Shankaracharya Avimukteshwaranand said on Sunday (3 August 2025) that a cow should have been taken into it during the inauguration of the new Parliament House in Central Vista. He asked reporters, “If the idol of a cow can enter Parliament, then why can’t the living cow be brought inside?”

Shankaracharya said that while entering the new Parliament House, the shape of the cow was carved on the ‘Sangar’ which was caught by Prime Minister Narendra Modi. He said, ‘To bless a real cow should also be brought to the building. If there is a delay, then we will bring cows from all over the country and bring them to the Parliament House.

Prime Minister and Bhavan should bless the real cow- Avimukteshwaranand
Avimukteshwaranand said that this would ensure that the Prime Minister and the building bless the real cow. The Sangar has been established in the lower house of Parliament. He also demanded that the Maharashtra government immediately prepare a protocol on cow honor. He said, ‘The state has not yet declared how to respect the cow. He should finalize a protocol so that people can follow it and should also fix punishment on its violation.

One Ramdham- Shankaracharya should be in every assembly constituency of India
Shankaracharya demanded that every assembly constituency of India have a ‘Ramdham’ i.e. a cowshed with a capacity of 100 cows. The Hindu religious leader said that the Dharma Parliament has passed a congratulatory motion in support of Hoshangabad MP Darshan Singh Chaudhary, who has demanded that the cow should be declared a nationalist. On the language dispute, he said, ‘Hindi was recognized for administrative use for the first time. The Marathi -speaking state was formed in 1960 and Marathi was later recognized. Hindi represents many dialects – the same applies to Marathi, which has borrowed language from its own dialects. Shankaracharya said that any kind of violence should be considered a criminal act. He demanded justice in the Malegaon blast case and said that the real culprits should be punished.

Also read: Shibu Soren Death: Former Jharkhand CM Shibu Soren dies, son CM Hemant Soren said- ‘Today I am zero’

Shankaracharya Avimukteshwaranand Maharaj has reacted strongly to Malegaon blast case and terrorism. He has surrounded the central and state government on this issue. He said that a terrorist is a terrorist. Shankaracharya also questioned whether ‘saffron’ will be a terrorist, then you will worship him?

Talking to the media, Saint Avimukteshwaranand Maharaj said, “Terrorism is of any color, it is terrorism. Terrorists come and go away after carrying out the incident. You do not find the culprits. There were 7 blasts in Mumbai but you could not find the guilty, there was a blast in Malegaon, you could not find the guilty. ”

Personal for color-looking terrorism- Avimukteshwaranand

He further said, “When it comes to finding terrorists, then you hide your failures and then start searching for color in terrorism. The color that is of life. After death, your eyes do not see color, people who find color in terrorism are biased towards terrorism.

Malegaon Blast Case

• On Thursday (July 31) in the 2008 Malegaon blast case, the court acquitted all the 7 accused
• Malegaon blast prosecuted for 17 years
• Three chargesheets were filed by Maharashtra ATS and NIA.
• On September 29, 2008, 6 people died after a bomb tied on a motorcycle in Malegaon.
• Riots also erupted after the 2008 Malegaon blast incident.

The blast would not have happened on its own- Avimukteshwaranand

Shankaracharya raised the question and said, “The blast would not have happened on its own, there must have been someone in it. Who was he? The Government of India, the state government is failing to find it. Someone comes and goes on blasting, then we are not able to find even after applying time and resources. This is a big slap on our ability.

Shankaracharya Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati held a press conference on Wednesday (July 23) and spoke on many issues. On the violence over language dispute in Maharashtra, he said that those who do so will remain alone one day.

Avimukteshwaranand said that the matter is that when talking in the context of language, this language is not violence. Those who use this kind of language will become alone after a few days.

What did you say on the blast case?

Apart from this, he said on the 2006 blast case, who died in this incident? What is the decision of the court? Are those who have been caught today are innocent? The incident happened on its own, Mumbai has become miraculous?

He further said that how did the court take this decision? Which government failure is a different matter. What kind of case was made? Wouldn’t you listen to anyone’s testimony after 3 of 100 days? It took 11 years to decide the decision?

A statement on cow slaughter also

Regarding the case of cow slaughter and supply, he said, “Have the first state mother in Maharashtra, give her description?
How to eat, how to make a protocol in this case. This thing will be delivered to the Chief Minister and the concerned minister will also be sent to the matter. “

What did you say on Tirupati Prasad?

On Tirupati Prasad, he said that there was a petition in the Supreme Court. 3 days ago, he had to say that something was added to Tirupati’s offerings. He had to say that he should issue a instruction to offer prasad in pure ghee, but the court said to withdraw its petition.

He said that but why was the comment filed by the petition? This is a wonderful thing that is being distinguished in cow cow. If you say this, then the offerings of God should be made with bitch milk? What do you want to say?

What did you say on the ban on pigeon in Mumbai?

It is said in the case of pigeon eater, this will be of 3 stages
First petition again notice and hearing
Disease spreads by pouring pigeons, it also contains bacteria in human feces.
What should be done to remove humans? Should the ration shop be removed?
Pigeons should be redeveloped
Initially, we have to put them habit, now we leave them in their condition, how can this happen?
If there is any confusion with the decision of this court, then they can go to their second court.

Murshidabad vioolence: Demonstrations are being organized against Waqf Amendment Act in many states of the country. In West Bengal’s Murshidabad and South 24 Parganas, the performance turned into violence. Border Security Force (BSF), Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF), State Armed Police and Rapid Action Force (RAF) have been deployed in large numbers in Jangipur, Dhulian, Suti and Shamsherganj. Shankaracharya Swami Avimukteshwaranand targeted CM Mamata Banerjee for this violence.

Demand for President’s rule in Bengal

Swami Avimukteshwarananda demanded that President’s rule be imposed in West Bengal. He said, “President’s rule should be implemented to control the located in Bengal. The central government has to do politics on the situation there and get a photo.” He said, “It is still time that Hindus of Bengal should stand to protect cow mother and start killing those who come to kill Gau Mata.”

The situation is gradually becoming normal- police

The state police said that the situation is gradually becoming normal in the riot affected areas of Murshidabad, shops are opening and displaced families are coming back. On Friday and Saturday, violent protests took place in many areas including Suti, Dhulian and Jangipur in the district regarding the Waqf Amendment Act. Demonstrations soon turned into clashes, killing at least three people and injured several.

BSF visited these areas

A delegation of BSF led by Additional Director General (East) Ravi Gandhi visited Suti and Shamsherganj police station areas as well as several disturbed areas of Dhulian, where there was widespread violence. Officials said that a total of 210 people have been arrested so far in connection with the violence. The movement of vehicles on the Basanti highway in Bhangar area of ​​South 24 Parganas district was normal, where incidents of violence against the Waqf Act on Monday.

Also read: After drinking alcohol, he went to the petitioner’s house, he himself invited trouble … Supreme Court angry with this comment on rape, SG Mehta also argued