Independent MP from Purnia Rajesh Ranjan alias Pappu Yadav claimed that his security was removed and got angry. Attacking the government, he has said that an open invitation has been given to those who intend to attack him by removing his security. Describing his life as a threat, he asked why his security was being removed again and again. He said that he has gone to the High Court regarding this. Will also meet the Home Minister in the House.

MP Pappu Yadav said while talking to the media, “Give the criminal the open title that we have removed the security, you kill me. Yes, I have got security, there was no mercy from them in it.” Why are you removing my protection again and again? First, security was removed from Madhepura, when the arrest had just taken place. Before that there were three SLRs in Purnia, they were removed and now today they have hurriedly removed the BMP security.

VIDEO | Madhepura, Bihar: “The government has removed my security. It’s an open invitation to anyone who wants to attack me. My life is under threat,” says Independent MP Pappu Yadav, who was earlier arrested by Patna Police in a 1995 case.

He was released on bail on February… pic.twitter.com/DQjLSYmtr5

— Press Trust of India (@PTI_News) February 23, 2026

Will also go to Supreme Court, will also meet Home Minister – Pappu Yadav

When he was asked why is this happening to you? On this question, Pappu Yadav said, “We have gone to the High Court regarding this, there was a debate today.” Also going to Supreme Court. Also met the Speaker Saheb. Will meet the Home Minister in the House, will meet him at any cost.

Pappu Yadav was arrested on 6 February

It is noteworthy that MP Pappu Yadav was arrested on 6 February 2026 from his Mandiri residence in Patna in connection with a 31-year-old case registered at Gardanibagh police station. During his arrest, his supporters created a ruckus and protested. During this time there was an altercation between his supporters and the police. After this another case was registered against him.

Pappu Yadav’s health deteriorated after his arrest, after which he was taken to Indira Gandhi Institute of Ayurveda (IGIMS) and later referred to PMCH. On the basis of medical report, he was later sent to Beur jail. After this, on February 10, the court granted him bail in the 31-year-old Gardanibagh case. He was seen on a wheelchair during his appearance in the MP-MLA court.

Jan Suraj Party founder Prashant Kishore has reacted to the arrest of Purnia MP Pappu Yadav. He said that no matter how old the case is, if you have committed a mistake, action will definitely be taken against you. Independent MP from Purnia Pappu Yadav was arrested from his Patna home late on Friday (06 February) amid high voltage drama. After this, he was admitted to the hospital due to deteriorating health.

‘SIT formed in NEET student case only after our departure’

Jan Suraj Party leader Prashant Kishore said regarding the case of suspicious death of the NEET student, “Only after our departure, SIT has been formed in the NEET student case, the police officer there has been suspended.” The administration had said that the girl had committed suicide.

What is the allegation of Pappu Yadav’s supporters?

Terming the action taken by Bihar Police against Pappu Yadav as political vendetta, his supporters have raised questions on the timing and manner of the arrest. Supporters say that MP Pappu Yadav repeatedly raised the issue of death of NEET student in Patna, due to which the government has taken action against him.

In which case was MP Pappu Yadav arrested?

At the same time, according to the police, MP Pappu Yadav was arrested in a case of 1995. This case is related to Gardnibagh police station, which was earlier registered under the old Indian Penal Code and now this case is going on under the Indian Justice Code (BNS). In this case, sections 419, 420, 468, 448, 506 and 120B of criminal cases have been imposed on the MP. It is being told that the hearing was going on in the court, but the MP remained absent continuously. The owner of the house had complained and alleged that the MP had fraudulently taken his property to run his office.