Ram Navami 2026: Mathura, 23 March 2026: A wonderful confluence of devotion and harmony was seen today on the holy land of Uttar Pradesh. A consignment of special prasad and gifts was sent from Mathura, the birthplace of Lord Krishna, to Ayodhya Dham, the birthplace of Maryada Purushottam Lord Shri Ram. Chaitra Shukla Navami means 27 March 2026 upcoming to be celebrated Ram Navami To commemorate the festival, this initiative has been taken by Shri Krishna Janmasthan Seva Sansthan.

Departure amidst devotion and joy

On Monday morning the atmosphere of Mathura appeared completely devotional. When shouts of ‘Jai Shri Ram’ and ‘Radhe-Radhe’ echoed amidst the light drizzle, it seemed as if nature was also welcoming this meeting. On this occasion, the artists presented mesmerizing Krishna Leelas, which left the devotees present there emotional.

A decorated vehicle was flagged off from the temple premises with rituals and classical traditions. This vehicle, carrying the reverence of Mathura, is now moving towards Ayodhya.

What is special in Prasad?

According to the officials of Shri Krishna Janmasthan Seva Sansthan, special attention has been paid to the traditions of Braj in this ‘gift’ sent for Ramlala. Gift items mainly include the following items:

• 11 maunds (about 440 kg) coriander leaves: The main prasad made on special festivals in Braj.
• Laddus and Panchmeva: Sweets full of purity and taste.
• Ramlala’s clothes and makeup: Beautiful attire and jewelery specially designed for the Lord.
• Aromatics and Fruits: Fresh fruits and divine perfumes for worship.

Symbol of tradition and harmony

Member of the Managing Committee of the Institute Gopeshwarnath Chaturvedi and secretary Kapil Sharma Told that this is not just Prasad, but a symbol of unbreakable trust between the two holy places. In the past too, similar spiritual innovations have been seen on Holi and Shivratri between Srikashi Vishwanath Dham and Sri Krishna Janmabhoomi.

“This is the union of the love of Braj and Awadh. When this Prasad of Mathura will be offered to Ramlala on the holy festival of Ram Navami, it will add a new thread to the faith of crores of devotees.”

There will be a special gift on Ram Navami

all this material 27 March in Ayodhya Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Pilgrimage Area Will be handed over to. On the day of Ramnavami, this panjiri and laddus will be used during the main afternoon abhishekam and bhog. In view of the huge crowd of devotees in Ayodhya, the administration has also made strict security arrangements. This gift from Mathura has doubled the beauty of the upcoming Ram Janmotsav.

Kal Ka Rashifal 24 March 2026: Aries is worried about expenses, Virgo gets big benefits, know the condition of all the zodiac signs.

Disclaimer: The information provided here is based only on assumptions and information. It is important to mention here that ABPLive.com does not endorse or confirm any information. Before implementing any information or belief, consult the concerned expert.

Delhi’s Patiala House Court has given a big blow to lawyer Mahmood Pracha by rejecting his petition in which he had demanded to declare the Supreme Court’s 2019 Ayodhya verdict nullified. The court has imposed a fine of Rs 6 lakh on the lawyer, terming the petition as ‘frivolous’, misleading and an abuse of the judicial process.

District Judge Dharmendra Rana said in his order that the petition filed by Mahmood Pracha is not only beyond the facts but it also raises questions on the credibility of the judicial system. The court said that it appears that the petitioner did not read the Ayodhya verdict completely, otherwise such confusion would not have arisen. The court admitted that this case was filed only for the purpose of creating publicity and spreading misunderstanding.

Lawyer misinterpreted Justice Chandrachud’s speech

In the petition, Pracha had claimed that the then CJI D.Y. Chandrachud had said in a speech that the Ayodhya verdict was based on the solution given by Lord Shri Ram Lala. On this, the court clarified that Justice Chandrachud had only said that he had prayed to God for guidance and not received any solution from any party. The court said that the lawyer filed the case without understanding the difference between God and juristic personality i.e. a legally recognized deity.

Court expressed displeasure and gave strict warning

Making a strong comment, the court said that when the protectors become the predators, then the situation becomes worrying. The court said that such negligence cannot be expected from a senior lawyer. The court also added that it is necessary to take strict action against such baseless cases so that the time and resources of the judicial system are not wasted.

Reference to Judge Protection Act

Patiala House Court clearly said in its decision that this case is a bar under the ‘Judges Protection Act, 1985’. According to this Act, no civil or criminal action can be taken against any judge for judicial work. Upholding the order of the lower court, the court increased the amount of fine from Rs 1 lakh to Rs 6 lakh and said that it is everyone’s responsibility to maintain the dignity and sanctity of the judiciary.