A Khalistani terrorist Sharanjit has been arrested by the NIA team from Gaya in Bihar. The terrorist was absconding for a long time and he was hiding in Sherghati in Gaya for a long time. After the information received by the NIA team, he raided late Friday and arrested him from Gopalpur in Sherghati.

Sharanjit Kumar is the main accused

The NIA team and the local police station Sherghati police have raided the National Highway near Gopalpur village and arrested them. The NIA said that in March 2025, the main terrorist accused Sharanjit Kumar alias Shani has been arrested in the Amritsar temple grenade attack case, who hails from Bhani Bangar village in Kandia district of Batala in Gurdaspur district of Punjab.

On 15 March 2025, Sharanjit had an active role in the conspiracy of a terrorist attack and executing it. Two bike riders were attacked with a grenade, including Gursidak Singh and Vishal Gill. The NIA investigation revealed the conspiracy of the Handlarrows internationally in Europe, America and Canada.

On the night of the Thakurdwara temple on the night of March 15, 2025, explosives were thrown on the first floor, causing a part of the wall to damage and broke the glass of the windows. After the attack, the Punjab Police identified Gursidak Singh and Vishal. On March 17, when the police caught him, he started firing on the police, injuring a head constable. Gursidak Singh was killed in a counter -police firing.

The place was built in the line hotel

Arrested terrorist Sharanjit Kumar received a grenade consignment on 1 March 2025 at Batala, Gurdaspur, which was assigned a grenade to Gursidak and Vishal, two days before the attack. After the attack, he used to conduct his activities by changing disguise and sometimes by making a truck driver and sometimes other identity. He had built a hideout at the line hotel on GT Road and was active from there. After the arrest, the NIA team has left for Chandigarh with them.

Also read: Bihar Elections: RJD workers reached Rabri residence for tickets, why warned not to vote?

The Supreme Court will announce an important decision on Friday in which the disputed order has been challenged to hold all stray dogs from Delhi and four districts (Noida, Ghaziabad, Gurugram and Faridabad). This order was issued on 8 August and now the question is whether it will be stopped, revised or will be applicable.

Decision will be heard of three judges
A bench of three judges headed by Justice Vikram Nath (along with Justice Sandeep Mehta and NV Anjariya) will decide whether the order is completely banned or changes or retained.

August 8 order and its expansion
On August 8, a bench of Justices JB Pardiwala and R Mahadevan ordered that all stray dogs be caught and kept in permanent shelters in eight weeks and should not be released on the streets again. Later in written order it was extended to Faridabad. Also, a 5,000 capacity shelter was instructed to build in eight weeks.

Dispute and objection
Controversy immediately arose over this order. Many NGOs and animal welfare groups said that it is against the ‘Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act’ and ‘Animal Birth Control (ABC) Rules’. According to these rules, dogs have to be sterilized and vaccinated and left back to the same area, not to close in shelters on a large scale.

Chief Justice changed benches
After the criticism and in view of the new petitions, Chief Justice BR Gavai withdrew the case from the Pardiwala bench and handed over to a large bench of three judges (under the leadership of Justice Nath). The bench held a long hearing on August 14 and reserved the verdict, which will now be pronounced on Friday.

Court displeasure at hearing
During the hearing, the big bench reprimanded the Delhi government and the municipal corporations that they are not implementing their own rules. The court said that both the safety and animal welfare of humans are being affected. The court asked the Delhi government whether it would follow the law or not.

Arguments of government and opposition parties
Giving examples of attacks on children and deaths from dog bytes, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta said that immediate intervention is necessary. He said that dogs do not have to kill, but it is necessary to separate, sterilize and treat. At the same time, many senior lawyers including Kapil Sibal, Abhishek Manu Singhvi and Siddharth Luthra said on behalf of the NGOs that this order is illegal and invalid. He showed his statistics of the government that there was no death due to the recent dog byte in Delhi, which exposes the baselessness of the order.

Animal welfare conditions in order
In the written order issued on 11 August, the shelter should not have cruelty with dogs, should not be hungry, congestion should be avoided, weak dogs should be kept away and veterinary-related conditions were also added. Also, adoption was allowed to adopt with the approval of the Animal Welfare Board, but there was a direction of “strict action” on leaving the adopted dogs on the road.

Why the matter started
The whole matter arose when a six -year -old girl died of rabies after a dog bites. The Pardiwala bench had said that the incidents of dog byte are showing “worrying patterns” and local bodies have failed to ensure safety of public places.