very well aware of the attitude of our government. During any crisis, those countries are always contacted who call and contact. We have taken the same path everywhere. There has been no formal process of arbitration, nor was any request for this.

Tharoor’s stance on Trump’s claim
He said that if you call me, then I tell you what I am doing and why I am doing it. This has also happened in this way. If you want to go and tell this to someone else and they result in some special consequences as a result, is it called mediation? I do not think so.

Congress leader Shashi Tharoor said that if any crisis is going on, then we talk to any person in a very creative way. Whenever our Foreign Minister used to talk to another foreign minister, he used to tell it on his Twitter (X) account.

Significantly, the all -party delegation led by Congress MP Shashi Tharoor is going to America to highlight Pakistan -sponsored terrorism. These include TDP leader GM Harish Balayogi, BJP leader Shashank Mani Tripathi, Bhubaneswar Kalita, Shiv Sena leader Milind Deora, BJP MP Tejashwi Surya and former diplomat Taranjit Sandhu.

Also read:

NITI Aayog meeting will be held tomorrow under the chairmanship of PM Modi, know which issues will be discussed

Experts on india-pakistan relationship: After the conflict between India and Pakistan, ceasefire has been done. Now the opinion of experts has been revealed about this. They believe that India should not keep much focus on Pakistan. Instead, their focus should be on China.

According to Dr. Walter Ladwig, an international relationship expert at King’s College London, ‘America’s policy regarding India has been clear for years. It has to be developed as a strategic power in the Indo-Pacific region. This strategy is not only to balance China’s influence, but also to maintain regional stability. He said that India should not keep more focus on Pakistan. Instead, he should focus his focus on China, which is correct in terms of America.

Dr. Ladwig said that India’s 7% economic growth rate is promising for the US, but long -term stress with Pakistan can derail this development path of India. This is the reason that the US wants India to focus on the widespread strategic subjects of Asia instead of border controversies.

Sympathy with India over terrorism

After 26 people killed in Pahalgam terror attack, Western countries, Russia and even China showed solidarity against terrorism. Dr. Ladwig called it real sympathy and said that India’s military response was understood globally. He further said that like the 2019 Pulwama attack, this time India did not have to give dosier or additional evidence to raise support. The policy change shows that India is now in favor of direct and decisive action. This is an approach that was considered globally effective.

Indian Air Force influence in the world

Dr. Ladvig especially appreciated the Indian Air Force’s ability to carry out accurate attack. He said, “The Indian Air Force worked under Standard Military Protocols and met its military principles.” Dr. Ladvig also said that there was clarity in the plan of attack from India, which proved that the Indian Air Force is capable of attacking more widespread targets and carrying out more successful operations. This is the reason that India’s claims are being certified by visual and technical evidence, while Pakistan’s claims are limited to rhetoric only.

Why does America not want Indo-Pak struggle?

According to experts, ‘The conflict between India and Pakistan is contrary to American interests as it can not only stop India at the pace of development, but can also weaken India’s participation in the Indo-Pacific strategy. He says, “When it comes to America’s Indo-Pacific strategy, India’s role is important as a ballncer, especially in the context of China’s growing influence.”