Pakistan Reaction: Pakistan has lodged a strong protest against the joint statement issued between India and Afghanistan in New Delhi on October 10. In this statement, Pakistan has expressed strong objection to declaring Jammu and Kashmir as a part of India and has called it a violation of the resolutions of the United Nations Security Council.

In a statement issued by the Foreign Ministry of Pakistan, it was said that declaring Jammu and Kashmir as a part of India is a clear violation of the relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions and the legal status of Jammu and Kashmir. Pakistan said that this joint statement of India and Afghanistan is extremely insensitive towards the sacrifices of the people of Kashmir and their fight for the right to self-determination.

Expressed protest by summoning Afghanistan’s ambassador

Pakistan summoned Afghanistan’s ambassador to Islamabad regarding this joint statement and formally registered its serious concerns. Additional Secretary (West Asia and Afghanistan) of Pakistan’s Foreign Ministry told the Ambassador that calling Jammu and Kashmir a part of India is unacceptable.

Pakistan-Afghanistan also clash over terrorism

In the joint statement, Afghanistan’s acting Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaki had said that terrorism is an internal problem of Pakistan. Pakistan has also reacted sharply to this statement. Pakistan termed Muttaki’s statement as beyond facts and irresponsible. The Foreign Ministry said that Pakistan has told the Afghan government several times that terrorist elements named “Fitna-e-Khawarij” and “Fitna-e-Hindustan” are working against Pakistan from Afghan soil.

The statement said that by putting the responsibility on terrorism on Pakistan, the interim Afghan government cannot be freed from its responsibilities. “Afghanistan’s land should not be used against Pakistan.”

Also raised the issue of return of Afghan refugees

Pakistan also said in its statement that it has been hosting about four million Afghans for four decades. Now that peace is returning to Afghanistan, Afghans living in Pakistan without permission should return to their country. The Foreign Ministry said that Pakistan has the right to control the presence of foreign nationals within its border, and this is in line with international norms. Along with this, Pakistan claimed that it is also issuing medical and study visas to Afghans from humanitarian point of view and will continue to provide assistance to the Afghan people in the spirit of Islamic brotherhood.

‘We want a stable and prosperous Afghanistan’

The statement said that Pakistan wants to see a peaceful, stable and regionally connected prosperous Afghanistan. In this spirit, Pakistan has provided trade, economic and connectivity facilities to Afghanistan. However, Pakistan made it clear that its first responsibility is the safety of its citizens and Afghanistan will have to take concrete steps to stop its territory from being used by anti-Pakistan terrorist elements.

Muttaki said- Pakistan should solve its own problems

Afghanistan’s Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaki, who is visiting India, said on Pakistan’s objections after the joint statement of India and Afghanistan, ‘We understand that Pakistan has done wrong. Problems are not solved this way. We have kept the doors open for talks, but Pakistan should solve its own problems. The Foreign Minister of Afghanistan also said that peace has come in Afghanistan after 40 years and this attitude of Pakistan is not right. This statement has proved uncomfortable for Pakistan, due to which it has become nervous.

India and Afghanistan had condemned the Pahalgam terrorist attack.

It is noteworthy that in a joint statement issued on October 10, India and Afghanistan had condemned the terrorist attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir on April 22, in which 26 people were killed. Both countries condemned terrorism in all its forms and stressed the need to enhance peace, stability and mutual trust in the region.

Russia has appealed to be vigilant about nuclear rhetoric due to a dispute between US President Donald Trump and former Russian President Dimitri Medvedev. Kremlin spokesperson Dimitri Peskov said on Monday that Russia takes nuclear non -proliferation seriously and all sides should take great care in this subject.

Angered by the warnings of Dimitri Medvedev, Trump said that he has ordered two nuclear submarines to be deployed in ‘appropriate areas’ near Russia. He took this decision seriously taking Medvedev’s ‘inflammatory and silly’ statements.

Medvedev’s threats and Trump’s response
Medvedev warned Trump that every new ultimatum is a step towards war. Trump recently reduced the ceasefire of the ceasefire from 50 days to 10–12 days in Ukraine, which Medvedev expressed his displeasure.

Russia’s response and Vaitchoff’s visit to Moscow
Russia welcomed Trump’s special messenger Steve Vitkoff’s visit to Moscow. Peskov said, ‘We are always happy to see Vitkoff in Moscow. Such contacts are important and helpful. He also indicated a possible meeting with President Vladimir Putin.

How many and what nuclear submarines do America have?
The US Navy fleet includes three types of nuclear power -powered submarines.

1. Ballistic missile submarine (SSBN) – These submarines are equipped with nuclear weapons and serve to intimidate the enemy strategically.
2. Attack submarine (SSN) – These high speed submarines are designed to destroy enemy ships and other submarines.
3. Guided missile submarine (SSGN) – They have long distance missiles, which can target any target from a distance.

Trump’s warning- ‘Medvedev is entering dangerous area’
US President Donald Trump, former Russian President and currently vice -president of Security Council Dimitri Medvedev were badly provoked. Trump said, ‘Russia’s unsuccessful former President Medvedev, who still considers himself president, should explain to him to pay attention to his words. He is entering a very dangerous area.

On Monday, Union Home Minister Amit Shah launched a scathing attack on the opposition during the monsoon session of Parliament. Speaking in the Lok Sabha, he said that the leaders of the opposition do not trust the talk of the foreign minister of India, but they trust another country. Taking a sarcasm, he said, ‘I can understand what is the importance of abroad in his party, but this does not mean that he should impose his thinking in Parliament.’

Amit Shah criticized the opposition and said that if the opposition does not trust the Foreign Minister of India, then that is why he is sitting in the opposition and will sit there for twenty years to come. His statement came at a time when Foreign Minister S Jaishankar was giving information about ceasefire in Parliament.

There was no conversation between PM Modi and Trump
Foreign Minister S. in Parliament Jaishankar informed that on the morning of May 9, US Vice President JD Vance called India and expressed apprehension of Pakistani attack. On this, Prime Minister Narendra Modi responded clearly to America that India will give a ‘strong answer’ to this attack. Jaishankar said that there was no phone call between Prime Minister Modi and then US President Donald Trump between April 22 and June 17. The opposition started an uproar over this.

Amit Shah reversed opposition
Home Minister Amit Shah S. Defending Jaishankar, targeted the opposition. He said that, ‘India’s Foreign Minister is speaking here, but the opposition does not trust him. Their more faith is in foreign statements, so these next 20 years will also sit in the opposition.

Foreign Minister told strict action of India
Jaishankar said that India targeted Pakistan -based terrorist bases. On the morning of May 7, Pakistan was given a message and ‘Pakistan was taught a lesson’. He said that India will no longer bear nuclear blackmailing.

United Nations and International Response
S Jaishankar said that the United Nations condemned the terrorist attack, while Pakistan defended TRF. Quad countries criticized the incident and Tawwur Rana was extradited from America. France, Germany and European Union took a stand in favor of India. This is India’s diplomatic success.

Pakistan requested ceasefire request
The Foreign Minister also clarified that no third party was arbitrariness between India and Pakistan. Pakistan itself took the initiative of ceasefire and no inclination was shown from India.

Full details of government action
Jaishankar said that there was a meeting of the Cabinet Committee on Security Affairs, the members of the Pakistan Embassy were declared ‘Person of Non Greeta’ and the international community was made aware of the threat of Pakistan. He said, ‘We told the world that India has the right to protect its citizens.’

Pakistan’s expose in front of the world
Jaishankar said that when Pakistan crossed India’s ‘Red Line’, India took strict steps. Operation Sindoor was opposed by only three of the 193 countries of the United Nations, including Pakistan. India revealed the real face of Pakistan to the whole world.

India-Pakistan News: India strictly dismissed Pakistan’s repeated statements about Jammu and Kashmir during a debate on peace establishment reforms in the United Nations. Describing them as ‘unfair’, India made it clear that Jammu and Kashmir was an integral part of India, and will always be.

Speaking in the United Nations Security Council, India’s permanent representative Ambassador Parvathaneni Harish criticized Pakistan and said that it is trying to divert attention from the main discussions on peace establishment. He said, ‘India considers it necessary to clarify that the representative of Pakistan has once again made unfair remarks on the Indian Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir. Such repeated claims neither recognize their illegal claims nor justify terrorism across their state-resonated border.

‘Empty illegal possession’

Harish also clearly stated that Pakistan is illegally occupying a part of Jammu and Kashmir and should be vacated immediately. He said, “Pakistan is illegally occupying the area of ​​Jammu and Kashmir, which should be abandoned.” Along with this, Harish insisted that India will not allow questions on its sovereignty on global forums.

Gave a befitting reply to Pakistan

Harish rejected Pakistan’s efforts to misuse the United Nations Forum for his narrow and divisive agenda, saying, “We would advise Pakistan not to try to divert the attention of this platform.” He also clarified that India does not understand the need to give a detailed response as its situation has already been clarified. He said, “India will refrain from exercising the right to give more detailed answers.”

While the United Nations session focused on reforms in peace establishment, India used this opportunity to emphasize the need to deal with challenges like armed groups and modern weapons, ‘Harish spoke on the important role of the army and police contributing countries in determining the mandate of peace campaigns and stressed the need to provide adequate funds to meet the needs’