Senior Congress Party leader Renuka Chaudhary has given a big statement regarding the speech given by Rahul Gandhi and his sister Priyanka Gandhi Vadra in the Lok Sabha on Friday (December 12, 2025). Renuka Choudhary said that the personalities of both Rahul and Priyanka are completely different, hence they should not be compared.

The speeches given by Rahul Gandhi and Priyanka Gandhi Vadra in the Lok Sabha during the winter session of Parliament for the last two days have become a topic of discussion, commenting on which senior Congress leader Renuka Chaudhary said, ‘They are like apples and oranges, which cannot and should not be compared with each other.’

Actually, this statement of Renuka Chaudhary has come out after the discussion in which it is being said that while Priyanka Gandhi Vadra gave an impressive speech during the debate in the Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, who was active in politics much before her, did not take full advantage of his opportunity.

People are free to express their views: Chaudhary

Renuka Chaudhary told NDTV, ‘It should be kept in mind that both of them had given their speeches in the House on different issues, so any kind of comparison would be absolutely nonsense psychologically, however, people are completely free to express their opinion.’

He said, ‘Priyanka Gandhi is very good, she said whatever she had to say in the House. If we talk about Rahul Gandhi, he talked on a different issue and his style is also different. Reiterating his point, he said, ‘It is like comparing apples and oranges. This does not happen. Both of them expressed their views on different subjects in the House.

Both raised issues in their own way: Renuka Chaudhary

Renuka Chaudhary further said, ‘We become too conservative and expect a certain kind of reaction that it should be like this, but it does not happen. Different people express their views on things in different ways. I think both of them raised important issues in their own way.

However, when he was asked a question about being a better speaker, he refused to take the name of any one and said that the styles of both are so different that it would not be right to call any one of them better or lesser.

Also read: Acharya Pramod Krishnam met PM Modi in Parliament, know about which issue was discussed?

Today (December 1, Monday) on the very first day of the winter session of Parliament, Congress MP Renuka Chaudhary got embroiled in a unique controversy. Actually, she reached Parliament with her pet dog in her car. As soon as this video of his surfaced, there was a stir in political circles and BJP termed it as playing with the dignity of Parliament and demanded action against him.

When the media questioned Renuka Choudhary on the incident, she retorted and said that the matter was being blown out of proportion unnecessarily. He said, “What is the problem in this? If a dumb animal comes inside, what is the big problem? It is small, it is not going to bite. There are other people inside the Parliament who are going to bite.” The controversy deepened as soon as his statement came to light.

#ParliamentWinterSession Delhi: On the controversy over bringing a dog to Parliament, Congress MP Renuka Chowdhary said, “Is there any law? I was on my way. A scooter collided with a car. This little puppy was wandering on the road. I thought it would get hit. So I picked it… pic.twitter.com/fNPkCMfOyX

— ANI (@ANI) December 1, 2025

Renuka Chaudhary responded to PM Modi’s statement

Renuka Chaudhary also responded to the comments made by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on the opposition. He asked that if the government was so worried about the session, then why was the scheduled session of one month reduced to just fifteen days? He said, “Why are you worried about what issues we will raise in the House? Were the issues less? Then why was the session shortened?”

BJP MP Jagdambika Pal made allegations

BJP MP Jagdambika Pal accused Renuka Chaudhary of misuse of privileges and said that Parliament is a forum for serious discussion on the country’s policies, where such actions are against ‘extra-public conduct’ and the reputation of Parliament. He said, “Reaching Parliament with his dog and then making such comments brings shame to the country. Action should be taken against him.” He called it an insult to democracy and demanded a tough stance.

Read this also-

Pakistani Currency Value in Muslim Countries: Pakistani Rupee has no status even in Muslim countries, know where PAK’s currency fell the most?