The story of Justice Surya Kant, who came from the streets of Hisar, Haryana and reached the highest judicial chair in the country, is an example of hard work, struggle and honesty, which can become an inspiration for every youth who dreams big. Justice Surya Kant can take oath as the next Chief Justice of India (CJI).

At present Justice B.R. Gavai is handling this responsibility and after his retirement, Justice Surya Kant can be handed over the reins of the judiciary of the country. Justice Surya Kant was born on 10 February 1962 in Hisar, Haryana. Justice Surya Kant, who was sharp and disciplined in studies since childhood, graduated from Government PG College, Hisar in 1981. After this, he obtained LLB (Law) degree from Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak in 1984.

Masters from here

Justice Surya Kant, who had no intention of stopping in the world of law, continued his education and passed his Master’s Degree in Law (MLL) from Kurukshetra University in 2011 with first class and first rank.

Also read – Vacancy for many posts in Government Medical College, Chandigarh, read details in one click

From the beginning of advocacy to the big stage

According to reports, in the year 1984, he started practicing law from the district court of Hisar. Soon his ability and hard work earned him recognition and in 1985 he moved to Chandigarh, where he started practice in the Punjab and Haryana High Court. He also worked as a legal advisor to several universities, boards and government banks.

Brilliant career in judiciary

In the year 2000, he was appointed Advocate General of Punjab-Haryana High Court. Four years later, in 2004, he became a High Court judge. After this he became the Chief Justice of Himachal Pradesh High Court. In 2019, he was appointed judge of the Supreme Court. Here too he heard many important cases and set new standards of justice.

Also read – Opportunity to work in Central Coalfields, 10th pass to graduates can apply, last date today

Education Loan Information:
Calculate Education Loan EMI

The cases of judges have been in discussion for some time. Sometimes Justice Yashwant Verma makes the headlines for the bundle of notes found in the house, sometimes a criminal openly threatens a judge. In such a situation, if a criminal case has come up against a judge, then action is also taken against him, then that judge is from the High Court or of the Supreme Court. According to the constitution against the judges, a process is run to remove them. But how all this happens, who has the right to do so. Let’s know about this.

Can not remove arbitrary

The judiciary is an essential institution of democracy of the country, in such a situation, provisions have been given clearly in the Constitution regarding its fair and independent operations. Whether the judges whether of the Supreme Court or the High Court, their tenure cannot be lifetime, but they have not been removed from the post arbitrarily. The process of removing a judge from the post is called IMPEachment Process, which is a very complex process.

What is the provision to remove judges in the constitution

Article 124 (4) of the Constitution talks about removing the judges of the Supreme Court. According to the constitution, the judge can be removed for only two reasons, one is on the basis of disqualification, in which a judge is involved in corruption or is misusing his position or makes a serious moral mistake. At the same time, the second reason is the disability, in which the judge is not able to work physically or mentally.

What is the removal process

The process of removing judges consists of several steps after another, which involves the proposal in Parliament. If a judge is to be removed, then an impeachment motion is passed in Parliament. To present this proposal in the Lok Sabha, the signature of 100 MPs and at least 50 MPs is required to present it in Rajya Sabha. After this, an inquiry committee is formed. After getting the proposal, the Speaker of the Lok Sabha or the Chairman of Rajya Sabha constitute a three -member committee. It consists of senior judges of the Supreme Court, a Chief Justice of the High Court and a reputed jurist.

Last seal of president

This committee investigates and then submitting the report and suggests whether the judges are guilty or not. After this, there is a process of voting in Parliament. If the committee found that the judge is guilty, then this proposal has to be passed in both houses of Parliament. It should be passed by a special majority. That is, more than 50% of the Parliament and at least two -thirds of the members present will have to vote in its favor. If it passes through Parliament, then it is sent to the President. The judge can be removed after the President’s approval.

Also read: Are Delhi’s fierce heat upset? You will not be able to stand in these countries for two minutes