Five Lowest Team Score In Test Cricket History: The format of Test cricket is completely different from T20 and ODI and that is why the batsmen do not show any haste here. First he settles down and then plays big shots. This is why teams make big scores. However, sometimes such situations arise in Test matches too, when teams collapse like a house of cards. Many times teams have been all out on very low scores in Tests. For example:- New Zealand team was limited to a score of just 26 runs against England in the year 1955. Here we will tell you about the five lowest team scores, which are recorded in the history of Test cricket.

5 lowest team scores in the history of test cricket

1.New Zealand – 26 runs vs England (1955)

The lowest score in the history of Test cricket came in the year 1955 in the match played at Eden Park, Auckland. New Zealand was all out for just 26 runs against England in its second innings. England’s bowlers, especially Brian Statham and Bob Appleyard, did not give any chance to the Kiwi batsmen. The New Zealand team was bowled out in 27 overs and only one batsman, Bert Sutcliffe, was able to reach double figures (11 runs). Due to this shameful performance, England won the match by an innings and 20 runs.

2. West Indies – 27 runs vs Australia (2025)

The second lowest score in the history of Test cricket came in the year 2025 in the Test match played between West Indies and Australia at Sabina Park, Kingston. Chasing the target of 205 runs, the West Indies team collapsed for just 27 runs in its second innings. Australian fast bowler Mitchell Starc took 6 wickets for just 9 runs, due to which West Indies’ batting fell apart like a pack of cards. This is West Indies’ lowest test score so far.

3. South Africa – 30 runs vs England (1896)

In the history of Test cricket, South Africa has had to face the embarrassment of being out on the lowest score many times. In a match against England at Gkebera in 1896, South Africa were all out for only 30 runs in their second innings. In this innings, England bowler George Lohman bowled amazingly and took 8 wickets for only 7 runs. England had easily won this match by a margin of 288 runs.

4. South Africa – 30 runs vs England (1924)

The fourth lowest score in the history of Test cricket came in the year 1924 in the match played between South Africa and England in Birmingham. The interesting thing is that South Africa had repeated the same score after 28 years. Once again the South African team was all out for just 30 runs. This performance reflects the strong bowling of England and the struggling start of South Africa in that period.

5. South Africa – 35 runs vs England (1899)

The fifth lowest score in the history of Test cricket came in the year 1899 in the match played between South Africa and England in Cape Town. In this match, the South African team was reduced to only 35 runs. All these matches took place in difficult conditions and in front of world class English bowlers, who made it almost impossible for the South African batsmen to score runs at that time.

The year 2026 has started in New Zealand. New Zealand welcomed the New Year with a grand fireworks display from ‘Sky Tower’, the tallest building in Auckland. As the first major city to welcome the New Year, Auckland’s approximately 1.7 million residents watched as 3,500 fireworks were fired from the 240-metre (787 ft) high Sky Tower. However, the celebrations were somewhat subdued due to rain in Auckland. Many small local events in the North Island were canceled due to warnings of rain and possible storm.

First place in the world to celebrate 2026

According to NDTV report, Kiritimati island, part of the Pacific country Kiribati, is the first place in the world where the New Year began. Located in the UTC+14 time zone, this island is also known as Christmas Island.

Auckland kicks off 2026 celebrations with a fireworks display launched from New Zealand’s tallest structure, Sky Tower. pic.twitter.com/9UcQ0DDrUH

— The Associated Press (@AP) December 31, 2025

At the same time, New Year events were kept limited in Indonesia also. The reason for this was the floods and landslides that occurred in Sumatra last month, in which more than 1,100 people lost their lives. In the capital Jakarta, simple events focused on prayers for the victims were held, while the mayor of Makassar appealed to citizens to stay away from parties and show condolences. Whereas in Bali, fireworks shows were canceled and traditional cultural programs were organized in their place.

New Year started on a sad note in Sydney

At the same time, across the Tasman Sea in Sydney, the year 2026 started in a serious and mournful atmosphere. The impact of the mass shooting incident that took place during the Hanukkah festival on December 14, 2025 at Bondi Beach in Australia’s largest city Sydney, in which a total of 15 people died and 40 were injured, was still visible. However, despite this horrific incident, thousands of people gathered on the downtown waterfront to watch the fireworks over the Sydney Harbor Bridge. During this period, strict security arrangements were also made.

According to an Associated Press report, for the first time, policemen were deployed with rapid-fire rifles at a New Year event. A minute’s silence was observed an hour before midnight to pay tribute to the victims. Additionally, images of menorahs were projected onto the bridge pillars and attendees were urged to light their mobile phone torches in solidarity with Australia’s Jewish community.

Also read: ‘Russia is confident that in Ukraine…’, what did Putin say about Zelensky in his last speech in 2025?

New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon on Saturday (27 December) welcomed the Free Trade Agreement (FTA) with India, whereas just a few days ago his country’s Foreign Minister had expressed strong objection to it. Luxon described the agreement as a historic achievement for his government and an important step towards future development.

Lakson said, “We had promised to have a free trade agreement with India in our first term and we have fulfilled it.” Emphasizing its economic importance, he said that this agreement will provide more employment, higher income and more export opportunities for 14 lakh Indian consumers.

What did New Zealand’s Foreign Minister say
He said that this agreement is part of the broader agenda of his government. The recent deal exposed divisions within New Zealand’s ruling coalition, as Foreign Minister Winston Peters criticized the deal as neither free nor fair. Peters, leader of the New Zealand First (NZF) party, further said that he had conveyed his party’s concerns to Indian Foreign Minister S Jaishankar and also said that despite his opposition to the deal, he had the utmost respect for him.

benefit to both countries
The free trade agreement was announced earlier this week after talks between PM Modi and Luxon. Both the leaders said that with this agreement, bilateral trade can double in the next 5 years and there can be investment of 20 billion dollars in India in the next 15 years. Negotiations for this agreement started in March. At the time of the announcement, Modi and Luxon said that the agreement reflects the shared ambition and political will to further deepen relations between the two countries.

New Zealand First Party leader expressed protest
Regarding this agreement, New Zealand First Party leader Peters wrote on Twitter, “New Zealand First had appealed to its coalition partner not to hastily finalize a low-quality agreement with India.” He alleged that speed was given priority instead of quality. Peters said that the National Party considered it better to make a poor agreement rather than work hard to achieve a fair agreement that would be beneficial to both New Zealand and the Indians.

The main point of contention for Peters is the treatment of the dairy industry. He said that New Zealand has completely opened its market to India, but in return the tariff on Indian imports of major dairy products has not been reduced.

read this also

Indian Railways will double the capacity of trains in major cities of the country in the next 5 years, know what is the plan

India-New Zealand FTA: Free-trade deal (India-New-Zealand FTA) has been confirmed between India and New Zealand. This will obviously boost bilateral trade between the two countries. However, New Zealand’s Foreign Minister Winston Peters is not liking this deal. He has called it ‘nonsense’. Criticizing the FTA between India and New Zealand, Peters said that ‘it is neither free nor fair.’ Along with this, he warned that whenever this deal goes to the Parliament, his party will oppose it.

What is the Foreign Minister regretting about?

Posting on social media platform He said the deal was bad for New Zealand because it had ‘a lot to lose’, especially on immigration. He said that New Zealand citizens are not getting anything special in return from this deal, including dairy.

Let us tell you that in this deal between the two countries, India has kept dairy products (milk, ghee, butter, cheese, cream) out of the scope of FTA, keeping the interest of the farmers at the forefront. That means the tariff on this will not be reduced. Union Minister Piyush Goyal has also said that India will never open its dairy sector for open trade because it supports the livelihood of about 70 million small farmers.

No compromise with dairy sector

New Zealand is one of the world’s largest exporters of dairy products. New Zealand has been trying to increase its reach in India’s dairy products market for a long time. There are lakhs of small dairy farmers in India. In such a situation, no compromise can be made on this sector so that there is no impact on the security of this sector and the livelihood of these farmers.

Keeping this in mind, the trade of dairy products between the two countries is limited. Dairy exports from New Zealand to India in FY2025 stood at only $1.07 million. This included milk and cream worth $0.40 million, natural honey worth $0.32 million, mozzarella cheese worth $0.18 million, butter worth $0.09 million and skimmed milk worth $0.08 million. The trade deal between India and America is also stuck on this issue. America wants India to open its dairy products market for them, but India is against it.

benefit to the common man

This free-trade deal between India and New Zealand will directly impact the pockets of the common man. With this, many things coming from New Zealand will become cheaper, including many fresh fruits like apple and kiwi, wool and its products, furniture, wood etc. Under the agreement, there will be no tax on 95 percent of the goods coming from New Zealand to India. In such a situation, this is a great opportunity for New Zealand businessmen to increase their reach in the Indian markets. Also, if foreign products become cheaper for the middle class families of our country, they will also get relief.

Also read:

What will be the impact of FTA between India and New Zealand on you? Which companies will benefit the most?

There has been a sharp reaction in New Zealand politics regarding the recently concluded Free Trade Agreement (FTA) between India and New Zealand. The country’s Foreign Minister and leader of the New Zealand First Party, Winston Peters, has strongly opposed this agreement, calling it ‘neither free nor fair’. He warned that the agreement was a ‘bad deal’ for New Zealand, in which the country had given too many concessions but received no concrete benefits in return.

‘Bad deal for New Zealand’
In a detailed post on social media platform X, Winston Peters said his party New Zealand First “regretfully opposes” the deal. They allege that in this FTA, serious concessions have been given on the immigration and investment front, while in return New Zealand did not get the expected benefits, especially in its major export sectors.

Allegations of loss to dairy farmers
Referring specifically to the dairy sector, Peters said that this agreement is not in the interests of New Zealand farmers. ‘This is not a good deal for New Zealand farmers and it is impossible to justify to our rural communities,’ he said.

More concessions on immigration, less benefits
According to Peters, New Zealand has given excessive concessions in the provisions related to immigration in the India-New Zealand FTA. He said that New Zealanders are not getting enough benefits from this agreement, especially in important sectors like dairy.

business expected to double
Despite Peters’ criticism, the governments of India and New Zealand have described this agreement as historic. Both countries say that this FTA can help in doubling bilateral trade in the next five years. According to the New Zealand government, under this agreement, duties will be eliminated or reduced on 95 percent of New Zealand’s exports to India, of which more than half of the products will become duty-free from day one. In return, all Indian products will get duty-free access to the New Zealand market. New Zealand has also committed to invest about 20 billion dollars in India in the next 15 years, which is being considered a big step in terms of economic relations between the two countries.

Prime Minister Lakson said ‘an agreement with great benefits’
New Zealand’s Prime Minister Christopher Luckson defended this FTA, saying that it would provide wide-ranging and significant benefits. He said in the statement, ‘India’s vast size and rapid economic growth creates huge opportunities for jobs, exports and economic growth for New Zealand.’ The agreement also fulfills the promise made by Laxman’s National Party in the 2022 elections to finalize an FTA with India in its first term.

Differences exposed in coalition government
Winston Peters’ sharp reaction has made it clear that there are deep differences within the ruling coalition regarding the India-New Zealand FTA. In the coming days, this issue may become more heated in the domestic politics of New Zealand.