World’s First Narco Test: Narco test is an interesting forensic technique. It is used during criminal investigation. Actually, in this a drug, which is usually sodium pentothal, is given to the person to take him to a state of semi-consciousness or hypnosis. After going into this state, all the hesitations of the person are reduced and it is believed that his ability to lie is also suppressed. This technique is used to obtain true information from the person. Today we will know when the narco test was first done and how criminals confess their crimes by using it.

When did the narco test start?

This test was first performed in 1922 in the United States by Dr. Robert House, an gynecologist from Texas. The doctor had used a drug called Scopolamine on two prisoners to see if this drug could force them to tell the truth.

How does this test work?

Narco test is based on some medicines. These are usually called truth serums. These medicines affect the normal functioning of the brain. Substances like sodium pentothal or sodium amytal reduce self-control and the power of imagination of the human mind. It is because of this that a person is not able to fabricate a false story.

what is the whole process

First of all, the medicine is delivered to the person’s body through injection. The quantity of medicine depends on the age, gender, health and physical condition of the person. This test is completed by a team of experts. This team includes an anesthesiologist, psychiatrist, clinical or forensic psychologist, and medical staff to monitor the person’s condition.

When the person reaches a complete trance-like state, the doctor starts asking him questions. Video recording of this entire process is done. This is because during this entire process the person can give some information which can come out spontaneously or without any filter and which can be considered as a clue.

Accuracy and limitations

Despite scientific validation, narco test is not completely reliable. Under the influence of medicine, a person can mix truth with imagination. This is the reason why statements given during narco test are not considered legally or scientifically conclusive. At the most, those things are used as investigative clues for further investigation.

Legal and constitutional aspects in India

No person can be forced to undergo narco test in India. Doing so is a violation of Article 20 (3) of the Indian Constitution. At the same time, this test can be done only with the person’s own will and informed consent. The results of this test are not accepted as direct evidence in court. However, if any new evidence or material is found as a result of the information obtained during the narco test, then it is accepted under Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act 1872.

Also read: This country of Asia is the cheapest for India, you can live here like a king in just a few rupees.

Cji br gavai on constitution: Chief Justice BR Gawai said on Wednesday (25 June 2025) that the Constitution of India is supreme and all three organs of democracy work under the Constitution. He said that some people say that Parliament is supreme, but in his opinion the Constitution is paramount. Justice Gawai, who took oath as the 52nd Chief Justice last month, was speaking at his reception in Amravati, his hometown in Amravati, East Maharashtra.

He said that there is always a discussion on which part of democracy is supreme – executive, legislature or judiciary. He said, “Although many people say and believe that Parliament is supreme, but according to me the Constitution of India is supreme. All three organs of democracy work under the Constitution. ”

‘Parliament has the power to amend’- CJI BI Gawai

Referring to the decision passed by the Supreme Court on the basis of the principle of ‘original structure’, Chief Justice Gavai said that Parliament has the power to amend, but it cannot change the original structure of the Constitution. He said that just by passing the order against the government, no judge becomes independent. He said, “The judge should always remember that it is our duty and we are the patron of the rights and constitutional values ​​and principles of the citizens. We do not only have power, but we have also been put on duty.

What will people say? In what relation did CJI say this

The Chief Justice said that no judge should be directed by what people will say about their decision or what they will feel. He said, “We have to think independently. What people will say, it cannot be a part of our decision making process. During his address, the Chief Justice cited some of his decisions. Referring to his decision against ‘bulldozer justice’, he said that the right to shelter is supreme.

Amanatullah Khan on Waqf Act: Aam Aadmi Party MLA Amanatullah Khan has reacted to hearing in the Supreme Court on petitions against the Waqf Act. He has hoped to get relief from the Supreme Court in the case. At the same time, he also expressed confidence that the Waqf Amendment Bill that has been brought will be stopped today.

‘AAP’ MLA Amanatullah Khan said, “We are hopeful from the Supreme Court that there will be relief in this. We all have come to prepare well. There are many petitions. Keeping all the grounds in mind, we have come for the way the government wants to capture the lands of Waqf. Today there is every hope from the Supreme Court. The eyes of the entire country are also on the Supreme Court and we are confident.

Delhi: on the Supreme Court Hearing Please Against The Waqf Amendment Act, Aap MLA Amanatullah Khan Says, “We have full hope from the Supreme Court that we will get that we will get Bill that has been brought will be styed today. pic.twitter.com/yhkimslkdh

– IANS (@ians_india) April 16, 2025

Government’s purpose to capture Waqf lands- Amanatullah

He further said, “Home Minister Saheb himself has said that the 123 properties in Delhi are at prime location, so what is his purpose. It is their purpose to capture the land and there is no purpose. It is their aim to capture the lands of prime location and Waqf only and only.

‘Waqf Act is not justified from anywhere’

Accusing the government, Amanatullah Khan also said, “Their aim is to get it to be dismantled in every village and entire city. The way these laws have brought, it is not justified from anywhere. There are 1977 properties inside Delhi, I got 298 properties made and the rest of these people did not let me do it. All the agencies fell behind. ”

Several petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the recently made amendments in the Waqf Act, 1995 have been filed in the Supreme Court. In response to the petitions seeking a ban on the implementation of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, the Central Government has filed a cavity in the Supreme Court.