Regarding Virat Kohli, former cricketer Sanjay Manjrekar had recently said that he retired early from Test, whereas he could have improved his technique and game. He had said that Kohli was in poor form for the last several years, but instead of retiring, he could have improved his game even if it meant getting dropped. Now a post of Vikas Kohli is going viral, which people are considering as a reply to Manjrekar’s statement.

What did Vikas Kohli write?

Vikas Kohli wrote in the thread, “It seems that people cannot survive without taking the name of Virat Kohli.” This post of Vikas is being considered as a reply to Virat’s critics. Although he did not take anyone’s name here, people are associating it with Sanjay Manjrekar. Recently he had raised questions on Kohli’s retirement from Test.

Virat Kohli’s brother Vikas spitting facts pic.twitter.com/zdxuVb6IBG

— RCBIANS OFFICIAL (@RcbianOfficial) January 7, 2026

What did Sanjay Manjrekar say?

While sharing a video on Instagram recently, Sanjay had said that at the time when Joe Root is making new records in Test cricket, Virat Kohli’s departure from Test cricket is saddening. He said that Root, Kane Williamson, Steve Smith are strengthening their Test career.

He had said that Kohli’s performance in Tests was poor for the last several years. He said, “Kohli did not try to improve his technical and mental shortcomings.” According to him, if Kohli wanted, he could have worked on these shortcomings and could have even sat out of the team for some time. The former cricketer said that he was more disappointed by the fact that Virat decided to leave Test cricket and continue playing in ODIs.

Former Indian batsman and cricket analyst Sanjay Manjrekar is once again in the news about Virat Kohli. This time their target is Virat’s decision to retire from Test cricket. After England batsman Joe Root’s 41st century in his Test career, Manjrekar compared Virat Kohli with his contemporary greats and raised sharp questions as to why Kohli left Test cricket.

Comparison after Joe Root’s century

Joe Root, Steve Smith, Kane Williamson and Virat Kohli have long been considered the “Fab-4” of modern cricket. All four have made their own identity in Test cricket. Of these, Virat Kohli is the only player who has said goodbye to Test cricket, while the remaining three are still playing in this format. Manjrekar seemed to be upset by this very thing.

Manjrekar’s attack in Instagram video

Sanjay Manjrekar said in a video shared on his Instagram account that seeing Joe Root’s achievement reminded him of Virat Kohli. He said that Kohli leaving Test cricket is very unfortunate, especially when he was struggling with poor form for a long time before his retirement. According to Manjrekar, Kohli did not try his best to find out why his average in Test cricket remained around 31 for five years.

‘It is inexplicable to leave just Test cricket’

Manjrekar made it clear that his protest is not against Kohli’s retirement, but against the manner of his decision. He said that if Virat had completely said goodbye to cricket, it would have been understandable, but his decision to leave only Test cricket and continue playing ODIs disappoints him. Manjrekar taunted by calling ODI cricket an “easy format” for top order batsmen and said that the real test comes only in Test cricket.

He also told why Test cricket is most important for him. According to Manjrekar, Test cricket is the real test of a player’s patience, technique and mental strength. There are different difficulties in T20 cricket, but no format is as difficult as Test cricket.

Kohli has a chance to make a comeback?

Manjrekar also said that considering Virat Kohli’s fitness and discipline, it was possible for him to return to Test cricket. If needed, he could have re-prepared himself by playing first-class cricket, whether in domestic or overseas conditions. According to him, Kohli still had enough potential to continue the fight and try to make another strong comeback.

Virat Kohli retired from Test cricket in May last year. Earlier, he had also said goodbye to T20 format. Now he plays for Team India only in ODI format. Now talking about Kohli’s Test retirement, former Indian cricketer Sanjay Manjrekar said that he feels sad that Kohli left Test and continued playing ODI.

Sanjay Manjrekar shared a video on Instagram, in which he gave his opinion about this. He said that at the time when Joe Root is making new records in Test cricket, Virat Kohli’s departure from Test cricket is sad. He said that Root, Kane Williamson, Steve Smith are strengthening their Test career.

‘Did not try to correct the shortcomings’

Sanjay Manjrekar said that Virat Kohli’s performance was not good in the 5 years before his retirement from Test, but he did not try to improve his technical and mental shortcomings. According to him, if Kohli wanted, he could have worked on these shortcomings and could have even sat out of the team for some time. The former cricketer said that he was more disappointed by the fact that Virat decided to leave Test cricket and continue playing in ODIs.

According to Sanjay Manjrekar, Test is more difficult for a top-order batsman than ODI. It requires more patience, technical and mental strength. The test is the most difficult. ‘It would have been understandable if he had retired from all three formats, but it did not seem right to him to leave Tests and continue playing in ODIs.’

Virat Kohli played 123 matches in his Test career, in which he scored a total of 9230 runs in 210 innings. He has 30 centuries and 31 half-centuries to his name in Tests.

It would not be wrong if Test cricket is called the biggest platform for patience, concentration and technique. Here the goal is not only to score runs, but it is equally important to put the team in a strong position by staying at the crease for a long time. An example of this patience are the slowest centuries scored in Test cricket, which are still remembered with different respect in the history of cricket.

Mudassar Nazar – Pakistan

At the top of this list is Pakistan’s Mudassar Nazar, who completed his century in 557 minutes against England in Lahore in 1977-78. This was not just slow batting, but a great example of saving the team in difficult situations. This innings of his is still considered to be the slowest century in Test history.

Jackie McGlue – South Africa

At second place is Jackie McGlue of South Africa, who scored a century in 545 minutes against Australia in Durban in 1957-58. In that era, bowling was very challenging and the pitches were also not very helpful for the batsmen. In such an environment, this innings of McGlue was very popular.

Asanka Gurusingha – Sri Lanka

At third place comes Asanka Gurusingha of Sri Lanka, who completed his century in 535 minutes against Zimbabwe in Harare in 1994-95. This innings was extremely strategic, as Sri Lanka’s priority in that match was to avoid defeat, and Gurusingha spent his time playing accordingly.

Jeff Crowe – New Zealand

Jeff Crowe of New Zealand scored a century in 516 minutes against Sri Lanka in the Colombo Test in 1986–87. This innings shows how a calm mind and correct technique can keep the bowlers troubled for a long time.

Sanjay Manjrekar – India

India’s Sanjay Manjrekar completed his century by playing a 500-minute blockathon innings in Harare in 1992-93. Despite the difficult pitch, slow outfield and tight bowling attack, this century of Manjrekar is counted among the classic innings of Indian cricket.

2 greats of England also in the list

England’s Peter Richardson (488 minutes, 1956-57) and Keith Fletcher (458 minutes, 1974) also have a place in this record list. Both of them played slow innings in such matches, where the team’s aim was to stay at the crease more than to score runs.

Slowest Test Century In Test Cricket History: Test cricket started 148 years ago i.e. in 1877 and the first test match was played between Australia and England. In the beginning of this format, very low scores and slow runs were common. In modern day cricket, big totals and high run rates are seen and results are also seen in most of the matches.

The name of former Indian batsman Sanjay Manjrekar is also present in the list of batsmen who have scored the slowest century in Test cricket. Here we will tell you about 7 batsmen who have scored the slowest centuries in the history of Test cricket.

7 batsmen who scored the slowest century in test

1. Mudassar Nazar – 557 minutes

Former Pakistan opener Mudassar Nazar is at number one in the list of 7 batsmen who have scored the slowest century in the history of Test cricket. Nazar had scored the slowest century against England in Lahore in 1977. He batted for 557 minutes in this match.

2. Jackie McGlue – 545 minutes

Former South African opener Jackie McGlue is second in the list of batsmen who have scored the slowest century in the history of Test cricket. McGlue scored the second slowest century against Australia in 1957 in Durban after batting for 545 minutes.

3. Asanka Gurusingha – 535 minutes

Former Sri Lankan opener Asanka Gurusingha is at third place in the list of batsmen who have scored the slowest century in the history of Test cricket. Gurusingha had scored the third slowest century against Zimbabwe in Harare in 1994. He batted for 535 minutes in this match.

4. Jeff Crowe – 516 minutes

Former New Zealand captain Jeff Crowe is fourth in the list of batsmen who have scored the slowest century in the history of Test cricket. Crowe batted for 516 minutes against Sri Lanka in Colombo in 1986, after which he scored the fourth slowest century.

5. Sanjay Manjrekar – 500 minutes

Former Indian batsman Sanjay Manjrekar is at fifth number in the list of batsmen who have scored the slowest century in the history of Test cricket. Manjrekar had scored the fifth slowest century against Zimbabwe in Harare in 1992. He batted for 500 minutes in this match.

6. Peter Richardson – 488 minutes

Former England opener Peter Richardson is at sixth place in the list of batsmen who have scored the slowest century in the history of Test cricket. Richardson batted for 488 minutes against South Africa in Johannesburg in 1956, after which he scored the sixth slowest century.

7. Keith Fletcher – 458 minutes

Former England batsman Keith Fletcher is at seventh place in the list of batsmen who have scored the slowest century in the history of Test cricket. Fletcher scored the seventh slowest century against Pakistan at The Oval in 1974. He batted for 458 minutes in this match.

Former England captain Nasir Hussain termed the proposal of Ben Stokes to finish the fourth Test early as Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar to call Harry Brook’s decision to bring Brook into the bowling attack as ‘uninterrupted’. Hussain said that Jadeja and Sundar were entitled to their centuries.

Hussain told ‘Sky Sports’, “I had no problem with this (Jadeja and Sundar’s batting). England seemed to be a problem with this. They were a little tired, the bowlers were tired so they wanted to leave the field, but both the players worked hard to reach 80 and 90 runs and they wanted to score a century in the Test match.

He said, “Stokes in the end did not need to show Brook bowling and shown it uninterrupted. We give much importance to these things. He played well and the entire credit goes to India.

When Cheteshwar Pujara asked Washington Sundar the same question, he postponed the matter. Sundar said on ‘Geographstar’, “I think everyone saw what happened on TV and they all enjoyed it.”

Former India batsman Sanjay Manjrekar believed that the Indian batsman had the right to continue the game accordingly. He said on ‘Geographstar’, “I think Ben Stokes finally behaved like a bad child.” He said, “I would like to see what England would have been if his two batsmen were close to the Test century?”

India vs England confirmed the fracture in the leg of Rishabh Pant on the second day of the fourth Test, but the Indian vice -captain took a bold decision and came out to bat. When he was coming on the field, the audience present at the Old Trafford Cricket Ground stood and played applause. Pant won the hearts of the fans by batting despite being a fracture, the veterans also praised his passion. Pant made a significant contribution in reaching Team India’s score to 358 by playing a half -century innings.

Praising Rishabh Pant, Sanjay Manjrekar said on Geographstar, “When you do it as Anil Kumble decided to play a bandage on the jaw, these are the moments of history that you will remember even after 50 years. It shows how committed to play for India.”

Rishabh Pant wants to leave his mark in the test

Sanjay Manjrekar said, “There is something special in the Test, especially when it is in England. How much attention is given to you as a cricketer, he wants to give his best here. If you think that he does not have the same impact in the cricket of the limited overs, then this is probably the reason. Because Rishabh Pant wants to leave his mark in more Test cricket than other formats.”

Here comes rishabh pant …

A Classy Reception from the Emirates Old Trafford Crowd pic.twitter.com/vbwsukdfcw

– England Cricket (@NglandCrick) July 24, 2025

Rishabh Pant is the captain of the Lucknow Super Giants team in the IPL. While sharing a photo of Pant on his social media, the owner of this franchise, Sanjeev Goenka wrote, “Not just talent, it is a character. Sellute.”

Not just talent. This is character. Salute. #INDVSENG pic.twitter.com/ptyw8atcbz

– Dr. Sanjiv goenka (@drsanjivgoenka) July 24, 2025

Sanjay Manjrekar said, “When we saw Rishabh Pant with Gautam Gambhir, he was in white dress, we felt that he would come to bat at the end of the innings. But who thought he would come to bat after falling the sixth wicket. He was clearly seen in pain, he was completely decided. He decided that he would bat.”

Former Indian cricketer Sanjay Manjrekar Done Lords Test Third day of England Against Shubman Questions have been raised on Gill’s attitude. Manjrekar Believe that the third day England Of batsman Jack Crowley The impact of the debate with Gill’s second innings Batting But lying Manjrekar Gill and Kohli Comparing that when Kohli If this used to happen, They Used to emerge as a better batsman, but this did not happen to Gill.

Crowley Answer to debate with England Gill the last day to Gill, when India landed to achieve the target of 193 runs. England The player of Gill continuously Sled He was seen doing The pressure on Gill was clearly visible and he scored just 6 runs Breden Cars He was dismissed on the ball.

Manjrekar What did you say?

Manjrekar Done ESPNcricinfo In the show of Ki, “Virat Kohli When the opposition players used to do this, he used to emerge as a better batsman. But Shubman Its on gill Reverse Saw effect. He looked very nervous and his confidence looked weak. “

he adds, “Stump Mike I was hearing a lot. Some personal comments were also made. Perhaps this experience was new to Gill, because nowadays foreign teams treat Indian players friendly. But this time the matter was different and Gill did not look ready for it. “

Manchester The fourth match will be played in

India and England Five matches between Series Fourth match of 2From July 3 Manchester Of Old Traffic Will be played in This time Series In England 2–1 ahead. On the one hand the Indian team will want They By winning this match Series Take me equal There itself England The team of winning this match Series Would like to capture

Also read-

Today, two big matches, first West Indies-South Africa collision, then Australia-England will clash; Learn playing XI

Ind vs eng 3rd test: The third Test match being played between India and England has now reached its decisive turn. The match is completely open before the fifth and last day’s play and any team can win, but former India batsman and experienced commentator Sanjay Manjrekar believes that England’s victory in this thrilling battle is 70 percent, while India has given just 30 percent chances to India.

What is the complete equation of victory between India and England

In the first innings of this third Test being played at Lord’s, both teams scored 387-387 runs. After this, India got their tight and with accurate bowling, England had consisted of just 192 runs in the second innings. India had a target of 193 runs, in which India has scored 58 runs for 4 wickets on the fourth day. That is, India still has to score 135 runs and on the other hand, if England will have to take 6 wickets to win.

Sanjay Manjrekar’s big statement

Former veteran cricketer Sanjay Manjrekar reacted to the current situation of the match, saying, “It seemed till the fourth day that India will not lose this match and will win easily and either England will lose or the match will be drawn, but now the situation has changed. The new ball and morning moisture has changed on this pitch. Percent. “

No skill now in the match, Mental Strength will decide the winner

Manjrekar has not considered India’s possibilities completely over. He said, “India has a great batsman to win matches like KL Rahul, Rishabh Pant. If they play both under pressure, India can still win, but now winning this match has become a mental battle more than a skill.”

He also added that if England are forced to bring fast bowlers against Rishabh Pant and Rahul, India can get the benefit of it, because after this, England can use Spinner Shoaib Bashir soon.

Now everyone’s eyes on the fifth day

This five-match Test series is currently 1-1 and the fifth day of Lord’s Test will decide which team will be able to gain an edge in this series.

Ind vs eng 2nd test: Team India fast bowler Mohammad Siraj has now started raising questions about the Test form. Former Indian cricketer and commentator Sanjay Manjrekar has asked the new head coach Gautam Gambhir and captain Shubman Gill to focus on Siraj’s recent performance. Manjrekar has said during an interview that now the time has come that the team should consider some other option instead of Siraj and the team management will have to take the responsibility of taking this “difficult decision”.

Siraj’s form became a reason for concern

In the Haddingley Test against England, Siraj took two wickets in the first innings, but he was completely flopped in the second innings. However, in a spell, he definitely put some good balls. He harassed Jack Crolee with his bowling and also gave Ben Docket a chance to dismiss 97, which Yashasvi Jaiswal lost the catch, but there is a clear lack of consistency in him.

Regarding his form, Sanjay Manjrekar said in a conversation on ESPN Cricinfo, “Now the time has come for the team to take difficult decisions. Siraj is a senior bowler in the team, he has bowled with his full experience. He has a spell in the headingley and his old record is also fine, but at the moment we have to keep an eye on today’s situation.”

Sanjay Manjrekar’s criticism is based on data, not just on the spirit. Siraj has taken just 28 wickets in his last 10 Tests, and the decline in his performance has put more pressure on Bumrah. In such a situation, Team India will have to find a trusted second fast bowler as soon as possible.

Better option told the famous Krishna

Manjrekar described the famous Krishna as a better option than Siraj. He told Krishna in a better form than Siraj and has talked about giving him priority as the partner of Jaspreet Bumrah. He said that during the last moment during the Test match, captain Shubman Gill himself was calling Krishna for the wicket. He said, “I felt that at the end of the Test Krishna seemed to be the bowlers from whom Shubman was expecting a wicket. He was a little expensive, but the hunger to take wickets was clear in them. So if I want to choose the team right now, I will include the famous Krishna in the team instead of Siraj. It is a difficult decision, but it is necessary to see the recent form of Siraj.”

Demand for return of Nitish Reddy, and Kuldeep in place of Shardul

Not only Siraj, Manjrekar has also suggested to exclude Shardul Thakur. He has advocated to include Nitish Kumar Reddy in his place. Also, he has also talked about bringing Kuldeep Yadav into the team instead of a fast bowler. He further said, “Do not feed the seamors just because you are playing in a country where the seam movement takes place. If I was, I would drop a seam bowler and instead Kuldeep Yadav would include Kuldeep Yadav in the team. Also, Nitish Reddy should get a chance to play in place of Shardul.”