Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Priyanka Chaturvedi has strongly attacked Union Home Minister Amit Shah’s speech in Parliament. He said that it was not appropriate to repeatedly drag the Congress and the Nehru-Gandhi family by deviating from the issues during the discussion on electoral reforms. Chaturvedi called it a sign of government’s displeasure and arrogance.

It is clear from Priyanka Chaturvedi’s statement that the opposition is demanding a meaningful discussion on electoral reforms, while the government is being accused of deviating from the issue by limiting the issue to the Nehru-Gandhi family. This debate is likely to intensify in the coming days.

Government is deviating from the issue- Priyanka Chaturvedi

Starting her statement, MP Priyanka Chaturvedi said that the Home Minister’s speech should have focused on electoral reforms, but he used it to take a dig at the Congress and the Gandhi family. He said that showing anger and answering arrogantly made it clear that he did not have a concrete answer on electoral reforms. He further said that Priyanka Gandhi has already said that if the government has to discuss the Nehru-Gandhi family, then it should do it at once, so that the real issues of the country can be discussed further. Even after this, the same scene was repeated yesterday also.

Home Minister should avoid personal attacks- Chaturvedi

Chaturvedi alleged that the Home Minister spent more time commenting on the entire family from Jawaharlal Nehru to Sonia Gandhi, whereas a serious and balanced discussion was expected on an important issue like electoral reforms. He said that parliamentary tradition demands that when reforms related to the democratic structure of the country are being discussed, personal attacks should be avoided.

Demand for clear answer on electoral reform

The MP said that electoral reforms are linked to the future of the country and the strength of democracy. The country wants to know what concrete steps the government will take for a transparent election process. But instead of replying, the atmosphere was spoiled by cursing the opposition. He also said that democracy is strengthened not by weakening the opposition, but by dialogue and accountability.

Objections were also raised on the atmosphere in the House

Chaturvedi said that the falling level of debate in Parliament is worrying. He said that Parliament is a platform for discussion on country’s issues, problems of common people and strength of institutions, but it is being made an arena for political sarcasm.

Also read- Maharashtra: Shiv Sena worker’s father dies after surgery, supporters create ruckus in the hospital

Opposition MPs again reached the well of the House today demanding discussion on SIR, after which the Lok Sabha proceedings had to be adjourned till 12 noon.

This time the winter session of Parliament will run from December 1 to December 19. President Draupadi Murmu has approved the proposal of the Central Government. Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju shared this information on social media platform ‘X’. He said that this session will provide an opportunity for constructive and meaningful discussions and this will further strengthen democracy.

Kiren Rijiju said- the session will fulfill the expectations of the public
Rijiju wrote in his post that the President has given permission to convene the winter session of Parliament from December 1 to December 19, 2025, which will depend on the exigencies of parliamentary work. He described it as a creative and meaningful session, which will try to live up to the expectations of the public.

Commotion and low productivity in monsoon session
The monsoon session, which began on July 21, ended on August 21, a day before its scheduled time. This session was disrupted due to continuous opposition and repeated uproar. The opposition was demanding discussion on the Special Summary Revision (SIR) of the voter list in Bihar, due to which the proceedings had to be postponed several times.

How was the functioning of the Lok Sabha?
The productivity of Lok Sabha in the monsoon session was around 31 percent, while the productivity of Rajya Sabha was recorded at around 39 percent. A total of fourteen bills were introduced in the Lok Sabha in this session. Of these, twelve bills were passed by the Lok Sabha, while the Rajya Sabha approved fifteen bills. A total of fifteen bills were approved by both the houses and one bill was withdrawn from the Lok Sabha.

During the session, a special discussion was also held on India’s successful anti-terrorism operation ‘Operation Sindoor’. This discussion was held in the Lok Sabha on 28 and 29 July and in the Rajya Sabha on 29 and 30 July. This operation was done in response to the terrorist attack in Pahalgam.

Congress asked- Why was the session kept so short?
Congress leader Jairam Ramesh expressed his displeasure over the dates of the winter session. He said that normally this session starts between 20th to 23rd November and lasts for 3 to 4 weeks, but this time it has been kept for only 15 days starting from 1st December. Jairam Ramesh raised the question as to what the government is trying to avoid.

He asked whether the session has been shortened due to the increasing pollution of Delhi, or does the government not have any bill or issue to discuss? He also hinted whether this move is a sign that Lok Sabha elections may be announced soon. According to him, this is the first time that the government seems to be trying to dispose of the session so quickly.

Union Minister Amit Shah introduced three new bills in Parliament on Wednesday (August 20, 2025), which the opposition created a lot of uproar. AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi opposed the three new bills of the government, calling him an open exemption to become a executioner.

In the Lok Sabha, Owaisi said, ‘It violates the principle of sharing of powers and weakens the right to choose the government. This gives the executive agencies an open exemption to become a judge and a executioner on the basis of disgusting allegations and doubts.

Government bent on forming police state: Owaisi

Asaduddin Owaisi further said, ‘This government is bent on creating a police state. This will be a nail of death for the elected government. The Constitution of India is being amended to convert this country into a police state. According to the AIMIM chief, this step is a direct attack on elected governments and weakening the roots of democracy.

Owaisi warned that if these Bills were implemented, it will prove to be ‘Death Nail’ (final war) on India’s democracy. Owaisi described it as an attempt to suppress the voice of the public by tampering with the constitution.

What is the 130th Constitution Amendment Bill?

Explain that the opposition is very attacked by the second bill (130th Amendment Bill) in the three bills presented by the government in Parliament. According to the rules of this bill, whether it is the Chief Minister of the state or the Prime Minister of the country, if he has any serious criminal charge and he is in jail for 30 consecutive days, he will have to withdraw from his post. While presenting the bill, Amit Shah said that the government proposes to send it to the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC).

Also read:- As soon as the bill introduced in Parliament, opposition MPs tore copy and thrown towards Amit Shah, Video

Leader of the Rajya Sabha, House JP Nadda reacted to the speech of Leader of Opposition Mallikarjun Kharge, saying that he has given a long statement on different ministries, which will be answered. Nadda described Kharge as a senior and experienced leader and said that the words he selected was below his level. Regarding the remarks made on the Prime Minister, he said that he can understand his suffering, because he has had to sit in opposition for 11 years.

Opposition’s strong uproar over ‘Mental Balance’ comment
JP Nadda alleged that Kharge has been so much connected to the party that the country has become secondary and he has made such remarks by losing ‘Mental Balance’. Opposition MPs created a ruckus on this statement. In view of the situation, Nadda said that he takes back his words and should be ’emotional’ instead of ‘mental imbalance’. He urged that this comment be removed from the proceedings.

Kharge expressed resentment, Nadda apologizes
Reacting to JP Nadda’s comment, Kharge expressed displeasure and said that if he has been called ‘Mental’, he will not leave it like this. He retaliated and said that the ministers of the government themselves speak after losing their mental balance. After this, Nadda said that if his words have hurt the feelings of Kharge, then they apologize, but the opposition did not take care of the dignity of the Prime Minister.

I am not going to leave it like this
On the withdrawal of comments made by the House leader JP Nadda in the Rajya Sabha, Leader of the Opposition in the House Mallikarjun Kharge said, ‘There are some leaders in this House to whom I have immense respect. Nadda ji is one of them. Rajnath ji and he is a minister who speaks without losing his balance. He is telling me today. It is a matter of shame. They should apologize, I will not leave it like this.

During the discussion on ‘Operation Sindoor’ in the Lok Sabha on Tuesday, Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi questioned the Pahalgam terror attack. He said that Defense Minister Rajnath Singh in his speech talked about terrorism, national security and history, but did not say how the attack in Pahalgam was finally?

Priyanka Gandhi, while bowing to the bravery of the army, said that our army has been an unprecedented contribution in maintaining the integrity of the country from the first infiltration of Pakistan in 1948. He said, ‘Ministers spoke on all aspects, also narrated history, but the most important question was missed how the attack took place in Pahalgam, and why?’

People went to the government there- Priyanka

During this time, the Wayanad MP also mentioned the wife of Shaheed Shubham Dwivedi and said, ‘People had gone to the government there, but the government left him God. Whose responsibility is the attack? Is the security of citizens not the responsibility of the Defense Minister and the Home Minister? ‘

Priyanka Gandhi, referring to the establishment of terrorist organization TRF, its activities and the allegations of terrorism on it, said, “If any agency of the government did not even know about this fierce attack, then it is a serious intelligence.”

When Gaurav Gogoi was speaking, the Home Minister was laughing- Priyanka Gandhi

He called it a big lapse of the security agencies and said that the government would have to answer why and how such incidents are happening. Priyanka said, ‘You keep talking about history, I will talk about the present. You are in power for the last 11 years. Yesterday, when Gaurav Gogoi asked to decide the responsibility, Defense Minister Rajnath Singh looked serious, but Home Minister Amit Shah was laughing.

Pointing to the Mumbai attack, he said, ‘He alleged that the Manmohan government did nothing after 26/11, while the truth is that three terrorists were killed during the attack, one was caught alive, who was later hanged. At that time both the Chief Minister of Maharashtra and the Home Minister of the country resigned.

Pahalgam took place after riots in Delhi, but the Home Minister did not resign- Priyanka

Priyanka said, ‘Rajnath Singh was the Home Minister during the attacks of Uri and Pulwama and today is the Defense Minister. Manipur is burning during Amit Shah’s tenure, riots took place in Delhi and now the Pahalgam attack, yet why remains the Home Minister? The country wants to know this.

He said that after the Pahalgam attack, the whole country stood up unitedly and if such an attack takes place again, the country will be united again. If there is an attack on the country, then we will stand with the government, but will also ask questions.

On Tuesday (July 29, 2025) during the discussion of Operation Sindoor in Parliament, Priyanka Gandhi Vadra mentioned the time when former Prime Minister of the country Rajiv Gandhi was killed. Priyanka Gandhi Vadra said that tears fell from the eyes of my mother (Sonia Gandhi) when her husband was martyred by the terrorists when she was only 44 years old.

Priyanka Gandhi Vadra further said that today I am standing in this Parliament and arguing, because I know their pain. The country is not only leading by taking a shrine, taking responsibility for both success and failure. Is the Prime Minister, Home Minister, Defense Minister, NSA not responsible for the safety of the people.

‘No matter how many operations, you cannot hide from the truth’

Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi Vadra said, ‘Today most of the people sitting in this house have security shield, but on that day 26 people were killed in front of their families in Pahalgam. All the people present in the Basran Valley that day had no security. No matter how many operations you run, you cannot hide from the truth.

Pledge to protect everyone with vengeance

Priyanka Gandhi Vadra attacked the government and said that it is not the crown of gold, but the crown of thorns. When the government is false and cowardly, it also weakens the brave to brave army. The country needs a vow to protect everyone with vengeance, along with the power of the army, the truth of the government is also needed.

Referring to former PM Indira Gandhi, Vadra said, ‘Patriot martyr Indira Gandhi, who on the strength of successful diplomacy, made a partition of Pakistan, formed Pakistan, formed Bangladesh and forced many Pakistanis to surrender the soldiers, but they never took credit for it.

India’s motive was not fulfilled

He further said that the purpose of Operation Sindoor was to teach only Pakistan a lesson, so our aim is still incomplete, because our diplomacy has failed. The proof of this is that a Pakistani general, whose hands were dyed with blood, were sitting with the President of America and eating lunch.

Gandhi said, ‘If the purpose of Operation Sindoor was to end terrorism, then Pakistan has been shocked by being elected as the chairman of the United Nations Committee of Terrorism. The ruling party spoke on many aspects, but did not say why Pahalgam terror attack took place, how happened?

Also read:- ‘Voter ID to Pakistani Chocolate’, Amit Shah opened Pak connection of Pahalgam terrorists

During the discussion on Operation Sindoor on Monday in the Lok Sabha, Union Minister Rajiv Ranjan Singh alias Lalan Singh said that the real vein has been caught and the treatment will also be confirmed by some members of opposition parties.

Lok Sabha MP from Munger in Bihar, Lalan Singh, during the discussion, said in a light-hearted manner on the noise of the opposition members, ‘Go not … the voters have made a lot of fake … Look there.’

Your illness will end: Lalan Singh

The Union Minister of Panchayati Raj, while taunting the opposition parties opposing SIR’s exercise, said, ‘One thing tells that if the real disease is caught, then its treatment is also’ perfect ‘. If ‘diagnosis’ is correct, then ‘treatment’ is also confirmed. Your illness will end, do not worry.

There was a ruckus on SIR released in Bihar

There is a ruckus from Parliament to Bihar Assembly over the voter revision campaign being conducted by the Election Commission in Bihar. In the assembly, the opposition has been continuously creating a ruckus demanding the discussion on this, while the opposition in Parliament also had the same demand that this be discussed. Although it was said by the government that this Election Commission is doing, the government has no hand in this.

What did the Election Commission update?

The Election Commission has said that more than 50 lakh votes will be cut after SIR in Bihar. It was told by ECI that so far 7.24 crore voters have received forms. 36 lakh people have either gone elsewhere or they have died. The Commission also informed that 7 lakh voters of Bihar have been found in such a place whose names are recorded in more than one place.

Also read- How many fighter jets of India were dropped? Rajnath Singh replied in Parliament, said- Results matter …

On Monday, Union Home Minister Amit Shah launched a scathing attack on the opposition during the monsoon session of Parliament. Speaking in the Lok Sabha, he said that the leaders of the opposition do not trust the talk of the foreign minister of India, but they trust another country. Taking a sarcasm, he said, ‘I can understand what is the importance of abroad in his party, but this does not mean that he should impose his thinking in Parliament.’

Amit Shah criticized the opposition and said that if the opposition does not trust the Foreign Minister of India, then that is why he is sitting in the opposition and will sit there for twenty years to come. His statement came at a time when Foreign Minister S Jaishankar was giving information about ceasefire in Parliament.

There was no conversation between PM Modi and Trump
Foreign Minister S. in Parliament Jaishankar informed that on the morning of May 9, US Vice President JD Vance called India and expressed apprehension of Pakistani attack. On this, Prime Minister Narendra Modi responded clearly to America that India will give a ‘strong answer’ to this attack. Jaishankar said that there was no phone call between Prime Minister Modi and then US President Donald Trump between April 22 and June 17. The opposition started an uproar over this.

Amit Shah reversed opposition
Home Minister Amit Shah S. Defending Jaishankar, targeted the opposition. He said that, ‘India’s Foreign Minister is speaking here, but the opposition does not trust him. Their more faith is in foreign statements, so these next 20 years will also sit in the opposition.

Foreign Minister told strict action of India
Jaishankar said that India targeted Pakistan -based terrorist bases. On the morning of May 7, Pakistan was given a message and ‘Pakistan was taught a lesson’. He said that India will no longer bear nuclear blackmailing.

United Nations and International Response
S Jaishankar said that the United Nations condemned the terrorist attack, while Pakistan defended TRF. Quad countries criticized the incident and Tawwur Rana was extradited from America. France, Germany and European Union took a stand in favor of India. This is India’s diplomatic success.

Pakistan requested ceasefire request
The Foreign Minister also clarified that no third party was arbitrariness between India and Pakistan. Pakistan itself took the initiative of ceasefire and no inclination was shown from India.

Full details of government action
Jaishankar said that there was a meeting of the Cabinet Committee on Security Affairs, the members of the Pakistan Embassy were declared ‘Person of Non Greeta’ and the international community was made aware of the threat of Pakistan. He said, ‘We told the world that India has the right to protect its citizens.’

Pakistan’s expose in front of the world
Jaishankar said that when Pakistan crossed India’s ‘Red Line’, India took strict steps. Operation Sindoor was opposed by only three of the 193 countries of the United Nations, including Pakistan. India revealed the real face of Pakistan to the whole world.

The monsoon session of Parliament continues and ‘Operation Sindoor’ was discussed in the Lok Sabha on Monday (July 28, 2025). During this, Samajwadi Party MP Ramashankar Rajbhar told the media that today there was a debate on Operation Sindoor, so the terrorists were killed in Pahalgam. He said that if this debate had happened earlier, then the terrorists could have been eliminated earlier. Rajbhar alleged that the government is working very cleverly and it seems that it was deliberately waiting for the debate day.

In a conversation with the news channel Aaj Tak, the SP leader said, ‘The Defense Minister said in the House that we have killed hundred terrorists, their hideouts have been demolished. But this country wanted to know whether those four terrorists were killed or not. If this information has come today, then it is a good thing.

Questions raised on the intention of the government
Ramashankar Rajbhar said that if the government was active, then it could have done this work earlier. If this has happened after passing months, then the government can answer it. If the debate had happened before, the terrorists would have been killed earlier. The intention of the government may be like this.

“The government votes in everything”
He further said, ‘The government is very clever, it always votes in everything. If the terrorists have been killed on this day, then the Defense Minister should have spoken, but he did not say in the House that this has happened.

Priority told the safety of jawan, farmer and poor
SP MP Ramashankar Rajbhar from Salempur seat in Uttar Pradesh said in his address, ‘The life of the jawan should be safe on the border, the farmer’s field should be safe and the poor’s stomach is safe, this should be our policy. The Defense Minister spoke of killing 100 terrorists in this house, it is welcome. But among them 4 terrorists who were involved in the Pahalgam attack, their name did not come.