Let us tell you, the film ‘O Romeo’ directed by Vishal Bhardwaj is based on Hussain Zaidi’s book ‘Mafia Queens of Mumbai’. In the film, Shahid Kapoor has played the role of Ustra, while Trupti Dimri has been seen in the role of Afsha. Apart from this, Nana Patekar, Avinash Tiwari, Disha Patani, Tamannaah Bhatia, Vikrant Massey, Farida Jalal and Hussain Dalal are also seen in important roles in the film.

Bollywood actors Shahid Kapoor and Trupti Dimri are in the news these days for their recently released film ‘O Romeo’. His film has been released in theaters tomorrow i.e. on 13th February. Today is the second day of the film and a lot of craze and excitement is being seen among the audience regarding this. Many viewers have also given their reactions regarding the film.

The audience called the film boring
Recently, in a conversation with ABP News, the audience has given their reactions. Audience Rajesh has praised the acting a lot. He said, ‘I had seen Kabir Singh before, it had very good action but this film is a bit boring. He further said that the action is quite good in this.

Farida Jalal was highly praised
Viewer Hema praised Farida Jalal a lot. He said that we 90S kids have seen Farida Jalal’s different style in ‘Kuch Kuch Hota Hai’ and many old films. But she has a negative role in this and she looks quite aggressive. I liked her character in this age. At the same time, he also praised Nana Patekar’s acting. However, he believes that Shahid Kapoor could not show as special talent in this film as he did in his film Kabir Singh.

He also talked about Bollywood and Tollywood films. He says, Tollywood stories are quite different. This is the reason why Bollywood makers also work on the same stories. He said that this is a good film of Vishal Bhardwaj. He also told that the film is quite long.

While talking about the story line, a viewer said that the topic of the film is quite different, it shows action along with romance. He told that the music in the film is very good, the acting and direction is very good. Maybe the film can do well on the occasion of Valentine’s Day.

About ‘O Romeo’
This film is Shahid Kapoor’s fourth film with Vishal Bhardwaj after Haider, Kaminey and Rangoon. Apart from Shahid and Trupti Dimri, the film also stars Avinash Tiwari, Farida Jalal, Vikrant Massey, Nana Patekar, Tamannaah Bhatia and Disha Patani. Set in a dark criminal underworld, the story revolves around a ruthless gangster whose life changes when a forbidden and unrequited love triggers a brutal gang war.

Vishal Bhardwaj’s film ‘O Romeo’, starring Shahid Kapoor and Trupti Dimri in the lead roles, has got a major legal victory. A Mumbai court has refused to stay the release of the film and also rejected the interim relief granted to the daughter of late gangster Hussain Ustara, who had claimed that the film is based on her father’s life.

Court refuses to ban the film ‘O Romeo’
Mumbai City Civil Court has rejected the demand to ban the release of the film ‘O Romeo’. The court says that at this time no concrete reason has emerged for banning the film. This decision was given by Judge H.C. Shende on Saturday.

What was the whole matter?
Petitioner Sanaubar Shaikh had told the court that the story of the film is similar to the life of his late father Hussain Shaikh alias Hussain Ustra. His allegation was that his father’s identity, personal life and name had been used without permission. He had demanded to stop the release of the film scheduled for 13 February 2026 and show the film first.

It was also said in the petition that the teaser, trailer and promotion of the film contain such characters and scenes which resemble the life of his father. The makers of the film told the court that this film is completely fictional, not the story of any real person and a clear disclaimer has also been given in it.

The court said that the film has already received legal approval and the petitioner has not challenged that approval. In the initial opinion of the court, it is not clear that the character in the film is directly based on the petitioner’s father. The court also said that the extent to which a person’s name and privacy rights apply after his death is a complex and evolving matter of law. In such a situation, it would not be right to ban the film immediately. The court also accepted that if there is any kind of loss, it can be compensated through compensation.

The court also took note of the fact that the petition was filed very late and a stay was sought very close to the release. The court rejected the demand to show the film first, saying that it would be like imposing censorship through the court. Ultimately the court rejected the petition and made it clear that the things said in this order are only preliminary and will have no impact on the final hearing of the case.